Re: JMW says I'M obsessed with HIM?

Curt James wrote:
> JMWhat-if-it's-not-true-simply-because-you-say-it's-true? wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Sure, Curt sucks up to newbies. He's always done
> > that because,
>
> Typically, you have defined "sucks up to newbies" as any action on my
> part that involves my being nice or replying positively to someone YOU
> dislike.

No, Curt. You suck up big time to every single newbie that comes into
MFW, slathering them all with hugs 'n' kisses, and Googling furiously
to provide them with answers on subjects about which you know nothing.
In other words, you do *exactly* what Eric S. accused you of doing more
than three years ago in RAB:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...10afe93?hl=en&

There's a pattern here, Curt. Maybe it's time you recognized it.

In rec.arts.bodyart JMW <jmwilliams_56@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
>> JMWhat-if-it's-not-true-simply-because-you-say-it's-true? wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > Sure, Curt sucks up to newbies. He's always done
>> > that because,
>>
>> Typically, you have defined "sucks up to newbies" as any action on my
>> part that involves my being nice or replying positively to someone YOU
>> dislike.
>
> No, Curt. You suck up big time to every single newbie that comes into
> MFW, slathering them all with hugs 'n' kisses, and Googling furiously
> to provide them with answers on subjects about which you know nothing.
> In other words, you do *exactly* what Eric S. accused you of doing more
> than three years ago in RAB:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...10afe93?hl=en&
>
> There's a pattern here, Curt. Maybe it's time you recognized it.
>

That IS exactly what he's been doing here on RAB. I'm not surprised
he's been doing it elsewhere, nor that he's been called out on it.

Just please tell me he hasn't met any of your women in real life yet.




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yttrx.net

yttrx wrote:
> In rec.arts.bodyart JMW <jmwilliams_56@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Curt James wrote:
> >> JMWhat-if-it's-not-true-simply-because-you-say-it's-true? wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> > Sure, Curt sucks up to newbies. He's always done
> >> > that because,
> >>
> >> Typically, you have defined "sucks up to newbies" as any action on my
> >> part that involves my being nice or replying positively to someone YOU
> >> dislike.
> >
> > No, Curt. You suck up big time to every single newbie that comes into
> > MFW, slathering them all with hugs 'n' kisses, and Googling furiously
> > to provide them with answers on subjects about which you know nothing.
> > In other words, you do *exactly* what Eric S. accused you of doing more
> > than three years ago in RAB:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...10afe93?hl=en&
> >
> > There's a pattern here, Curt. Maybe it's time you recognized it.
> >
>
> That IS exactly what he's been doing here on RAB. I'm not surprised
> he's been doing it elsewhere, nor that he's been called out on it.
>
> Just please tell me he hasn't met any of your women in real life yet.

Is he a stalker, too?

In rec.arts.bodyart JMW <jmwilliams_56@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> yttrx wrote:
>> In rec.arts.bodyart JMW <jmwilliams_56@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Curt James wrote:
>> >> JMWhat-if-it's-not-true-simply-because-you-say-it's-true? wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> > Sure, Curt sucks up to newbies. He's always done
>> >> > that because,
>> >>
>> >> Typically, you have defined "sucks up to newbies" as any action on my
>> >> part that involves my being nice or replying positively to someone YOU
>> >> dislike.
>> >
>> > No, Curt. You suck up big time to every single newbie that comes into
>> > MFW, slathering them all with hugs 'n' kisses, and Googling furiously
>> > to provide them with answers on subjects about which you know nothing.
>> > In other words, you do *exactly* what Eric S. accused you of doing more
>> > than three years ago in RAB:
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...10afe93?hl=en&
>> >
>> > There's a pattern here, Curt. Maybe it's time you recognized it.
>> >
>>
>> That IS exactly what he's been doing here on RAB. I'm not surprised
>> he's been doing it elsewhere, nor that he's been called out on it.
>>
>> Just please tell me he hasn't met any of your women in real life yet.
>
> Is he a stalker, too?
>

I don't know about stalking, honestly. But I've got over a dozen little
anecdotes in my inbox about him making women IRL very uncomfortable; whether
it's from creepy verbal come-ons to actual alleged feel-copping. When they
reject him (which they always do) they suddenly become bitches and whores,
worthy of nothing but the worst public attacks in his arsenal---as you've
seen on your group in spades. We've seen it here too.

He's more than a simple asshole, I think. Sometimes I find myself worrying
that he might actually be dangerous.




-----yttrx

[...]

> <snip> actual alleged <snip>

Actual alleged?

:o) Do you read what you write?

> Sometimes I find myself worrying that he might
> actually be dangerous.

Grrrrrr!

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
>> <snip> actual alleged <snip>
>
> Actual alleged?
>
> :o) Do you read what you write?
>

I'm actually more careful than you can possibly imagine about
what I write.





-----yttrx

yttrx wrote:
> Curt James <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> <snip> actual alleged <snip>
> >
> > Actual alleged?

I mean, it's like saying something's a genuine fake, isn't it?

> > :o) Do you read what you write?
> >
>
> I'm actually more careful

Define careful. No, don't. Instead, could you explain actual alleged?
Is that... oh, wait. You also said fat always equals slow. How could I
forget? D'OH! I rescind the question.

> than you can possibly imagine about what I write.

Describe the process.

I like to read posts that interest me a few times. Then I'll write my
reply. Maybe. Okay, more often than not. Anyway, I'll reread it at
least once looking for typos, thinking about rewording, reviewing for
repetitive this or redundant that. If I'm posting from Google groups,
I'll typically do a Select All/Copy before clicking on Post message.
(Don'tcha just HATE when stuff gets eaten?) I type fast (but not 130
wpm) and read fairly fast, too, so it really doesn't take that much
time. But, yeah, I write a LOT, so...

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/