Average price

I want to get a lower back tattoo, and I wonder what a cost to do that.

Since I am novice in this area..

On Wed, 23 May 2007 18:27:14 GMT, Kristine Anne Thopson
<kristineth@charter.net> wrote:

>I want to get a lower back tattoo, and I wonder what a cost to do that.
>
>Since I am novice in this area..

Prices for tattoos are dependent upon size, design, location of
tattoo, location of shop, artist's skill, artist's ego, how obnoxious
the customer is, and the direction of the wind.

The Tattoo FAQ for this group can be found here:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/bodyart/tattoo-faq/

it has many sections, most of them you will find useful.

nj"ass antlers"m

--
"I do not rhyme to that dull elf
Who cannot imagine to himself..."

On May 23, 2:27 pm, Kristine Anne Thopson <kristin...@charter.net>
wrote:
> I want to get a lower back tattoo, and I wonder what a cost to do that.
>
> Since I am novice in this area..

First you have to let us know how big your ass is, how big a skank you
are, and your IQ.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Kristine Anne Thopson wrote:

> > I want to get a lower back tattoo, and
> > I wonder what a cost to do that.
>
> > Since I am novice in this area..
>
> First you have to let us know how big
> your ass is, how big a skank you
> are, and your IQ.

Ever the gentleman. Say, what was that about good versus bad bank or
somesuch? Duh.

Anyway, I'll guess at the answers:

a) Her ass is half the size of Kavin's.
b) She is not a skUnk. She is a woman. A skunk is an animal. Hth. (I
mean that WAS a typo, right, Kav? You'd never insult a woman, would
you?)
c) Her IQ is sufficient that she made the wise decision to visit RAB
for answers to her bodyart-related question. See also N Jill Marsh's
response elsewhere in this thread.

Again, other than the fact that N Jill replied - unlike you -
intelligently, my a), b), and c) replies are mere guesses, however I'd
say they're spot on.

--
Curt

On May 24, 4:19 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:

> Ever the gentleman. Say, what was that about good versus bad bank or
> somesuch? Duh.

And you still don't understand the concept, which shows why there is
no hope for you.

Or, was that just a stretch so you could have a jump off point?
Either way, your hard-on is showing.

>
> Anyway, I'll guess at the answers:
Channeling a female persona again? Yttrx will have to take it back.

> a) Her ass is half the size of Kavin's.

I know you haven't seen my ass. And since your ass couldn't fit into
a pair of 31 inch waist Levi's (as mine can) you really should shut
the fuck up.

> b) She is not a skUnk. She is a woman. A skunk is an animal. Hth. (I
> mean that WAS a typo, right, Kav? You'd never insult a woman, would
> you?)

I'm accepting this is another very poor attempt at humor. Sort of
like your ten posts in another newsgroup about spamming. You are such
a tool.

> c) Her IQ is sufficient that she made the wise decision to visit RAB
> for answers to her bodyart-related question. See also N Jill Marsh's
> response elsewhere in this thread.

Please tell me how those two sentences relate. Did she know Jill
would respond?
>
> Again, other than the fact that N Jill replied - unlike you -
> intelligently, my a), b), and c) replies are mere guesses, however I'd
> say they're spot on.

And you helped her how?

Again, admit it. It's just a hard-on thing. Same when lish posts.
Ray. Nina. Keith when he was alive (Oh, isn't it time for you to
post his death notice again?). God I hope you have a job for the
summer.



Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
[...]

> > <snip> I'll guess at the answers:
<snip>
> > a) Her ass is half the size of Kavin's.
>
> I know you haven't seen my ass.

No complaint from me on that count. Perhaps you missed the word guess
above.

> <snip> couldn't fit into a pair of 31 inch
> waist Levi's (as mine can) you really
> should <snip>

I left my 31 inch waist Levi's in the '80s, thank you. And so far as
"couldn't fit" is concerned, I doubt you have clue one as to what
you're scribbling about, Kavvy. You're, quite possibly, operating
under the illusion of my 37 inch comments in MFW. I can go full Buddha
and achieve a 37, but it's more a cartoon or caricature than what
you'd see if you saw me in clothes or without. Exhale and stand up
straight and it's 35 automatically. And, yes, I suspect a 35 inch
waist can fit in some 31 inch Levi's if I chose to leave my Phat Farm
or Enyce jeans unworn.

I do wear 33 and 34 Levi's - comfortably - when riding as jeans and a
t-shirt go with motorcycles like soda and popcorn go with a night at
the movies.

[...]

> Did she know Jill would respond?

Ask her.

[...]

> And you helped her how?

Ask her.

> <snip> Same when lish posts.

