Rubbing alcohol?

Curt James wrote:

> Um, mica, if you ask just about anyone on the planet what a tat is,
> I'll bet they'll be able to struggle through to a fairly reasonable
> description of a tattoo

Or, they may think it has something to do with lace.

Why do you need (and yes, I chose 'need' for a reason) everything to be
so nebulous?

A tat artist? Do you think that shows repect for a persons ability?

Pathetic. You are so pathetic.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
>
> > <snip> ask just about anyone on the planet what a tat is,
> > I'll bet they'll be able to struggle through to a fairly reasonable
> > description of a tattoo
>
> Or, they may think it has something to do with lace.

Give me a break. You're saying that, "Hey, man, nice tat!" overheard
would be interpreted by a bystander as, "Oh, they must be talking about
lace." Is that what you're saying? No.

> Why do you need (and yes, I chose 'need' for a reason)
> everything to be so nebulous?

Whatever, Kav.

> A tat artist? Do you think that shows repect for a persons
> ability?

A person's ability is judged by the quality of their work, Kavin, and
not, imo, on a single word.

> Pathetic. You are so pathetic.

Well, pathetic I may just be, but if you think that anyone would
suspect lace as the subject if they overheard the words nice and tat in
combination then I'd say you're not far behind me, Kavin. ;o)

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
>> Curt James wrote:
>>
>> > <snip> ask just about anyone on the planet what a tat is,
>> > I'll bet they'll be able to struggle through to a fairly reasonable
>> > description of a tattoo
>>
>> Or, they may think it has something to do with lace.
>
> Give me a break. You're saying that, "Hey, man, nice tat!" overheard
> would be interpreted by a bystander as, "Oh, they must be talking about
> lace." Is that what you're saying? No.
>
>> Why do you need (and yes, I chose 'need' for a reason)
>> everything to be so nebulous?
>
> Whatever, Kav.
>
>> A tat artist? Do you think that shows repect for a persons
>> ability?
>
> A person's ability is judged by the quality of their work, Kavin, and
> not, imo, on a single word.
>
>> Pathetic. You are so pathetic.
>
> Well, pathetic I may just be, but if you think that anyone would
> suspect lace as the subject if they overheard the words nice and tat in
> combination then I'd say you're not far behind me, Kavin. ;o)
>
>> Kavin
>

Note, Kavin, that Curt has adopted my idiom, Kavin, of seasoning a
response with the name of the target, Kavin.

Except, Kavin, I did it to unnerve, Kavin. I suspect Curt is doing it,
Kavin, because he still thinks on some level he can be like me.




-----yttrx




--
http://www.yttrx.net

[gtfa]

Decoy said:
> I've heard that rubbing alcohol is used in the inks and on all the
> instruments.
> Is this true? Is there a way to get tattooed without ever touching
> rubbing alcohol or any alcohol substance (haha no not the drinking
> type)?

No, it is not 100% true that alcohol is used. Speak to your artist, I seem to recall that many black inks specifically do not use alcohol.

Also-

WOULD IT HAVE KILLED YOU TO MENTION THAT YOU ARE ALLERGIC TO ALCOHOL, AND NOT JUST RETARDED???

Sheesh.

And just what are you a decoy for?

An old joke:
So the cops are sitting in the parking lot of a bar at closing time, watching everyone stumble out. There is one guy that is just off his rocker falling over drunk. They decide to tag him. They watch as he continues to stumble, and as everyone else finds their cars and leaves. Finally, this guy gets to his car, the parking lot is empty by now. He gets in and starts it up, the cops immediately grab him. After running him through the battery of tests, they find that he is stone cold ... sober. WTF, they ask him what the deal is. His reply:

"I'm the designated decoy tonight."

Greetings and salutations, enjoy your stay on RAB and READ THE FUCKING FAQ!

Thanks,

and stuff.

Decoy wrote:
> I've heard that rubbing alcohol is used in the inks and on all the
> instruments.
> Is this true? Is there a way to get tattooed without ever touching
> rubbing alcohol or any alcohol substance (haha no not the drinking
> type)?
>
> Thanks
water based ink mate australia loves it

Curt James wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > Curt James wrote:
> >
cj> > > <snip> ask just about anyone on the planet what a tat is,
cj> > > I'll bet they'll be able to struggle through to a fairly
reasonable
cj> > > description of a tattoo
> >
kt> > Or, they may think it has something to do with lace.
>
cj> Give me a break. You're saying that, "Hey, man, nice tat!"
overheard
cj> would be interpreted by a bystander as, "Oh, they must be talking
about
cj> lace." Is that what you're saying? No.

Care to go to your favorite little on-line encyclopedia and look up
tat? I dare you.


kt> > A tat artist? Do you think that shows repect for a persons
kt> > ability?
>
> A person's ability is judged by the quality of their work, Kavin, and
> not, imo, on a single word.

