IAM Back. well, maybe not.

On Oct 2, 6:51 pm, Miss Pixxie Styx <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nina Baltes wrote:
> > P. wrote:
>
> >> If I may ask, who gave you this 'startling' info? Rachel? Jon?
> >> Shannon? They would be the only true source for this.
>
> > I predict she's going to claim that Shannon is her boyfriend shortly.
> > She has a thing for bearded men.
>
> > Nina
>
> I understand that Shannon has a girlfriend already, he brought her to
> mod prom. You can see our public exchange on his blog and ask him about
> me if you wish. We have nothing special, we are just internet
> acquaintances. He is still married and I am celibate. There is nothing
> there.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

I see that you opted not to answer my questions...just deny being
Shannon's GF. That's fine but I do want to refer you to the TOS
agreement on BME/IAM and I quote:

"Instant Messages are private, but recent IM logs may be examined in
cases of dispute or other TOS violations.
BME may keep detailed logs of ALL activities on this site
BME will not release these details to either the public or other
companies unless legally required to do so.
BME may use this information to improve your experience at IAM or BME.
You agree not to hack or compromise the security or functionality of
the site in any way and to report any vulnerabilities you discover.
Any user doing this will be removed immediately.
While we do our best to protect the site's security, it could in
theory get hacked and move these details out of our control.."

Which was updated....again I quote:

"These rules and guidelines are subject to change without notice --
last updated December 11th, 2002"

That is the entire Privicy section to the TOS that has not been
redacted. As you can see, monitoring of IAM goes back at least 4
years if not longer. So if you really honestly believe that
monitoring activities weren't going on until recently....you are quite
naive.
Again I wish you well in both BME/IAM and BodyTwo.com.

On Oct 2, 4:26 pm, "P." <psf...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Oct 2, 6:51 pm, Miss Pixxie Styx <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Nina Baltes wrote:
> > > P. wrote:
>
> > >> If I may ask, who gave you this 'startling' info? Rachel? Jon?
> > >> Shannon? They would be the only true source for this.
>
> > > I predict she's going to claim that Shannon is her boyfriend shortly.
> > > She has a thing for bearded men.
>
> > > Nina
>
> > I understand that Shannon has a girlfriend already, he brought her to
> > mod prom. You can see our public exchange on his blog and ask him about
> > me if you wish. We have nothing special, we are just internet
> > acquaintances. He is still married and I am celibate. There is nothing
> > there.
>
> > --
> > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
>
> I see that you opted not to answer my questions...just deny being
> Shannon's GF. That's fine but I do want to refer you to the TOS
> agreement on BME/IAM and I quote:
>
> "Instant Messages are private, but recent IM logs may be examined in
> cases of dispute or other TOS violations.
> BME may keep detailed logs of ALL activities on this site
> BME will not release these details to either the public or other
> companies unless legally required to do so.
> BME may use this information to improve your experience at IAM or BME.
> You agree not to hack or compromise the security or functionality of
> the site in any way and to report any vulnerabilities you discover.
> Any user doing this will be removed immediately.
> While we do our best to protect the site's security, it could in
> theory get hacked and move these details out of our control.."
>
> Which was updated....again I quote:
>
> "These rules and guidelines are subject to change without notice --
> last updated December 11th, 2002"
>
> That is the entire Privicy section to the TOS that has not been
> redacted. As you can see, monitoring of IAM goes back at least 4
> years if not longer. So if you really honestly believe that
> monitoring activities weren't going on until recently....you are quite
> naive.
> Again I wish you well in both BME/IAM and BodyTwo.com.

I don't have an opinion on the matter, my non-boyfriend does. Ok,
happy now? Isn't that what you really wanted to hear, some juicy
gossip? I don't ask boys out, they ask me out. I am not like the rest
of the girls on IAM.

>
> I don't have an opinion on the matter, my non-boyfriend does. Ok,
> happy now? Isn't that what you really wanted to hear, some juicy
> gossip? I don't ask boys out, they ask me out. I am not like the rest
> of the girls on IAM.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, you came in here with an asssursion. I asked as simple question
and your source is a 'non-boyfriend's' opinion. That's certainly not
first hand. The TOS agreement is.

