Let's play a game --

11-01-2007, 10:09 AM

Who wrote the following and then had enough nerve to caution about
writing things that imply bad deeds. Oh, this wouldn't be the same
person who writes about "context," now, would it?

By the way, the quote concerns our own little Ray Pearson (love ya,
man)

"OTOH, you do have a thing for this comment: "Want some candy little
girl????" And you did just ask me, "You really are a 12 year old
girl, aren't you." (Yeah, no question mark, but that's a Ray-given.
Punctuation = optional) I'm not going to be running from you in
Michigan, am I? Damn. You want to touch me, don't you? :-("

HAW!
Hth.
YMMV.

Kavin

11-01-2007, 05:02 PM

<KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1193928717.325290.297930@19g2000hsx.googlegro ups.com...
> Who wrote the following and then had enough nerve to caution about
> writing things that imply bad deeds. Oh, this wouldn't be the same
> person who writes about "context," now, would it?
>
> By the way, the quote concerns our own little Ray Pearson (love ya,
> man)
>
>

Right back atcha, gives us a little kiss then.

XOXO
Ray

11-01-2007, 10:01 PM

On Nov 1, 10:51 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Who wrote the following

Who may not be as interesting as when, dipsh!t. ;o) Ignorance of the
impending law must be bliss in your neck of the woods. 's coo. If the
Carolinians don't get you then maybe the Supreme Court will. D'OH!

> and then had enough nerve

Nerve? What do you know about nerve, Kavvy? I'm apparently Lord
Voldemort as you seem to be shying away from uttering my name. No
surprise.

> to caution about writing things that imply bad deeds.

Bad deeds? What about bad tattoos? Not going to rattle that cage? So
unlike you.

> Oh, this wouldn't be the same person who writes
> about "context," now, would it?

You tell me, genius.

> By the way, the quote concerns our own little Ray Pearson (love ya,
> man)
>
> "OTOH, you do have a thing for this comment: "Want some candy little
> girl????" And you did just ask me, "You really are a 12 year old
> girl, aren't you." (Yeah, no question mark, but that's a Ray-given.
> Punctuation = optional) I'm not going to be running from you in
> Michigan, am I? Damn. You want to touch me, don't you? :-("
>
> HAW!
> Hth.
> YMMV.
>
> Kavin

Whatever, Kavin. Running proved unnecessary so far as Raymundo was
concerned. He didn't make a peep. Just handed me a free poster and
posed pretty for the camera.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...04/020_27A.jpg

--
Curt

11-01-2007, 10:09 AM	#1 (permalink)
KavinTaylor@gmail.com Posts: n/a	Let's play a game -- Who wrote the following and then had enough nerve to caution about writing things that imply bad deeds. Oh, this wouldn't be the same person who writes about "context," now, would it? By the way, the quote concerns our own little Ray Pearson (love ya, man) "OTOH, you do have a thing for this comment: "Want some candy little girl????" And you did just ask me, "You really are a 12 year old girl, aren't you." (Yeah, no question mark, but that's a Ray-given. Punctuation = optional) I'm not going to be running from you in Michigan, am I? Damn. You want to touch me, don't you? :-(" HAW! Hth. YMMV. Kavin

11-01-2007, 05:02 PM	#2 (permalink)
Ray Pearson Posts: n/a	Re: Let's play a game -- <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1193928717.325290.297930@19g2000hsx.googlegro ups.com... > Who wrote the following and then had enough nerve to caution about > writing things that imply bad deeds. Oh, this wouldn't be the same > person who writes about "context," now, would it? > > By the way, the quote concerns our own little Ray Pearson (love ya, > man) > > Right back atcha, gives us a little kiss then. XOXO Ray

11-01-2007, 10:01 PM	#3 (permalink)
Curt Posts: n/a	Re: Let's play a game -- On Nov 1, 10:51 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote: > Who wrote the following Who may not be as interesting as when, dipsh!t. ;o) Ignorance of the impending law must be bliss in your neck of the woods. 's coo. If the Carolinians don't get you then maybe the Supreme Court will. D'OH! > and then had enough nerve Nerve? What do you know about nerve, Kavvy? I'm apparently Lord Voldemort as you seem to be shying away from uttering my name. No surprise. > to caution about writing things that imply bad deeds. Bad deeds? What about bad tattoos? Not going to rattle that cage? So unlike you. > Oh, this wouldn't be the same person who writes > about "context," now, would it? You tell me, genius. > By the way, the quote concerns our own little Ray Pearson (love ya, > man) > > "OTOH, you do have a thing for this comment: "Want some candy little > girl????" And you did just ask me, "You really are a 12 year old > girl, aren't you." (Yeah, no question mark, but that's a Ray-given. > Punctuation = optional) I'm not going to be running from you in > Michigan, am I? Damn. You want to touch me, don't you? :-(" > > HAW! > Hth. > YMMV. > > Kavin Whatever, Kavin. Running proved unnecessary so far as Raymundo was concerned. He didn't make a peep. Just handed me a free poster and posed pretty for the camera. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...04/020_27A.jpg -- Curt

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search