After My First Tattoo (some questions)

On Jun 18, 3:13 am, Marian <marian.rosenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 10:34 am, dhrr...@ohatzhapu.bet (The Queen of Cans and
>
> Jars) wrote:
> > There you go, stupid cow. Now you can stop making excuses for ignoring
> > good advice!
>
> I won't spite myself by ignoring your advice but you are such an
> incredibly rude person that I truly wish you hadn't given good advice
> so that I could afford to ignore and forget you.
>
> -M

That is "incredibly" rude?


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Really, go away. If that is what you're teaching your pupils, no
wonder your contract was cancelled.

Really, the cows should be offended.

Kavin

On Jun 18, 11:48 am, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I thought she offered a copy and paste of some
> info and then called you a stupid cow. Not so difficult to ignore and
> forget that, imo.

Good, so now you see the value in your little endeavors?

Oh, but wait! The Queen had permission to post her little cut and
paste. You, you violate copyright laws. Typical.

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:

> Really, the cows should be offended.

MOO

Marian <marian.rosenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
M> I won't spite myself by ignoring your advice but you are such an
M> incredibly rude person that I truly wish you hadn't given good advice
M> so that I could afford to ignore and forget you.

queen & i are different people who both determined you to be a
stupid cow.

that said, if you had just THANKED ME in the first place, you
never would have been insulted. neglecting to appreciate my helpful advice
in the first place is in itself rude. here, have a mirror.

lish "the sword of truth
crank@got.net is just another weapon." -nmn
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 11:48 am, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > <snip> copy and paste <snip> Not so difficult to ignore <snip>
>
> Good, so now you see the value in your little endeavors?

Correction. Not so difficult for SOME to ignore. ;o)

HA!

--
Curt

On Jun 18, 8:20 pm, c...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.) wrote:

re Marian <marian.rosenb...@gmail.com>

[...]

> queen & i are different people who both determined you to be a
> stupid cow.

Hmmm. Actually, lisheep would be the term I'd apply. You apparently
determined the OP to be a stupid cow whereas Queen simply fell in
line.

Hth.

--
Curt

On Jun 18, 11:48 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marian wrote:
> > <snip>(The Queen of Cans and Jars) wrote:
> > > There you go, stupid cow. Now you can stop making excuses for ignoring
> > > good advice!
>
> > I won't spite myself by ignoring your advice but you are such an
> > incredibly rude person that I truly wish you hadn't given good advice
> > so that I could afford to ignore and forget you.
>
> She gave good advice? I thought she offered a copy and paste of some
> info and then called you a stupid cow. Not so difficult to ignore and
> forget that, imo.

The info in the copy and paste was good advice.

> Anyway, how's your tattoo now?

Looking good. Colors are uniformly nice and dark. Shading looks even
better than it did originally now that I have gotten over the shock of
it being on my body and can dispassionately investigate it up close.
Bit tingly itchy along one of the scars (relating to nerve damage).

Strangely enough although the heavily scarred tissue which was used as
the site for the thorns to grow out of took the ink fine the "swollen
bruise" on the lightly scarred tissue around the site didn't. Doesn't
look like a bruise at all any more. I'm currently ambivalent on what
to do about this ... on the one hand it's "prettier" without the
bruise (which is as gone as if it had been a real bruise that healed),
one the other hand it was more artistic and trompe l'oeil with the
bruise.

-M

On Jun 19, 6:41 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jun 18, 3:13 am, Marian <marian.rosenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 15, 10:34 am, dhrr...@ohatzhapu.bet (The Queen of Cans and
>
> > Jars) wrote:
> > > There you go, stupid cow. Now you can stop making excuses for ignoring
> > > good advice!
>
> > I won't spite myself by ignoring your advice but you are such an
> > incredibly rude person that I truly wish you hadn't given good advice
> > so that I could afford to ignore and forget you.
>
> > -M
>
> That is "incredibly" rude?

