![]() |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|||||||
| rec.arts.bodyart USENET newgroup for general Body Art discussion. (Disclaimer) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Corine <smiling-frog@home.nlkillspam> wrote:
> The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote: > > > Nice killfile ya got there, sparky. > > > *Kill files are for pussies :) > Hi sweetie, long time no see! Hi yourself! You have been missed muchly. |
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Corine wrote:
[...] > *Quality being one thing, Keith's Koi imitation still > disturbs me... > > Corine Why? And I was unaware it was an imitation. Is that a fact or was something lost in the translation? -- Curt http://curtjames.com/ |
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Curt James <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> Corine wrote: > [...] > >> *Quality being one thing, Keith's Koi imitation still >> disturbs me... >> >> Corine > > Why? > > And I was unaware it was an imitation. Is that a fact or was something > lost in the translation? > Eh, we all knew what it was. You trying desparately to be popular once again---and failing once again. -----yttrx -- http://www.yttrx.net |
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
yttrx schreef: > Eh, we all knew what it was. You trying desparately to be popular > once again---and failing once again. *Note the fact that he know doesn't deny it was a Koi which he always defended with teeth and nails while Keith was alive. Low...Yuck! Corine |
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
smiling-frog@home.nl wrote:
> > yttrx schreef: > > >> Eh, we all knew what it was. You trying desparately to be popular >> once again---and failing once again. > > *Note the fact that he know doesn't deny it was a Koi which he always > defended with teeth and nails while Keith was alive. Low...Yuck! > Yup. At the time it was just lame---everyone knew it was a copy in some kind of twisted, poetic effort to be one of the cool kids (which he could have easily been had he just stopped being so creepy and terrible)---and I mean everyone knew it was a copy. Now its gone from lame to utterly pathetic. -----yttrx -- http://www.yttrx.net |
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Corine wrote:
[...] > *Note the fact Facts, unfortunately, seem rather fluid with you, Corine. > that he know doesn't deny it was a Koi What koi? He had a koi on his back which I called a big cartoon fish in jest. We went round and round about realism versus illustrative yadayada. Likewise I complimented him on the work, selecting the artist, what have you. What are you on about, Corine, with the "doesn't deny" statement? > which he always defended with teeth and nails while Teeth and nails? Defended? I don't even know what or who you're talking about. Are you typically confused? > <snip> was alive. Low...Yuck! What low? Your comprehension of events? > Corine -- Curt http://curtjames.com/ |
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Curt James <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What low? Your comprehension of events? > Maybe we should change the subject, Curt. -----yttrx -- http://www.yttrx.net |