holy crap

http://www.physorg.com/news122819670.html

lish "& it means half as much
crank@got.net as it used to to me." -mm
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

i'll teach you to turn away. <crank@got.net> wrote:
l> http://www.physorg.com/news122819670.html

i have smart friends. :D

To: 'delicately free of mind' <crank@got.net>
Subject: RE: holy crap

I'm not sure I really believe it either. I think it is a "concept" that
some journalism school dropout thinks is real.

The implant would have to be between the skin and the fascia. This is
really pretty deep. To be seen the microspheres would have to be in the
collagen matrix closer to the surface. The currents to flip the spheres
through the layers of dermis would have to be strong to overcome the
inherent conductivity of the skin.

I remember when I was a kid there was an article in Popular Science about
human batteries. The idea was that you could power electronic devices
using the electrolytes in the body. There was actually a picture of a
person with wires implanted in his hand powering an electric fan. All
this would work and could be done quite easily (that geeks pierced
themselves in the '60s should also not be that surprising). One little
problem and that is for the battery to work, the electrode ions have to move
between the electrodes. That means coper, zinc whatever is not only exposed
to your precious bodily fluids but is being electronically combined with
them.

So, whereas I have no doubt that the human battery existed, I don't think it
existed for very long.

If there is any truth here, it's on that level.

---

lish "everybody has a question
crank@got.net if not an adoring letter." -jc
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

On Mar 7, 1:41 pm, cr...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.) wrote:
> i'll teach you to turn away. <cr...@got.net> wrote:
> l> http://www.physorg.com/news122819670.html
>
> i have smart friends. :D

Where did they put the mic?

Kavin