Looking for picture

<trained@yahoo.com> wrote:

> (look it up in the dictionary)

blah blah blah.

smart but lazy doesn't cut it.

On Nov 20, 10:23 pm, trai...@yahoo.com wrote:

tr> Actually, I have a masters in communication, and have taught
college
tr> english.

Really. Then you understand that "english" is really "English"?


tr> I was born in American

That Masters is helping you how?

tr >and have been speaking english for 52
tr> years. On a pretty much daily basis I'm creating technical
reports
tr> and documents to be presented to the FDA and other US and foriegn
tr> government agencies.

So you understand the missing comma in that sentence? And can you
possibly explain how you are incapable of using a spell-check
program? I guess "foriegn" agencies don't care.


tr>After screwing with technically accurate writing
tr> 8-10 hours a day, I seldom bother to worry about it when I'm
kicked
tr> back at home.

Yeah, keep telling yourself that.

>
tr> As far as the term "tat", while it may be common knowledge to you
that
tr> it's a derogatory term, it isn't to every one.

And what is your point?

tr> In fact, those that
tr> have a strong english background

That would be "English". Do you mean those who are of English
extraction, or are you somehow talking of those who understand the
language? Yeah, the degree, right?

tr>would probably associate the work
tr> with making lace (look it up in the dictionary), which as far as I
tr> know is not a pass time

That would be "past-time" for those communication majors paying
attention. And just to point out the obvious, you have proven why
"tat" should never be used to refer to a tattoo. But then again, you
have the Masters. You understood that.


tr> enjoyed by "crack-whores" and "toothless
tr> rednecks" (though I am curious as how the qualitry of dental work
tr> plays into it?). As far as how I used it, I was being lazy and
tr> looking for a way to type less.

Lazy communication was taught at your University? I'll bet you aced
that course.

tr> The same as when I type "LOL" in
tr> place of "Laughing out Loud".

The fact that you don't understand the difference makes me very, very
sad. Please, where did you get that Masters?

What I pointed out, as did others, was tat does not mean the same as
tattoo.
>
tr> I do thank you for the explanation of how YOU use the language
though,
tr> and I will try to communicate where you can understand me in the
tr> future.

I doubt it. I understand the language mush better than you. By the
way, what University granted you the Masters in Communication? And
please, just where did you teach College-level English?

Kavin

On Nov 20, 11:59 pm, dhrr...@ohatzhapu.bet (The Queen of Cans and
Jars) wrote:
> <trai...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > (look it up in the dictionary)
>
Q> blah blah blah.
>
Q> smart but lazy doesn't cut it.

You're implying smart. I think you overstep a bit.

Anything but.

Kavin

On Nov 21, 1:15 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
[...]

> I understand the language mush better than you.

In that case, perhaps you could explain the use of the word mush in
the preceding sentence. Thanks, pal!

[...]

--
Curt

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 20, 11:59 pm, dhrr...@ohatzhapu.bet (The Queen of Cans and
> Jars) wrote:
> > <trai...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > (look it up in the dictionary)
> >
> Q> blah blah blah.
> >
> Q> smart but lazy doesn't cut it.
>
> You're implying smart. I think you overstep a bit.
>
> Anything but.

educated, then. he's the one claiming it, in either case.