Ping Grant AKA Insanity Inspector

1. Being stalked is not a good thing. I would not wish it on anyone.
2. It is a felony to encourage someone to commit suicide in the state
of California. You have done so in email after I told you to stop
abusing me in email. I have spam blocked our conversation so that you
may be prevented from committing any further felonies against me.
3. If you wish me to stop posting in your newsgroup, than stop
harassing me. I have known about body modification for a long time,
but it is not that important to me so I can let go of it. I hope. It
might offend my priesthood and they are very important to me.

On Sep 29, 2:35 am, Madam <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
CRAZY> 1. Being stalked is not a good thing. I would not wish it on
anyone.

The government looking into the welfare of your child is not
considered stalking.

CRAZY> 2. It is a felony to encourage someone to commit suicide in the
state
CRAZY> of California. You have done so in email after I told you to
stop
CRAZY> abusing me in email. I have spam blocked our conversation so
that you
CRAZY> may be prevented from committing any further felonies against
me.

It should be a felony for you to exist.

CRAZY> 3. If you wish me to stop posting in your newsgroup, than stop
CRAZY> harassing me.

Here's a suggestion: Turn your computer off. Unless you were stupid
enough to post your phone number (which you very well might have
been), you can't be "harassed" unless you are computer active.


CRAZY>I have known about body modification for a long time,
CRAZY> but it is not that important to me so I can let go of it. I
hope. It
CRAZY> might offend my priesthood and they are very important to me.

No they aren't. And you don't follow your religion. Prepare for Hell
baby, 'cause that's your destination.

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com wrote:

> CRAZY>I have known about body modification for a long time,
> CRAZY> but it is not that important to me so I can let go of it. I
> hope. It
> CRAZY> might offend my priesthood and they are very important to me.
>
> No they aren't. And you don't follow your religion. Prepare for Hell
> baby, 'cause that's your destination.

From what I hear, she posted some pictures to iam that may very well
make her priests go blind.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

On Sep 29, 8:45 am, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> KavinTay...@gmail.com wrote:
> > CRAZY>I have known about body modification for a long time,
> > CRAZY> but it is not that important to me so I can let go of it. I
> > hope. It
> > CRAZY> might offend my priesthood and they are very important to me.
>
> > No they aren't. And you don't follow your religion. Prepare for Hell
> > baby, 'cause that's your destination.
>
> From what I hear, she posted some pictures to iam that may very well
> make her priests go blind.
>
> Nina
> --
> C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
> Louis Pasteurhttp://www.chaotropic.net

I deleted them. Because of the fact I know someone could have
downloaded them and post them elsewhere. I posted them in two forums
designed for that kind of photographs plus on my own page because I
was asking photographs about tattoos and piercings. That's my
business. If someone has downloaded those photographs and is going to
post them elsewhere, that is no reflection on me. Those photographs
were appropriate for those venues. My priests are all married. They
see those objects on a daily basis. And I don't show them to anyone
other than the body modification community. This is exactly what I
foresaw coming. There are photographs of women masturbating on that
community, snatch shots, porn shots. I posted none of those. Again,
why am I being targeted? There is nothing against tattoos and
piercings in the canons and my priests don't need to know about what I
am planning. I am shocked that people in IAM would gossip. I have a
lot of buddies in that community, almost 50, and they will speak in my
defense if need be. I am in touch with some of them outside of IAM.
They were hot photographs and hot photographs do not make priests go
blind. There are 15,000 people in that community. Again, why am I
being targeted? There is a forum for Christians in that community. Why
am I being targeted? Why do you hate me so much? I foresaw IAM
shutting down which is why I deleted all my photographs and my journal
entries. I have the gift of foresight.

On Sep 29, 3:50 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2:35 am, Madam <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CRAZY> 1. Being stalked is not a good thing. I would not wish it on
> anyone.
>
> The government looking into the welfare of your child is not
> considered stalking.
>
The government is not looking into the welfare of my child. The
government closed the case. It was based on false allegations. The
government has not contacted me again. But I will be writing to my
Senator's staff about this issue. People feel entitled to harass me on
the Internet because they hate me. Hate crimes are illegal. I have so
much work to do that I have not had time to write to my Senator's
staff yet but I will. And I will include messages like yours.
My child is well taken care of by me, her father, my friends, and the
parents in her school whose children really like her. I don't trust
the government. Although they told me they would not contact me again,
given the level of harassment they are receiving from my stalkers, I
would not be surprised if they blamed me, the victim. Police have been
known to blame rape victims. This is no different.
> CRAZY> 3. If you wish me to stop posting in your newsgroup, than stop
> CRAZY> harassing me.
>
> Here's a suggestion: Turn your computer off. Unless you were stupid
> enough to post your phone number (which you very well might have
> been), you can't be "harassed" unless you are computer active.
>
I never posted my phone number. Someone else did. Don't you get it
yet? I am being stalked.
> CRAZY>I have known about body modification for a long time,
> CRAZY> but it is not that important to me so I can let go of it. I
> hope. It
> CRAZY> might offend my priesthood and they are very important to me.
>
> No they aren't. And you don't follow your religion. Prepare for Hell
> baby, 'cause that's your destination.
>
> Kavin
My priests are the most important men in the world to me. The ones I
need to trust first. You are defaming me. That is illegal.
Atlanta

On Sep 29, 5:39 pm, Madam <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>You are defaming me.

