Curt

On Nov 5, 9:43 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Nov 5, 12:40 am, dhrr...@ohatzhapu.bet (The Queen of Cans and Jars)
> wrote:
> > philthybeat...@gmail.com <philthybeat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> pb> > Not really any of your business what the tattoo itself is. My
> pb> > question was about the diamond studs.
>
> qc> trying to jazz up a weak tattoo with microdermals is a bad idea.
>
> qc> get a good tattoo instead.
>
> Come now. We all know that a good tattoo is the one the wearer
> wants.

No, you idiot, as much as we've been over this, well, one would think
you'd have it down by now. I consider the source, of course. Anyway,
here:

Art is subjective. Imo, there are no bad tattoos. There are, however,
tattoos that you like or that you don't like for personal reasons.

Do yourself a favor and write it down, okay?

> (God, that hurt to type,

Hey, some might say it hurts to read what you type.

> even in jest)

No joke.

--
Curt