Home  |  Beginners Guide  |  Forums  |  Tattoo Gallery   |  Flash Designs  |  Articles  |  About  |  Contact

Go Back   Tattoo Fans Forums > Body Art Newsgroups > rec.arts.bodyart
  Upload Photo(s)   Search   Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

IAM Back. well, maybe not.

rec.arts.bodyart USENET newgroup for general Body Art discussion. (Disclaimer)


 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-01-2007, 06:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
Patrick
 
Posts: n/a
Default IAM Back. well, maybe not.

IAM was fully back up briefly for about 5 minutes at approximately
3:58am CDT. It's now back to a white page saying they have a problem
and to browse via slow-fi or continue to iam.alive. normal operations
should continue in 20 to 30 minutes.

hopefully, it will. I'm having bad withdrawal pains.

Patrick
http://Patrick.bmezine.com
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 07:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
P.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

On Oct 1, 4:08 am, Patrick <drgns...@teambme.com> wrote:
> IAM was fully back up briefly for about 5 minutes at approximately
> 3:58am CDT. It's now back to a white page saying they have a problem
> and to browse via slow-fi or continue to iam.alive. normal operations
> should continue in 20 to 30 minutes.
>
> hopefully, it will. I'm having bad withdrawal pains.
>


Well, it's semi-working. It's still having problems.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 10:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
i'll teach you to turn away.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

Patrick <drgnswrd@teambme.com> wrote:
P> IAM was fully back up briefly for about 5 minutes at approximately
P> 3:58am CDT. It's now back to a white page saying they have a problem
P> and to browse via slow-fi or continue to iam.alive. normal operations
P> should continue in 20 to 30 minutes.

in case it's deleted as most of the others have been:
http://www.bodytwo.com/blog/2007/10/01/update/

Let me state very clearly that both Rachel Larratt/Zimmerman and Jonathon
Marshall have been fired from their former positions at BME (the
bmezine.com family of sites) and are operating fully without my consent in
their theft of the site and its content, as well as the theft of my
personal sites. In addition they have seized control of my other accounts
(MySpace, etc.) in an attempt to silence me and spread false information.
They are no longer employed my myself, BME, or PsyberCity **in any
capacity** and are possessing the site and locking me and other BME
employees out without my consent.

I demand immediate return of all BME properties and access codes, and
demand that they immediately cease using my copyrighted content and
software.

Shannon Larratt

[-----]

lish "a sensuous kiss
crank@got.net placed on apocalypse." -at
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 07:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Miss Pixxie Styx
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

P. wrote:
> On Oct 1, 4:08 am, Patrick <drgns...@teambme.com> wrote:
>> IAM was fully back up briefly for about 5 minutes at approximately
>> 3:58am CDT. It's now back to a white page saying they have a problem
>> and to browse via slow-fi or continue to iam.alive. normal operations
>> should continue in 20 to 30 minutes.
>>
>> hopefully, it will. I'm having bad withdrawal pains.
>>

>
> Well, it's semi-working. It's still having problems.
>

The personal and private communications on IAM are being monitored, be
aware.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 07:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
KavinTaylor@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

On Oct 1, 7:03 pm, Miss Pixxie Styx <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The personal and private communications on IAM are being monitored, be
> aware.


Just yours.

And they're boring the Hell out of the monitors.

Kavin

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 07:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
P.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.


>
> The personal and private communications on IAM are being monitored, be
> aware.
>
> --


And they weren't before? What's your point?

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 07:00 PM   #7 (permalink)
KavinTaylor@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

On Oct 1, 7:13 pm, "P." <psf...@comcast.net> wrote:
Crazy> > The personal and private communications on IAM are being
monitored, be
CRAZY> > aware.
>
> > --

>

P> And they weren't before? What's your point?

Nuh-uh. Everything on the Internet is private. Even here. On RAB.

Kavin


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 07:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
P.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

On Oct 1, 7:33 pm, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 1, 7:13 pm, "P." <psf...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Crazy> > The personal and private communications on IAM are being
> monitored, be
> CRAZY> > aware.
>
> > > --

>
> P> And they weren't before? What's your point?
>
> Nuh-uh. Everything on the Internet is private. Even here. On RAB.
>
> Kavin


And what's your point?

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 08:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
KavinTaylor@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

On Oct 1, 7:37 pm, "P." <psf...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 7:33 pm, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 1, 7:13 pm, "P." <psf...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > Crazy> > The personal and private communications on IAM are being
> > monitored, be
> > CRAZY> > aware.

