yttrx wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
>
> >> Alright, if I can find them, a few people who like you.
> >
> > Hey, they're there. Ask around. ;o)
>
> I did, that's why I'm asking.
Ask someone else.
> > I'm not IM'ing you.
You forget how that went on IAM? Sad, really. That whole agree to
disgree thing was beyond your grasp apparently. Yes, imo, obviously.
> > I'm not emailing you.
That's probably not such a good idea either.
> > I'm not calling you.
Of course, if you're dead set on meeting me then ping me at curtjames
at g mail dot com with specifics - bar location, an email addy, and a
cell number.
> > If you're not reading RAB, that leaves us with, what,
> > homing pigeon? I said enjoy your fiction, but it seems
> > you've moved well beyond that.
>
> You know, for a person who's professed
Professed? That sounds too fancy. I just say stuff, no pronouncements
or decrees. I will say, obviously, at this point in time I'm
disinclined to meeting with you. There are a number of IAMers and
RABbits I'd love to meet, but you're not on that list. You're typically
rude and abrupt and, I suspect, it would be a waste of my time if we
met.
> endlessly to never have once been bothered
You haven't bothered me. I'm just not interested in meeting you. The
reasons should be obvious. 1) I think you're a jerk. 2) ...
Well, jerk about covers it.
> by anything I've ever said about him
Some opinion, some fiction, some unverifiable comments. What's to be
bothered by?
> or to him, you sure are acting as if your panties are in a bunch
> about SOMETHING.
Perception. You're absolutely welcome to yours, however skewed it might
be.
> Hey man, I don't have to push it.
Push what? The idea of us meeting? And for you to not say anything?
Sounds like the best time. I'll pass.
> You don't want to, that's cool.
Cool.
But, hey, you mentioned fate, right? Perhaps I'll be seeing you.
--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/