Ceri Jones <cezerpringle1@yahoo.com> wrote:
CJ> "i'll teach you to turn away." <crank@got.net> wrote in message
>> i specify the answer to your question in my text. did you read it?
CJ> Err, there was no text to your post, just a link...
right. you're supposed to follow the link. & you said you read it,
which apparently was a misstatement on your part.
>> ps, the following negates your "all due respect" bit:
CJ> Ok, but please respect that it takes balls to reply given the shouting down
CJ> I have recieved.
i do respect spine & being able to admit fault.
>> CJ> Did you have to be so patronising with your post, I described how it
CJ> Ok, I appologise for this, that'll teach me for reading usenet before my
CJ> first coffee of the day.
CJ> What happened was that I "thought" I had said that I had read the healing
CJ> FAQ, when in fact I didn't say that at all, I also cannot read the text you
CJ> must have written for some reason... I have no idea why.
CJ> I again appologise.
accepted.
the text is available & is in ascii; you should have no problem
reading it with any web browser. try again.
CJ> Ok, as I have said I appologise and am in the wrong.
CJ> I just hope I regain a little respect for replying rather than sloping off
CJ> into the shadows, I have felt like it after being called stupid and some
CJ> else telling me he hopes my ear falls off.
not slinking away, not responding with "fuck you, you don't know
anything", admitting fault & apologizing all are good things & earn you
credit here.
CJ> That was actually meant as a friendly gesture but it obviously seems
CJ> sarcastic, I again appologise.
that's fine, we're over it now. find a way to read my text, then
ask followup questions which i haven't already addressed & i'll be glad to
help further.
lish "it gives me a headache just trying
crank@got.net to think down to your level." -mr
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70