I'm typically respectful of lish, imo. In fact, pointing out broken
links is something that has been appreciated in the past.

> Ray.

We've disagreed. People do that. Welcome to planet Earth, Kav. You got
a Normal Rockwell print from Ray?

> Nina.

I always get her mixed up with N Jill. Regardless, I post while you
complain. Perspective, ymmv, etc., of course.

[...]

> (Oh, isn't it time for you to
> post his death notice again?).

Again?

I didn't initiate that thread, however my R.I.P. page has been online
since soon after the event took place.

http://curtjames.com/_wsn/page5.html

[...]

--
Curt

On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:14:58 -0400, N Jill Marsh wrote:

> Prices for tattoos are dependent upon size, design, location of tattoo,
> location of shop, artist's skill, artist's ego, how obnoxious the
> customer is, and the direction of the wind.

Thank you. This is really help full. I still read about it.

On May 25, 4:41 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:

> I'm typically respectful of lish, imo. In fact, pointing out broken
> links is something that has been appreciated in the past.

Funny. Your pointing them out in public is not designed to be helpful
and you know it. You've been know to use private e-mail to stalk
people, why not use it to be "helpful?"

KT> > Nina.
>
> I always get her mixed up with N Jill.

So are you saying you've meant to disparage N Jill when you were
posting to Nina?

Either way, you aren't denying you're just being a tool to the
regulars.

>Regardless, I post while you
> complain.

No. complaining would imply you were capable of change. Or at
minimal. capable of wanting to change. I make statements. You can
take them as complaints if that helps you. Again, your hard-on.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:

> > I'm typically respectful of lish,
> > imo. In fact, pointing out broken
> > links is something that has been
> > appreciated in the past.
>
> Funny.

Funny? More on that momentarily.

> Your pointing them out in public
> is not designed to be helpful
> and you know it.

(insert innocent kitty eyes here)

Me?

Seriously, grow up, Kavvy. I recognize her for her precision and
intelligence. If I'm pointing out her errors, it's the rare event.
You, however, are known for running into volleyballs and arguing with
me. Taking a lesson from lish might not be a bad idea for you.

> You've been know to use
> private e-mail to stalk

Stalk? Said the man who followed me to MFW? HA! You're right.
"Funny."

> people, why not use it to
> be "helpful?"

Last I emailed her was at her request more or less wrt to an earring
solicitation to RAB patrons.

> KT> > Nina.
>
> > I always get her mixed up
> > with N Jill.
>
> So are you saying you've meant
> to disparage N Jill when you were
> posting to Nina?

What? It's pretty obvious what I meant: They're interchangeable from
my perspective. That's not disparaging, imo. Ymmv.

> Either way, you aren't denying
> you're just being a tool to the
> regulars.

What regulars?

> > Regardless, I post while you
> > complain.
>
> No.

heh :o) Who's the contrarian now?

> complaining would imply
> you were capable of change.

Zat right?

> Or at minimal.

English please.

> capable of wanting to change.

Why don't you change? Rhetorical.

> I make statements.

Good luck with that. ;o)

[...]

--
Curt

On May 27, 5:08 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > So are you saying you've meant
> > to disparage N Jill when you were
> > posting to Nina?
>
> <snip> They're interchangeable from
> my perspective.

Only in the following ways:

-- They are your intellectual superiors

-- Neither would date you


Hth.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > > So are you saying you've meant
> > > to disparage <snip>
>
> > <snip> They're interchangeable from
> > my perspective.
>
> Only in the following ways:
>
> They are your intellectual superiors

Didn't one of them write something about dancing with a pig? If so,
are you my intellectual superior? ;o)

> Neither would date you

Which one looks like the tennis player? I got that rhinoplasty a
billion years ago for a reason. Large noses aren't especially
attractive, imo. Ymmv.

And the other one, I have no clue about her appearance or personality.
Regardless, I appreciate your interest in my dating life. Keep up the
good work.

--
Curt

On May 27, 8:12 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > Neither would date you
>
> Which one looks like the tennis player? I got that rhinoplasty a
> billion years ago for a reason. Large noses aren't especially
> attractive, imo. Ymmv.
>
> And the other one, I have no clue about her appearance or personality.
> Regardless, I appreciate your interest in my dating life. Keep up the
> good work.

So you were too lazy to try to figure out which was which. I guess a
fifty-fifty chance isn't bad is it? Take note people: THAT really is
the best you can hope for in a Curt post.

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com wrote:

> Or, was that just a stretch so you could have a jump off point?

It was probably a gauge.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

On May 30, 4:43 pm, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> KavinTay...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Or, was that just a stretch so you could have a jump off point?
>
> It was probably a gauge.

Smart and clever.

Kavin