Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > > By the way, why didn't you include the OP's statement?
> > > I'll answer it for you.
>
> > See? You don't have questions.
>
> Dipshit,

There are those social skills again.

> it is still a question.

Of what use is a question if your mind's already made up, Kavin?

> But you have just proven why I NEEDED to answer it for you.

Right. Need and not choice. That's odd.

> > Too busy answering for others instead of listening. You're
> > closed to discussion.
>
> And you just discussed how?

That's just it. We're not having a discussion, are we?

> Bitching is not discussing.

There you go. Write that on an index card and tape it to your mirror.

> Funny, you didn't argue the point that I said "Integrity" and you
> changed it to "social skills."

Changed it? I wrote a post in reply to your comment. You don't
remember what you wrote?

(snaps fingers)

You okay, Kav?

> No argument on your mediocrity, either.

Is it really necessary to argue with someone who says the sky is plaid
and filled with flying unicorns?

> Yeah, you can teach me a lot about discussion. A lot.

Cool. Then we're making progress.

--
Curt