Transdermal implants ---diamond studs---

I want this tattoo because I think it would look really hot. I'm
going to get into the Industry soon and diamond studs on my back like
this will hopefully set me apart from the other stars...

Doesn't matter if it's a common enough pattern, all that matters is
that it looks good on me. I like the simplicity, as opposed to a more
complex design, because I want it to show up really well and stand out
a bit better than your typical custom tat. And I say "typical custom"
because some people put waay too much detail into their tats and
frankly I don't think they even look as sexy as this simple, cliche
pattern. *shrugs*

On Oct 30, 12:02 pm, "philthybeat...@gmail.com"
<philthybeat...@gmail.com> wrote:

pb> I want this tattoo because I think it would look really hot. I'm
pb> going to get into the Industry soon and diamond studs on my back
like
pb> this will hopefully set me apart from the other stars...

What industry? Porn?

>
pb> Doesn't matter if it's a common enough pattern, all that matters
is
pb> that it looks good on me.

Setting yourself apart with a common tattoo? Please tell me you
aren't a philosophy major. Then again . . .


pb> I like the simplicity, as opposed to a more
pb> complex design, because I want it to show up really well and stand
out
pb> a bit better than your typical custom tat.

Under this theory, a simple line circle would be even better.

pb> And I say "typical custom"
pb> because some people put waay too much detail into their tats and
pb> frankly I don't think they even look as sexy as this simple,
cliche
pb> pattern. *shrugs*

A bad tattoo is a bad tattoo. Poorly designed and/or executed tattoos
are bad and it doesn't matter whether they are custom or flash. And
the tattoo artist that can't judge his/her skill level is bad.

But given a good artist and the choice between custom or flash, you
have to decide upon your reason for getting the tattoo in the first
place. Good flash does not EVER set you apart from others.

Kavin

philthybeatnik@gmail.com <philthybeatnik@gmail.com> wrote:

> I want this tattoo because I think it would look really hot. I'm
> going to get into the Industry soon and diamond studs on my back like
> this will hopefully set me apart from the other stars...
>
> Doesn't matter if it's a common enough pattern, all that matters is
> that it looks good on me. I like the simplicity, as opposed to a more
> complex design, because I want it to show up really well and stand out
> a bit better than your typical custom tat. And I say "typical custom"
> because some people put waay too much detail into their tats and
> frankly I don't think they even look as sexy as this simple, cliche
> pattern. *shrugs*

shut up.

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:

> At least he's not looking for kanji for his name.

he might as well. he's going to get a shite tattoo anyhow.

On Oct 30, 9:09 pm, dhrr...@ohatzhapu.bet (The Queen of Cans and Jars)
wrote:
> KavinTay...@gmail.com <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote:

kt> > At least he's not looking for kanji for his name.
>
qc> he might as well. he's going to get a shite tattoo anyhow.

Bad design probably done by a scratcher.

Heh.

Kavin

Not really any of your business what the tattoo itself is. My
question was about the diamond studs.

On Nov 4, 10:23 am, "philthybeat...@gmail.com"
<philthybeat...@gmail.com> wrote:
pb> Not really any of your business what the tattoo itself is. My
pb> question was about the diamond studs.

Whatever you post here becomes our business. And YOU posted about the
tattoo.

You're a child. And children shouldn't get tattoos.

Kavin

philthybeatnik@gmail.com <philthybeatnik@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not really any of your business what the tattoo itself is. My
> question was about the diamond studs.

trying to jazz up a weak tattoo with microdermals is a bad idea.

get a good tattoo instead.

On Nov 5, 12:40 am, dhrr...@ohatzhapu.bet (The Queen of Cans and Jars)
wrote:
> philthybeat...@gmail.com <philthybeat...@gmail.com> wrote:

pb> > Not really any of your business what the tattoo itself is. My
pb> > question was about the diamond studs.
>
qc> trying to jazz up a weak tattoo with microdermals is a bad idea.
>
qc> get a good tattoo instead.

Come now. We all know that a good tattoo is the one the wearer
wants.