>
> > > > --

>
> > P> And they weren't before? What's your point?

>

KT> > Nuh-uh. Everything on the Internet is private. Even here. On
RAB.
>

P> And what's your point?

Exactly that.

Kavin


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 10:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
Miss Pixxie Styx
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

P. wrote:
>> The personal and private communications on IAM are being monitored, be
>> aware.
>>
>> --

>
> And they weren't before? What's your point?
>

No, they were not. My point is obvious. IAM has been compromised.
Dismiss me if you like, its your life.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-01-2007, 11:02 PM   #11 (permalink)
KavinTaylor@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

On Oct 1, 10:50 pm, Miss Pixxie Styx <olympiada2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, they were not. My point is obvious. IAM has been compromised.
> Dismiss me if you like, its your life.


If you would stop posting, you'd have more time to beat your
daughter.

Kavin

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-02-2007, 12:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
P.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

>
> > And they weren't before? What's your point?

>
> No, they were not. My point is obvious. IAM has been compromised.
> Dismiss me if you like, its your life.
>


Gee thanks for letting my know it's my life. I didn't realize how
close you were to the inner workings of BME and IAM for someone that
has been a part of IAM for such a short time?

If I may ask, who gave you this 'startling' info? Rachel? Jon?
Shannon? They would be the only true source for this.

I wouldn't be dropping this type of rumor without backing it up with
facts that are verifiable.

I do wish you well and having fun in BodyTwo.com and IAM.


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-02-2007, 03:00 PM   #13 (permalink)
Curt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

On Oct 1, 10:56 am, cr...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.)
wrote:
> Patrick <drgns...@teambme.com> wrote:
>
> P> IAM was fully back up briefly for about 5 minutes at approximately
> P> 3:58am CDT. It's now back to a white page saying they have a problem
> P> and to browse via slow-fi or continue to iam.alive. normal operations
> P> should continue in 20 to 30 minutes.
>
> in case it's deleted as most of the others have been:http://www.bodytwo.com/blog/2007/10/01/update/
>
> Let me state very clearly that both Rachel Larratt/Zimmerman and Jonathon
> Marshall have been fired from their former positions at BME (the
> bmezine.com family of sites) and are operating fully without my consent in
> their theft of the site and its content, as well as the theft of my
> personal sites. In addition they have seized control of my other accounts
> (MySpace, etc.) in an attempt to silence me and spread false information.
> They are no longer employed my myself, BME, or PsyberCity **in any
> capacity** and are possessing the site and locking me and other BME
> employees out without my consent.
>
> I demand immediate return of all BME properties and access codes, and
> demand that they immediately cease using my copyrighted content and
> software.
>
> Shannon Larratt

[...]

http://www.bodytwo.com/blog/

Best wishes to all concerned, however what's that saying about
somethingsomething is nine-tenths of something? Just seems like being
given the boot at Ford even if you invented the car.

Henry: "Hey, I created the car. I drew up the blueprints. It's got my
name on it! I even have a tattoo of the logo!"
Purported Hijackers: "But you don't have a key to the plant. We've got
the blueprints. You have no employees. We've been making the cars
without you for years. Enjoy your tattoo, pal!"

This is cute:

http://www.ibelieveinadv.com/commons/lawyer.jpg

Signed,
Curt (happily single)

--

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-02-2007, 04:01 PM   #14 (permalink)
Nina Baltes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

P. wrote:

> If I may ask, who gave you this 'startling' info? Rachel? Jon?
> Shannon? They would be the only true source for this.


I predict she's going to claim that Shannon is her boyfriend shortly.
She has a thing for bearded men.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Old 10-02-2007, 06:04 PM   #15 (permalink)
Miss Pixxie Styx
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: IAM Back. well, maybe not.

Nina Baltes wrote:
> P. wrote:
>
>> If I may ask, who gave you this 'startling' info? Rachel? Jon?
>> Shannon? They would be the only true source for this.

>
> I predict she's going to claim that Shannon is her boyfriend shortly.
> She has a thing for bearded men.
>
> Nina

I understand that Shannon has a girlfriend already, he brought her to
mod prom. You can see our public exchange on his blog and ask him about
me if you wish. We have nothing special, we are just internet
acquaintances. He is still married and I am celibate. There is nothing
there.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 PM.


LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Page generated in 0.40595 seconds