This assumes you has some sort of fame to start with.

d

Madam wrote:

> blind. There are 15,000 people in that community. Again, why am I
> being targeted? There is a forum for Christians in that community. Why
> am I being targeted? Why do you hate me so much?

Hate you? That would imply that your existence has some kind of
significance to me personally. It does not. I pity you, and I believe
you should have more important things to do than trying to "protect" or
"restore" a reputation that you never had to begin with.

> I foresaw IAM
> shutting down which is why I deleted all my photographs and my journal
> entries. I have the gift of foresight.

Right. Your gift of foresight has not helped you any in foreseeing the
mess you've brought upon yourself by starting to post to usenet, has it?

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

On Sep 30, 5:51 am, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Madam wrote:

CRAZY> > I foresaw IAM
CRAZY> > shutting down which is why I deleted all my photographs and
my journal
CRAZY> > entries. I have the gift of foresight.
>
NB> Right. Your gift of foresight has not helped you any in foreseeing
the
NB> mess you've brought upon yourself by starting to post to usenet,
has it?

Madam Atlanta Crazypants posts on this subject are eerily reminiscent
of a certain member of RAB's postings following the death of KA.

Funny how some people try to raise their perceived status in the wake
of others' problems.

I'm thinking someone else needs to be added to my list of people who
should be dead.

Kavin

On Sep 30, 12:14 pm, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
[...]
> of a certain member of RAB's postings following the death of KA.
>
> Funny how some people try to raise their perceived status in the wake
> of others' problems.
[...]

Whatever I posted (as I recall simply information as noted 'here'
http://curtjames.com/_wsn/page5.html - plus a genuine note of regret
on his passing) was not to "raise their perceived status" at all, but
instead my reaction to the loss.

You've got one thing right, however, it certainly is funny how some
people (you for instance) try to raise their perceived status in the
wake of others' (the current and apparently insane visitor's)
problems.

Please tell me all about semicolons, okay?

Tia!

--
Curt

KavinTaylor@gmail.com wrote:

> Madam Atlanta Crazypants posts on this subject are eerily reminiscent
> of a certain member of RAB's postings following the death of KA.

She certainly has the "it's all about MEEEEE" attitude, but it's nowhere
near as disgusting. More sad, really.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

Nina Baltes <chaotropic@gmx.de> wrote:
NB> KavinTaylor@gmail.com wrote:
>> Madam Atlanta Crazypants posts on this subject are eerily reminiscent
>> of a certain member of RAB's postings following the death of KA.
NB> She certainly has the "it's all about MEEEEE" attitude, but it's nowhere
NB> near as disgusting. More sad, really.

yeah, only i can really pull that off with an air of veracity. :D

lish "forget it," he said.
crank@got.net "oral sex gives me amnesia." -sk
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

On Sep 30, 1:21 pm, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> KavinTay...@gmail.com wrote:
> > <snip> posts on this subject are eerily reminiscent
> > of a certain member of RAB's postings following the <snip>.

Gee, "member of RAB's" has a nice ring to it.

> <snip> certainly has the "it's all about MEEEEE" attitude, but <snip>

What's your post about, Nina? All about you, yes? Your perception,
interpretation, opinion. You are your own brand, right? Naaaah. It's
*not* about you. I'm wrong. It's all about me. Gotcha. And you're
simply yet generously offering me an opportunity to reply.
Appreciated!

--

i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:

> yeah, only i can really pull that off with an air of veracity. :D

Well, it IS your newsgroup, after all :D

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

Nina Baltes wrote:
> Madam wrote:
>
>> blind. There are 15,000 people in that community. Again, why am I
>> being targeted? There is a forum for Christians in that community. Why
>> am I being targeted? Why do you hate me so much?
>
> Hate you? That would imply that your existence has some kind of
> significance to me personally. It does not. I pity you, and I believe
> you should have more important things to do than trying to "protect" or
> "restore" a reputation that you never had to begin with.
>
>> I foresaw IAM
>> shutting down which is why I deleted all my photographs and my journal
>> entries. I have the gift of foresight.
>
> Right. Your gift of foresight has not helped you any in foreseeing the
> mess you've brought upon yourself by starting to post to usenet, has it?
>
> Nina
You are extremely abusive. You have no idea what my reputation is in
real life. It is not threatened by the crap posted about me on Usenet.
This is strictly an internet phenomenon. Its absolutely horrendous. I
saw what was coming to IAM, that is why I deleted almost all of my
photographs, my posts in groups, and my journals. I fled. I evacuated.
My instincts told me an earthquake or a storm was coming and I was able
to get out of there before it hit. I bet Shannon would believe me.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Nina Baltes <chaotropic@gmx.de> wrote:
NB> i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
>> yeah, only i can really pull that off with an air of veracity. :D
NB> Well, it IS your newsgroup, after all :D

DON'T YOU FORGET IT.

lish "ask me the questions
crank@got.net you never want answers to." -we
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70