(God, that hurt to type, even in jest)

Kavin

On Nov 5, 9:43 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Nov 5, 12:40 am, dhrr...@ohatzhapu.bet (The Queen of Cans and Jars)
> wrote:
> > philthybeat...@gmail.com <philthybeat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> pb> > Not really any of your business what the tattoo itself is. My
> pb> > question was about the diamond studs.
>
> qc> trying to jazz up a weak tattoo with microdermals is a bad idea.
>
> qc> get a good tattoo instead.
>
> Come now. We all know that a good tattoo is the one the wearer
> wants.

No, you idiot, as much as we've been over this, well, one would think
you'd have it down by now. I consider the source, of course. Anyway,
here:

Art is subjective. Imo, there are no bad tattoos. There are, however,
tattoos that you like or that you don't like for personal reasons.

Do yourself a favor and write it down, okay?

> (God, that hurt to type,

Hey, some might say it hurts to read what you type.

> even in jest)

No joke.

--
Curt

Kavin I prefer you not post on this anymore. You haven't said one
single constructive thing, and I don't care to hear what you have to
say.

Love it or hate it, this is the tattoo I've chosen. I love it. Sure
there are many like it, just as there are many rose tattoos, or
tattoos of crucifixes. Whatever. I've wanted this design for years.
I haven't come up with anything that I like better. I have looked at
hundreds to get ideas. This is still the one I want. I really don't
give a shit if every single person in the world has this tattoo. It
is not a statement of my individuality. Fuck that. My personality
speaks for itself.

I'm not really satisfied with the microdermals on bmezine. Is that
really all they can do? I don't want it to be like a dot, or an
external button sort of thing. I had imagined it to be like a diamond
partially under my skin, no metal showing, with skin growing around it
to keep it in place.

philthybeatnik@gmail.com <philthybeatnik@gmail.com> wrote:
pgc> Kavin I prefer you not post on this anymore. You haven't said one
pgc> single constructive thing, and I don't care to hear what you have to
pgc> say.

ahahahahahahah

pgc> I'm not really satisfied with the microdermals on bmezine. Is that
pgc> really all they can do? I don't want it to be like a dot, or an
pgc> external button sort of thing. I had imagined it to be like a diamond
pgc> partially under my skin, no metal showing, with skin growing around it
pgc> to keep it in place.

make the post REALLY short. your skin will grow around it just
fine.

lish "& it means half as much
crank@got.net as it used to to me." -mm
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

philthybeatnik@gmail.com <philthybeatnik@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kavin I prefer you not post on this anymore.

fuck off.

> I haven't come up with anything that I like better.

fuck off.

> My personality speaks for itself.

fuck off.

> I'm not really satisfied with the microdermals on bmezine.

fuck off.

ps:

fuck off.

On Nov 5, 6:17 pm, "philthybeat...@gmail.com"
<philthybeat...@gmail.com> wrote:

PB> Kavin I prefer you not post on this anymore.

And I prefer, now, that you were dead. You go first.

pb> You haven't said one
pb> single constructive thing,

Oh, but I have. You are just too childish to listen.

pb>and I don't care to hear what you have to
pb> say.

See, when you aren't open you can't fathom the depth of my wisdom.
Oh, you could allow an art teacher to blow you, but then all you're
going to end up with is cheap paint on your genitals. But hey, it
WOULD match your tattoo.

>I really don't
> give a shit if every single person in the world has this tattoo. It
> is not a statement of my individuality.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA! Jesus Fucking Christ on a Pogo Stick.
That has to be the most ironic statement written in a long, long
time. That is RANA royalty material.

pb> Fuck that. My personality
pb> speaks for itself.

It does. But do YOU know what it's saying?


pb> I had imagined it to be like a diamond
pb> partially under my skin, no metal showing, with skin growing
around it
pb> to keep it in place.

Nina, it's sad that I was more correct.

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com wrote:

> Nina, it's sad that I was more correct.

All these years, and I still assume that people have some common sense...

I'm sure he'll be happy with his tat.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net