![]() |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|||||||
| rec.arts.bodyart USENET newgroup for general Body Art discussion. (Disclaimer) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Nina Baltes" <chaotropic@gmx.de> wrote in message news:46c5c603$0$29377$4c56b896@news-read1.lambdanet.net... > Valaama wrote: > >> I have no tattoos. > > You've stated you intend to get one. > >> And I do not deliberately dress provocative in church. > > Riiiight. > >> That's defamation and libel. > > Not if you said it yourself. > > <1187221732.543918.216820@m37g2000prh.googlegroups .com> > "(...) Fine, I will be a matushka who wants to get her > cartilage, eyebrow, lower lip, nipples, navel and labia pierced and > who wants to get a tramp stamp of her mushroom with sexual connotation > as a tramp stamp. Maybe that will cure the church and the world of > wanting to make a matushka out of me. And I like to push the envelope > in terms of my dress in church, although when I am reprimanded I amend > my ways immediately. So far I have only been reprimanded three times > since I joined my new parish. That's pretty good. (...) One time I got > rebuked by a friend for wearing sexy shoes to Vigil, a pair of black high > heel open toed Nine west pumps with white shoe laces." > > Which devout churchgoer needs to be reminded how to dress, again and > again? > > You're going to hell, Atlanta. And there is no earthly prayer that can > save you at this point. Satan has his special "acanthoid intruder" ready > for you. He told me so Himself. > How many Atlantas are there in usenet land? Is there a place where Atlanta is a common name?... Am I waving to the same Atlanta? I don't change my tag, so you should know who I am if you are the same. |
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
yttrx wrote:
> Valaama <olympiada2007@gmail.com> wrote: >> Nina Baltes wrote: >>> Patrick wrote: >>> >>>> First you tell me to "eff off," (or was it to go "eff myself?") then >>>> you thank me for telling you about BME. >>> She deliberately dresses provocatively in church, gets pierced and >>> 'tatted' even though it's frowned upon by the community that allegedly >>> means so much to her- what do you expect? >>> >>> Nina >> I have no tattoos. And I do not deliberately dress provocative in >> church. That's defamation and libel. I only have a nose piercing and two >> ear piercings, one in each ear. What is your problem? > > Valaama: > > You are a promiscuous, dirty whore. You're breathtakingly unqualified > for everything you attempt, you lie, you cheat, you steal, and you beat > animals. > > Is that pretty good for defamation and libel? Please advise. > > > > > -----yttrx > > > Yep. I am opening a case with the FBI. Thanks. |
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Aug 21, 10:01 pm, Valaama <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yttrx wrote: YTT> > Is that pretty good for defamation and libel? Please advise. VO> Yep. I am opening a case with the FBI. Thanks Sweetums, I think they already have a file on you. As does the Metropolitan -- well, actually, he just has you in his little black book. As do a few priests and some congregants. Oh, and the Pope. He has you listed under whore. And cunt nugget. Kavin |
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> And cunt nugget. $0.25 due lish "i'm sorry for crushing crank@got.net your frilly pink eggshell of a psyche." -mc 43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70 |
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Valaama" <olympiada2007@gmail.com> wrote in message news:fag5eg$dt1$1@registered.motzarella.org... > yttrx wrote: >> Valaama <olympiada2007@gmail.com> wrote: >> You are a promiscuous, dirty whore. You're breathtakingly unqualified >> for everything you attempt, you lie, you cheat, you steal, and you beat >> animals. Is that pretty good for defamation and libel? Please advise. >> >> >> >> >> -----yttrx >> >> >> > Yep. I am opening a case with the FBI. Thanks.\\ Um, apparently you missed a few civics lessons there sweetie, libel , defamation and slander are not subject to the criminal code, You seem to have a need to continually prove your ignorance. |