Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
>
> > Hmm. What are the restrictions on posting the contents of their Terms
> > of Use? ;o)
>
> Oh, I'm sure I'd get a pass for pointing out your violation of federal
> laws.

Excuse me, Sheriff Taylor, but maybe you and Barney Fife could solve
that one murder-suicide and let the website advertisers worry about
the impact of people posting articles to RAB.

> But then, I did it more to point out something, something you either
> don't get, or don't care about.

Oh, I care. I caZZZZZ

> Websites sell advertising. The advertisers expect people to come to
> the website. By posting content, you prevent the advertisers from
> having the opportunity.

Actually, by posting the article and the link at the bottom, I'm
possibly driving more customers to their websites. Duh.

> That is wrong.

*You're* wrong. Don't hear me crying, though, do you? (That's not
crying, Kavvy, it's laughing. Fyi.)

> Artists should respect copyrights. It is their only chance to protect
> work. I guess since you aren't an artist, and have nothing you can
> sell, you don't care. Perhaps you think it makes you an anarchist.

Back to my nap. ZZZZZ

But first...

Q:
> What is your saying?

A:
You are a turd in the punch bowl.

What do I win?

> Oh yes: it reflects on you.

Okay, Pee-wee.

> > Finite time, Kavvy. You've succeeded in whittling away a few seconds
> > of my limited time, but at what cost?
>
> See above. No cost to me. How about you? Hows that karma thing
> working for you right now?

(looks around)

Seems fine.

--
Curt