Re-read. Once again you turn your response to a different statement.
Typical.


Kavin

gtfa wrote:
> WOULD IT HAVE KILLED YOU TO MENTION THAT YOU ARE ALLERGIC TO ALCOHOL,
> AND NOT JUST RETARDED???
> Sheesh.

Not just retarded? I never even thought of anyone thinking that because
right up until someone said straight edge did I even remember that
those people are around and are like that with alcohol.
Who are the retarded ones for not asking me to clarify before freaking
out?
All I did was ask a question.
I got some useful answers, thank you to those who replied in a decent
manner.
The rest of you should really get another hobby other than jumping all
over people who post simple questions in newsgroups.

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Care to go to your favorite little on-line
> encyclopedia and look up tat?

Oh, dear. Ya know, I don't *have* a favorite little on-line
encyclopedia, but I've often visited urbandictionary.com. Would that
do?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tat

I suppose not, huh? Yeah.

> I dare you.

What year is it? Because my calendar says 2006. Grade school children
don't even say that any longer, Kavin. Are you wearing a leisure suit?
A diaper?

[...]

> Re-read.

No. It's boring enough reading your stuff a single time.

> Once again you turn your response to a different statement.

Hey, that new tattoo forum looks pretty nice. See:
http://www.mytattooink.com/forum/

ahahahHA!

....

Ahem.

See, I turned my response to a different statement and... oh, never
mind. But seriously, your inability to make yourself understood should
not be interpreted as my whatever.

> Typical.

Did you say something?

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

ThatDecoy <smokydecoy@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> gtfa wrote:
>> WOULD IT HAVE KILLED YOU TO MENTION THAT YOU ARE ALLERGIC TO ALCOHOL,
>> AND NOT JUST RETARDED???
>> Sheesh.
>
> Not just retarded? I never even thought of anyone thinking that because
> right up until someone said straight edge did I even remember that
> those people are around and are like that with alcohol.
> Who are the retarded ones for not asking me to clarify before freaking
> out?
> All I did was ask a question.
> I got some useful answers, thank you to those who replied in a decent
> manner.
> The rest of you should really get another hobby other than jumping all
> over people who post simple questions in newsgroups.
>

Why are you still here?




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yttrx.net

Curt James <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Care to go to your favorite little on-line
>> encyclopedia and look up tat?
>
> Oh, dear. Ya know, I don't *have* a favorite little on-line
> encyclopedia, but I've often visited urbandictionary.com. Would that
> do?
>
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tat

Curt likes poo!




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yttrx.net

Curt James wrote:

<snipped all>

So you can't prove your point once again. In fact, you proved my
point.

See the problem, yet, with that little gray world of yours? Probably
not. You like it that way.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
>
> <snipped all>

HA! That's probably your best option, Kav. ;o)

> So you can't prove your point once again. In fact, you proved my
> point.

Well, seeing as how you snipped "all" it's kindasorta, yeah, difficult
to discuss any particular points, Kav. However, iirc, there was
something in there about the use of the word tat. LOTS of people use
tat when they speak of their tattoos. Urban Dictionary includes tat as
well. You asked for an encyclopedia reference, again iirc. No wonder
you'd snip http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tat

> See the problem, yet, with that little gray world of yours?

My world is large and filled with all manner of beautiful colors. You
have no idea, obviously.

> Probably not. You like it that way.

Hnh. I guess you DID say something. Sadly, it didn't make sense. No
surprise, of course.

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
>
> <snipped all>

HA! That's probably your best option, Kav. ;o)

> So you can't prove your point once again. In fact, you proved my
> point.

Well, seeing as how you snipped "all" it's kindasorta, yeah, difficult
to discuss any particular points, Kav. However, iirc, there was
something in there about the use of the word tat. LOTS of people use
tat when they speak of their tattoos. Urban Dictionary includes tat as
well. You asked for an encyclopedia reference, again iirc. No wonder
you'd snip http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tat

> See the problem, yet, with that little gray world of yours?

My world is large and filled with all manner of beautiful colors. You
have no idea, obviously.

> Probably not. You like it that way.

Hnh. I guess you DID say something. Sadly, it didn't make sense. No
surprise, of course.

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James wrote: Duplicate post

You really shouldn't be on your computer drunk.

Your post said nothing the first time.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:

> Curt James wrote: Duplicate post
>
> You really shouldn't be on your computer drunk.

HA! Your investigative skills are sorely lacking. Of course, I already
knew that.

> Your post said nothing the first time.

Hence the repetition. After a few minutes, I suspected you'd need the
help of that repetition. Apparently you're too dense to reap any
benefit.

> Kavin

--
Curt