Labret ball on tight, tips on getting it loose?

On Jul 16, 2:06 pm, adamting...@gmail.com wrote:

> Jesus Christ to both of you guys... this is for you, more Kavin thohttp://static.flickr.com/75/195983063_e380efd610.jpg- Hide quoted text -

Yet you keep coming back.

Is it better to be the retard, or the one taking advice from the
retard?

Kavin

On Jul 16, 10:47 am, adamting...@gmail.com wrote:

> haha, wow. catch you on a bad day? theyre my teeth dude not yours

Heh.

Sweetheart, if you think this is a bad day, you really are fucked.

Instead of "trying" to be clever, perhaps the wiser stance would have
been to ask why I think your teeth are in jeopardy.

Go ahead, ask Curt. He's had a labret. Twice. Yeah, listen to him.
Trust me, you'll be happy.

And look at my recent post to newbies. Live it.

Kavin

On Jul 16, 12:44 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:

> > By the way, why didn't you include the OP's statement?
> > I'll answer it for you.
>
> See? You don't have questions.

Dipshit, it is still a question. But you have just proven why I
NEEDED to answer it for you.


>Too busy answering for others instead
> of listening. You're closed to discussion.

And you just discussed how? Bitching is not discussing.

Funny, you didn't argue the point that I said "Integrity" and you
changed it to "social skills."

No argument on your mediocrity, either.

Yeah, you can teach me a lot about discussion. A lot.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > > By the way, why didn't you include the OP's statement?
> > > I'll answer it for you.
>
> > See? You don't have questions.
>
> Dipshit,

There are those social skills again.

> it is still a question.

Of what use is a question if your mind's already made up, Kavin?

> But you have just proven why I NEEDED to answer it for you.

Right. Need and not choice. That's odd.

> > Too busy answering for others instead of listening. You're
> > closed to discussion.
>
> And you just discussed how?

That's just it. We're not having a discussion, are we?

> Bitching is not discussing.

There you go. Write that on an index card and tape it to your mirror.

> Funny, you didn't argue the point that I said "Integrity" and you
> changed it to "social skills."

Changed it? I wrote a post in reply to your comment. You don't
remember what you wrote?

(snaps fingers)

You okay, Kav?

> No argument on your mediocrity, either.

Is it really necessary to argue with someone who says the sky is plaid
and filled with flying unicorns?

> Yeah, you can teach me a lot about discussion. A lot.

Cool. Then we're making progress.

--
Curt

On Jul 16, 3:46 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
>
> [...]

> > Is it better to be the retard, or the one taking advice from the
> > retard?

hahaha ... if i knew you were a retard i would have never came here

adamting...@gmail wrote:
[...]

> hahaha ... if i knew you were a retard i would have never came here

Your use of the term retard as an apparent pejorative is less than
impressive.

Kavin may be a pill, but that's no reason to stoop to name calling.
Fwiw, unsolicited two cents and, hey, good luck with your lip.

--
Curt

On Jul 16, 3:46 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

That boner must really be hurting.

Answering a response to someone else.

Don't you think he is capable? Or do you think your response will be
more "clever?"

Kavin

On Jul 16, 4:35 pm, adamting...@gmail.com wrote:

> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > > Is it better to be the retard, or the one taking advice from the
> > > retard?
>
> hahaha ... if i knew you were a retard i would have never came here

I didn't claim either, did I?

But my advice hasn't been wrong. None of it.

And have you noticed, Curt hasn't been on your side. He's just been
bitching at me. Not one reply to you. Not one at all.

Cheers, buddy. Happy healing.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

Fwiw, the OP's attribution is much like your own. He included my name
when replying to your quote recently, however none of my words were
included.

> That boner must really be hurting.

Clever and boner are apparently your two most favorite words.

> Answering a response to someone else.

Are you this forum's moderator? Please advise.

> Don't you think he is capable? Or do you think your response will be
> more "clever?"

This is where leaving a snippet of text to which you're replying might
have proved useful. ;o)

--
Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> On Jul 16, 4:35 pm, adamting...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]

> > hahaha ... if i knew you were a retard i would have never came here
>
> I didn't claim either, did I?
>
> But my advice hasn't been wrong. None of it.

The delivery of that advice, however, has been lacking, imo.

> And have you noticed, Curt hasn't been on your side.

On what did you base that opinion? I mean, you said I hadn't replied
to the OP, right?

> He's just been bitching at me.

Opinion.

> Not one reply to you. Not one at all.

Oh, there's been one reply. Wrt his use of the term retarded.

But other than that, I chose not to reply to his posts as I've never
had a lip piercing and he said the issue was resolved. Got that?

[...]

--
Curt

On Jul 16, 5:36 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But other than that, I chose not to reply to his posts as I've never
> had a lip piercing

And not having a particular piercing has stopped you in the past?

No.

Kavin

On Jul 16, 4:48 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> adamting...@gmail wrote:
>
> [...]
> Kavin may be a pill, but that's no reason to stoop to name calling.
> Fwiw, unsolicited two cents and, hey, good luck with your lip.

Thanks Curt.... because of my experience with Kavin i will never come
here again... bye forever.

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
>
> > But other than that, I chose not to reply to his posts as I've never
> > had a lip piercing
>
> And not having a particular piercing has stopped you in the past?

You tell me. You're the one apparently writing my unauthorized
biography.

> No.

Example?

--
Curt

adamting...@gmail wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > adamting...@gmail wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > <snip> that's no reason to stoop to name calling.
> > Fwiw, unsolicited two cents and, hey, good luck
> > with your lip.
>
> Thanks Curt....

You're welcome.

> <snip> bye forever.

Little heavy on the melodrama. Don't stay away forever. Come back.
Bring friends. ;o)

--
Curt

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:30:14 -0000, in rec.arts.bodyart,
adamtingley@gmail.com wrote:

>On Jul 16, 4:48 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> adamting...@gmail wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> Kavin may be a pill, but that's no reason to stoop to name calling.
>> Fwiw, unsolicited two cents and, hey, good luck with your lip.
>
>Thanks Curt.... because of my experience with Kavin i will never come
>here again... bye forever.

With results like this, I can't see why people still say that RAB isn't as
good as it used to be.

-Scott
--
This line signals Logical End-Of-Message.
Physical End-Of-Message follows.