holy hell

haha wtf. cripes.

http://www.freedom2ink.com

lish "broken hearts
crank@got.net want broken necks." -mm
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

On Jan 18, 5:38 pm, cr...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.)
wrote:
ity> haha wtf. cripes.
>
ity> http://www.freedom2ink.com

What is this, lipstick tattoos? Easy to try on and easy to remove.

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 18, 5:38 pm, cr...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.)
> wrote:
> ity> haha wtf. cripes.
> ity> http://www.freedom2ink.com
>
> What is this, lipstick tattoos? Easy to try on and easy to remove.

No, it's that encapsulated ink that dissolves easily when hit with a
laser. More accurately, the laser destroys the PMMA capsule, and the ink
is released and removed by the immune system after a single session.
Apparently, it doesn't form the big particles that normal ink does, so
it doesn't stay in the skin.

Unlike the allergen-free cat, this is genuine. At least it's been
scientifically published several times now ;).

They're probably going to make tons of money with crappy tattoos that
the wearer will want to remove:
http://www.freedom2ink.com/images/_6_H7R2733.jpg
That's on the CEO. Nice imitation of a skin removal.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

Nina Baltes <chaotropic@gmx.de> wrote:
NB> No, it's that encapsulated ink that dissolves easily when hit with a
NB> laser. More accurately, the laser destroys the PMMA capsule, and the ink
NB> is released and removed by the immune system after a single session.
NB> Apparently, it doesn't form the big particles that normal ink does, so
NB> it doesn't stay in the skin.

so isn't that going to have the usual problems & blur-outs from
the macrophages that we'd expect with those other weird "temporary" ideas
that've come up?

NB> They're probably going to make tons of money with crappy tattoos that
NB> the wearer will want to remove:
NB> http://www.freedom2ink.com/images/_6_H7R2733.jpg
NB> That's on the CEO. Nice imitation of a skin removal.

ergh.

lish "well, i may be a lot of things
crank@got.net but i won't be ignored." -mm
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:

> so isn't that going to have the usual problems & blur-outs from
> the macrophages that we'd expect with those other weird "temporary" ideas
> that've come up?

Who knows. They only seem to have that one color at the moment.
The website says the wanted to be on the market last year. Maybe what's
keeping them is that actual colors don't work as advertized.

Nina
--
C'est les microbes qui auront le dernier mot.
Louis Pasteur
http://www.chaotropic.net

On Jan 19, 3:43 am, Nina Baltes <chaotro...@gmx.de> wrote:
> KavinTay...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Jan 18, 5:38 pm, cr...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.)
> > wrote:
> > ity> haha wtf. cripes.
> > ity> http://www.freedom2ink.com
>
kt> > What is this, lipstick tattoos? Easy to try on and easy to
remove.
>
nb> No, it's that encapsulated ink that dissolves easily when hit with
a
nb> laser.

I was going more for the "lipstick lesbian" type comparison. I
understand the science behind it. Just was alluding to people who
probably aren't "tattoo people" to begin with. It gives them a chance
to do something that is ill-conceived with no consequence.

Kavin