![]() |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|||||||
| rec.arts.bodyart USENET newgroup for general Body Art discussion. (Disclaimer) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:34:14 +0000, Tim Chmielewski wrote:
> Terri <Terri@micron.net> wrote in news:4i2cd7F1qppfU1@individual.net: > > >>> http://tinyurl.com/gzza7 >> Note to self: when Mark says "Not Safe for Work" he means >> NOT SAFE FOR WORK! >> I'm very skeptical. Either that is photoshopped or that woman has >> NO PAIN RECEPTORS! > > That was obviously part of the kink for her, do you have to have everything > spelt out for you? Kink aside. I think that anyone who would choose that particular design must possess a great deal of contempt toward their sexual partner(s). |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Steven Jennings Bryan" <bstevens@iquest.net> wrote in message news:pan.2006.07.18.04.28.53.246222@bstevens.iques t.net... > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:34:14 +0000, Tim Chmielewski wrote: > >> Terri <Terri@micron.net> wrote in news:4i2cd7F1qppfU1@individual.net: >> >> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/gzza7 >>> Note to self: when Mark says "Not Safe for Work" he means >>> NOT SAFE FOR WORK! >>> I'm very skeptical. Either that is photoshopped or that woman has >>> NO PAIN RECEPTORS! >> >> That was obviously part of the kink for her, do you have to have >> everything >> spelt out for you? > > Kink aside. I think that anyone who would choose that particular design > must possess a great deal of contempt toward their sexual partner(s). > Is there any truth to the rumor/saying "girls who have devils tattooed on their crotch poke?" |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Steven Jennings Bryan" <bstevens@iquest.net> wrote in message news:pan.2006.07.18.04.28.53.246222@bstevens.iques t.net... > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:34:14 +0000, Tim Chmielewski wrote: > >> Terri <Terri@micron.net> wrote in news:4i2cd7F1qppfU1@individual.net: >> >> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/gzza7 >>> Note to self: when Mark says "Not Safe for Work" he means >>> NOT SAFE FOR WORK! >>> I'm very skeptical. Either that is photoshopped or that woman has >>> NO PAIN RECEPTORS! >> >> That was obviously part of the kink for her, do you have to have >> everything >> spelt out for you? > > Kink aside. I think that anyone who would choose that particular design > must possess a great deal of contempt toward their sexual partner(s). > Is there any truth to the rumor/saying that "girls who have devils tattoed on their crotch poke" |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Played Part wrote:
> "Steven Jennings Bryan" <bstevens@iquest.net> wrote in message > news:pan.2006.07.18.04.28.53.246222@bstevens.iques t.net... > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:34:14 +0000, Tim Chmielewski wrote: > > > >> Terri <Terri@micron.net> wrote in news:4i2cd7F1qppfU1@individual.net: > >> > >> > >>>> http://tinyurl.com/gzza7 > >>> Note to self: when Mark says "Not Safe for Work" he means > >>> NOT SAFE FOR WORK! > >>> I'm very skeptical. Either that is photoshopped or that woman has > >>> NO PAIN RECEPTORS! > >> > >> That was obviously part of the kink for her, do you have to have > >> everything > >> spelt out for you? > > > > Kink aside. I think that anyone who would choose that particular design > > must possess a great deal of contempt toward their sexual partner(s). > > > > Is there any truth to the rumor/saying "girls who have devils tattooed on > their crotch poke?" No. But they do smoke. |