custom made jewelry

Every piece of jewelry should be as unique as the person who wears
it.
Jewelry should tell stories, spark conversations, and make wearers
feel special. But when you're shopping among mass-produced
collections
in retail jewelry stores, it's hard to find pieces you can really
connect with. That's why I offer custom-made jewelry - because it's
just for you.

www.tektonjewelry.com


Using the latest in 3D modeling technology, your most complex ideas
can come to life. I will create photorealistic images for your
approval even before production begins. Want to change things around,
want to see it in another metal, or with another stone? No problem!
Once the design is approved, I will begin manufacturing. From idea to
finished product, I will precisely create what you are looking for.


tektonjewelry.com
302-753-2816


john

john wrote:
> Every piece of jewelry should be as unique as the person who wears
> it.
> Jewelry should tell stories, spark conversations, and make wearers
> feel special. But when you're shopping among mass-produced
> collections
> in retail jewelry stores, it's hard to find pieces you can really
> connect with. That's why I offer custom-made jewelry - because it's
> just for you.

Not only is your message spam, your "past creations" are not even
pictures of actual pieces of (non-piercing) jewelry, but computer
generated models. Lame!

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

On Sep 13, 4:04 pm, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> john wrote:
> > Every piece of jewelry should be as unique as the person who wears
> > it.
> > Jewelry should tell stories, spark conversations, and make wearers
> > feel special. <snip>


> Not only is your message spam, your "past creations" are not even
> pictures of actual pieces of (non-piercing) jewelry, but computer
> generated models. Lame!

And yet can you fault his ability to "spark conversations"?

Seems, at the very least, he made you seem "special" enough to
comment.


--
Curt

On Sep 13, 4:04 pm, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
NB> Lame!


He's the tat of the jewelry business.

But I'm sure he'll be supported by someone just as lame as himself.
Wait, he already has been.

Kavin

On Sep 14, 9:57 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sep 13, 4:04 pm, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> NB> Lame!

re "john" and www.tektonjewelry.com

> He's the tat of the jewelry business.

Looks more like a guy who is attempting a start-up without inventory.
You call it lame while others might call it an inexpensive way to
advertise a possible however unlikely jewelry store.

> But I'm sure he'll be supported by someone just as lame as himself.
> Wait, he already has been.
>
> Kavin

Right. Your post simply underlines what I offered elsewhere in this
thread.

A tat or lame he may just be, however how can you fault his ability to
"spark conversations"?

And although, yeah, I'm certain you *will* be able to find fault, you
were apparently made to feel "special" enough to comment as well. Do
you feel special, Kavvy, or are you just an unhappy guy waiting around
for that inevitable next volleyball to mug you?

--
Curt

On Sep 13, 4:04 pm, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
NB> Not only is your message spam, your "past creations" are not even
NB> pictures of actual pieces of (non-piercing) jewelry, but computer
NB> generated models. Lame!

Did you expect him to be creative, considering his spam is the exact
copy from his website?

As creative as a tattoo of a once-popular cartoon.


Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com wrote:

> Did you expect him to be creative, considering his spam is the exact
> copy from his website?

Actually, no. I don't remember any spammer ever offering anything
remotely useful.

> As creative as a tattoo of a once-popular cartoon.

You mean a tat.

Him and Miss Pinky Flaps would make such a cute couple.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

On Sep 15, 12:37 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
[...]

> As creative as a tattoo of a once-popular cartoon.

Once? As in no longer, Kavin?

I'm sure Andrews McMeel Publishing would differ with you on that
statement. Oh, and probably Universal Press Syndicate, too. Just
maaaaaaybe.

Regardless, you're ever my publicist.

http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/calvin.html

Thanks, pal!

And, yes, the image is a pleaser for me whether you consider the
characters popular or not.

Hth? ;o)

--
Curt

On Sep 15, 4:11 am, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> KavinTay...@gmail.com wrote:
KT> > As creative as a tattoo of a once-popular cartoon.
>
NB> You mean a tat.

You're right. Taz should never be considered a tattoo.

Kavin