Some people persist in believing in that which is called the civil
society. This is a place where people do not randomly call other
people things or

> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

laugh at them.

> Really, go away. If that is what you're teaching your pupils, no
> wonder your contract was cancelled.

Since I have mentioned many places online about various jobs I have
had I will assume that you are talking about my recent stint as a
college teacher. The school was supposed to apply for the right to
hire me before I started working for them not after and ... well ...
things happen. My contract was not canceled. Legally it never
existed in the first place because they didn't have the right to sign
it with me until after permission they had not yet applied for had
been granted. When permission was retroactively applied for it wasn't
granted therefore the contract was never signed in the first place and
they were still reasonable enough people to -offer- me money (as
stipulated by the contract that didn't exist) for breaking their word.

They've expressed interest in following the rules this time and
applying for permission ahead of time to hire me next term. Hardly a
canceled contract.

-M

On Jun 15, 4:41 pm, c...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.) wrote:
> Marian <marian.rosenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> M> On Jun 15, 2:07 am, c...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.) wrote:>> READ, YOU STUPID COW.
> >> http://compunction.org/healing.txt
>
> M> I read everything on the page. It said:
> M> Problem loading page X
>
> you're the only one having a problem. what else is new.
>
> M> and please don't call me a stupid cow, it isn't very nice.
>
> i call them as i see them. i posted my link for you once already,
> & you didn't even respond to thank me.


Fuck off.

-M

On Jun 19, 1:23 am, Marian <marian.rosenb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Fuck off.

after she wrote in a previous post:

"Some people persist in believing in that which is called the civil
society. This is a place where people do not randomly call other
people things or

laugh at them. "

Obviously you aren't one of them.

Stupid whining Cunt.

No, rude cuntnugget.

Kavin

>> itches that's normal and you use self-control to not scratch it. You
>> are throwing away the money you put into this tattoo by gooping it up
>> the way you're doing. At the very least you will need a touch up.

>Please explain to me the why behind this. I'm curious. Why is it
>leaking color? Not a whole lot at first and even less now but
>definitely color coming out in my sweat (noticeable on the top of my
>sock from Sunday, didn't see it before) ...

Itching is a normal part of healing any wound/ abrasion.

By gooping up your tattoo you are not allowing the ink to settle and
be trapped under your skin. you are helping your body push out the
foreign substance. When that happens your tattoo will "leak color"

Some ink stained plasma (tattoo "sweat")is normal with properly cared
for, properly applied tattoos, within the first 24, esp. with lower
body tattoos. Because of your extended use of petroleum based
products, seeing it a few days later is no big surprise.

Do some research on proper sterile enviroments, and be able to
recognize them before allowing anyone else to preform work on you,
ESPECIALLY in lower income parts of the world.

oh, yea....and get tested for hepatitis NOW!!!!!

follow scamps advice, and you'll be fine.

Marian <marian.rosenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
M> Fuck off.

like i said.

lish "& it means half as much
crank@got.net as it used to to me." -mm
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> On Jun 19, 1:23 am, Marian <marian.rosenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Fuck off.
Kgc> after she wrote in a previous post:
Kgc> "Some people persist in believing in that which is called the civil
Kgc> society. This is a place where people do not randomly call other
Kgc> people things or
Kgc> laugh at them. "
Kgc> Obviously you aren't one of them.
Kgc> Stupid whining Cunt.
Kgc> No, rude cuntnugget.

rude, /hypocritical/ cuntnugget.

ps, that's another quarter!

lish "i like your tattooed
crank@got.net convictions." -ar
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 1:23 am, Marian <marian.rosenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Fuck off.
>
> after she wrote in a previous post:
>
> "Some people persist in believing in that which is called the civil
> society. This is a place where people do not randomly call other
> people things or
>
> laugh at them. "

So she's shown discourtesy and you expect her to respond with
courtesy? Possible but atypical, imo.

> Obviously you aren't one of them.

heh :o)

And you are?

--
Curt