BTW, I really don't care about the gossip.

"I don't have an opinion on the matter, my non-boyfriend does. Ok,
happy ?now? Isn't that what you really wanted to hear, some juicy
gossip? I don't ask boys out, they ask me out. I am not like the rest
of the girls on IAM.- Hide quoted text -"

You seriously need some deep dick action, and as for "not being like
the rest of the girls on iam" you got that right, they're actually
friendly, and don't post bullshit. get over yourself already.

P. wrote:
>> I don't have an opinion on the matter, my non-boyfriend does. Ok,
>> happy now? Isn't that what you really wanted to hear, some juicy
>> gossip? I don't ask boys out, they ask me out. I am not like the rest
>> of the girls on IAM.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Well, you came in here with an asssursion. I asked as simple question
> and your source is a 'non-boyfriend's' opinion. That's certainly not
> first hand. The TOS agreement is.
>
> BTW, I really don't care about the gossip.
>
Look, I don't care about my non-boyfriend. Any man who is still married
and has a girlfriend, which would not be me, I am not an adulteress, is
not admirable in my book.
I still enjoy IAM. I make new friends there all the time. I'll let my
non-boyfriend go his way. Right now I have to separate from one fringe
group at a time so I will let go of SSBB first.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

> Look, I don't care about my non-boyfriend. Any man who is still married
> and has a girlfriend, which would not be me, I am not an adulteress, is
> not admirable in my book.
> I still enjoy IAM. I make new friends there all the time. I'll let my
> non-boyfriend go his way. Right now I have to separate from one fringe
> group at a time so I will let go of SSBB first.
>

Wow! Golly gee willikers.....hmmmm. I'm actually a bit confused...no
wait...I'm not confuse...you are. I didn't even HINT that you had ANY
relationship with ANYONE. Sorry dearie, that was someone else. I
just asked a simple question and I get a lot of crap about girlfiends
and being married at the same time, non boyfriend's and not being an
audlteress. None of which answered the question I posed...although
now that I think of it...it may be there somewhere.

Ah well, ce la vie. Have fun anyway! Really, I mean it.

P. wrote:
>> Look, I don't care about my non-boyfriend. Any man who is still married
>> and has a girlfriend, which would not be me, I am not an adulteress, is
>> not admirable in my book.
>> I still enjoy IAM. I make new friends there all the time. I'll let my
>> non-boyfriend go his way. Right now I have to separate from one fringe
>> group at a time so I will let go of SSBB first.
>>
>
> Wow! Golly gee willikers.....hmmmm. I'm actually a bit confused...no
> wait...I'm not confuse...you are. I didn't even HINT that you had ANY
> relationship with ANYONE. Sorry dearie, that was someone else. I
> just asked a simple question and I get a lot of crap about girlfiends
> and being married at the same time, non boyfriend's and not being an
> audlteress. None of which answered the question I posed...although
> now that I think of it...it may be there somewhere.
>
> Ah well, ce la vie. Have fun anyway! Really, I mean it.
>
>
No, I am not confused. I am not getting involved with some man who has a
girlfriend and a wife, that's obscene and immoral, and I don't want to
frequent his blogs either. I am really upset. Thank God I have a friend
who told me he had a girlfriend before he told the whole world. I don't
see what's so attractive about him, he's married. What kind of sick girl
would ask a married man out? What is modprom all about anyways? And what
kind of sick girls populate IAM anyways? I feel so strongly about this
issue that I refuse to finish reading The English Patient because its
about adultery. And there is another book I won't get into either, Girl
with a Pearl Earring, again, all about adultery. Sick. Hell my ex had a
girlfriend before our divorce was finalized. Absolutely disgusting. I
have more in common with Rachel than not. I made my husband leave too.
Blather.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Oct 2, 11:06 pm, Miss Pixxie Styx <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
CRAZY> I
CRAZY> have more in common with Rachel than not.


Slander. Libel. Disgusting lies.

I am writing her Prime Minister right now. I might even write the
queen.

You are a disgusting piece of dried up menstrual blood wrapped in
hardened semen.

Kavin