Lower Back Tattoo Article

There is nothing sexier than a lower back tattoo on a beautiful woman.
When done right, a good one is like the wearer's way of putting a
nice little exclamation point on her unspoiled body. It's the
perfect accessory and there is nothing else quite like it. As you can
tell, I am a big fan.

Ladies, if you are thinking about getting a tattoo, allow me to lobby
for the lower back. I took the plunge last year and couldn't be
happier. It's the queen of all tattoos and I promise it will produce
more firepower than anything else out there. There are many great
things which set it apart.

http://www.kicksnlicks.com/082106tattoo.html

stevensnell1978@yahoo.com wrote:
syc> There is nothing sexier than a lower back tattoo on a beautiful woman.
syc> When done right, a good one is like the wearer's way of putting a
syc> nice little exclamation point on her unspoiled body. It's the
syc> perfect accessory and there is nothing else quite like it.

ass antlers.

lish "your house is standing
crank@got.net on a foot & a half of silt." -uc
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

"i'll teach you to turn away." <crank@got.net> wrote in message
news:4mjotoF6ie36U1@individual.net...
> stevensnell1978@yahoo.com wrote:
> syc> There is nothing sexier than a lower back tattoo on a beautiful
> woman.
> syc> When done right, a good one is like the wearer's way of putting a
> syc> nice little exclamation point on her unspoiled body. It's the
> syc> perfect accessory and there is nothing else quite like it.
>
> ass antlers.
>
> lish "your house is standing
> crank@got.net on a foot & a half of silt." -uc
> 43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

target practice

joy

Joy Joyner-Wright wrote:
> "i'll teach you to turn away." <crank@got.net> wrote
> > stevensnell1978@yahoo.com wrote:
> > syc> There is nothing sexier than a lower back tattoo
> > syc> on a beautiful woman. When done right, a good
> > syc> one is like the wearer's way of putting a nice little
> > syc> exclamation point on her unspoiled body. It's the
> > syc> perfect accessory and there is nothing else quite
> > syc> like it.
> >
> > ass antlers.
>
> target practice

And "target practice" is mentioned, however subtly, in the article.

Regardless, the author has it all wrong, unfortunately. No amount of
ink will make a woman more appealing if she's not appealing to another
person already, imo. I mean, if you find Marilyn Monroe stunning, would
putting this outfit - http://tinyurl.com/s6xkh - on this body -
http://tinyurl.com/mg62p - make any difference in your level of
attraction? Likewise a lower back tattoo.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> stevensnell1978@yahoo.com wrote:
> syc> There is nothing sexier than a lower back tattoo on a beautiful woman.
> syc> When done right, a good one is like the wearer's way of putting a
> syc> nice little exclamation point on her unspoiled body. It's the
> syc> perfect accessory and there is nothing else quite like it.
>
> ass antlers.
>
> lish "your house is standing
> crank@got.net on a foot & a half of silt." -uc
> 43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70
>
An ideal description for blackwork, but I feel if it's a name or
somesuch that 'slag tag' is also appropriate.

Dougman <douglas.farnan@dundeecity.gov.uk> wrote:

> An ideal description for blackwork, but I feel if it's a name or
> somesuch that 'slag tag' is also appropriate.

Because only sluts, whores, and slags get tattoos?

The Queen of Can't See and The Obvious wrote:
> Dougman wrote:

re ass antlers as a term

> > An ideal description for blackwork, but I feel if it's a
> > name or somesuch that 'slag tag' is also appropriate.
>
> Because only sluts, whores, and slags get tattoos?

More likely because the two words... rhyme.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

The Queen of Cans and Jars <dhrravr@ohatzhapu.bet> wrote:
TQoCaJ> Dougman <douglas.farnan@dundeecity.gov.uk> wrote:
>> An ideal description for blackwork, but I feel if it's a name or
>> somesuch that 'slag tag' is also appropriate.
TQoCaJ> Because only sluts, whores, and slags get tattoos?

no, because only sluts, whores, & slags get NAME tattoos.

lish "take my tongue -
crank@got.net it's cocked & loaded." -es
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> Dougman <douglas.farnan@dundeecity.gov.uk> wrote:
>
> > An ideal description for blackwork, but I feel if it's a name or
> > somesuch that 'slag tag' is also appropriate.
>
> Because only sluts, whores, and slags get tattoos?

Not at all, if that were the case then I'm a slut/whore/slag. Most of
the lower back tattoos I see are badly done and attached to a benefit
scrounging chav pushing a triple pram.

However, I have seen some very good tattoos on lower backs, usually not
attached to the kind of person I have mentioned above.

Dougman <douglas.farnan@dundeecity.gov.uk> wrote:
>
> The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
>> Dougman <douglas.farnan@dundeecity.gov.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > An ideal description for blackwork, but I feel if it's a name or
>> > somesuch that 'slag tag' is also appropriate.
>>
>> Because only sluts, whores, and slags get tattoos?
>
> Not at all, if that were the case then I'm a slut/whore/slag. Most of
> the lower back tattoos I see are badly done and attached to a benefit
> scrounging chav pushing a triple pram.
>
> However, I have seen some very good tattoos on lower backs, usually not
> attached to the kind of person I have mentioned above.
>

Around these parts, they're "tramp stamps". Even if they're very, very
good.

I guess.

I've never seen a very, very good tramp stamp.




-----yttrx




--
http://www.yttrx.net

i'll teach you to turn away. <crank@got.net> wrote:
> The Queen of Cans and Jars <dhrravr@ohatzhapu.bet> wrote:
> TQoCaJ> Dougman <douglas.farnan@dundeecity.gov.uk> wrote:
>>> An ideal description for blackwork, but I feel if it's a name or
>>> somesuch that 'slag tag' is also appropriate.
> TQoCaJ> Because only sluts, whores, and slags get tattoos?
>
> no, because only sluts, whores, & slags get NAME tattoos.

Hey, remember that chick that got "princess" done by p. cornolo? She
was only kinda cute, but that particular bejeweled girlie spot idiocy
made me kind of want to throw it in her.




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yttrx.net

i'll teach you to turn away. <crank@got.net> wrote:

> no, because only sluts, whores, & slags get NAME tattoos.

D'oh. Of course!

Dougman <douglas.farnan@dundeecity.gov.uk> wrote:

> The Queen of Cans and Jars wrote:
> > Dougman <douglas.farnan@dundeecity.gov.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > An ideal description for blackwork, but I feel if it's a name or
> > > somesuch that 'slag tag' is also appropriate.
> >
> > Because only sluts, whores, and slags get tattoos?
>
> Not at all, if that were the case then I'm a slut/whore/slag. Most of
> the lower back tattoos I see are badly done and attached to a benefit
> scrounging chav pushing a triple pram.

Oh, so it's having a *bad* tattoo that makes a woman a slag?

yttrx <yttrx@yttrx.net> wrote:
y> i'll teach you to turn away. <crank@got.net> wrote:
>> no, because only sluts, whores, & slags get NAME tattoos.
y> Hey, remember that chick that got "princess" done by p. cornolo? She
y> was only kinda cute, but that particular bejeweled girlie spot idiocy
y> made me kind of want to throw it in her.

yeah, i know. & i'm totally deadpan unsurprised.

lish "no one is too young
crank@got.net to die." -jc
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

The Queen of Cans and Jars <dhrravr@ohatzhapu.bet> wrote:
TQ> Oh, so it's having a *bad* tattoo that makes a woman a slag?

or a man!

mica, yo la tengo will be here in october. where will YOU be?

lish "what part of 'shithead'
crank@got.net makes you raise your hand?" -rgp
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70