ear piercing

On May 30, 9:25 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > Curt wrote:
>
> > <snipped>
>
> You see that, Kavvy? Using my name to attribute a <snip> is like
> "this":
>
> On May 30, 8:12 pm, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> <snip>
>
> Kavin Taylor is a
>
> > Boner.

Another thing they taught you in the six-week journalism school?

Please explain how the <snip> can possibly attributed to you.

You know, you only prove my point more when you stretch like this.

You'd do better to write: "Nuh-uh"


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Please explain how the <snip> can possibly attributed to you.

Think about it.

Think about a question mark, too.

Regardless, while on the topic of <snip>, you snipped the following:

"(Will you reply?)"

Priapism?

--
Curt

On May 31, 5:06 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Please explain how the <snip> can possibly attributed to you.
>
<snip>
>
> Think about a question mark, too.

It wasn't a question, idiot.

Oh, and "be" is missing, not a question mark.

Miss the obvious?

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > > Please explain how the <snip> can possibly attributed to you.
>
> <snip>
>
> > Think about a question mark, too.
>
> It wasn't a question, idiot.

Like I said - think about it.

> Oh, and "be" is missing, not
> a question mark.

And you apparently did. ;o)

> Miss the obvious?

And there's the requested question mark, too. Well done, Kavvy.

Well, kinda.

> Kavin

--
Curt