gauged lobe piercing

Curt James wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:

CJ> I suspect you'd only complainwhinecry regardless of the offering.
Why?
CJ> Because that's you. Good luck with that.

So nothing current? No. Nothing current.


> > kt> > And have you seen his schools website? Not one piece of his
> > students
> > kt> > art.
> > >
> > cj> Talk to legal.
> >
kt> > Really?
>
cj> Really.
>
cj> All the art teachers were told that posting student art was
something
cj> that needed to be worked out with legal. Spin whatever fantasy
makes
cj> you happy, but that's the fact.

So what you are saying is you don't find your students to be worth your
time. (No, that wasn't a question) Other teachers did work it out
with legal.

http://www.hbgsd.k12.pa.us/204350122...BCOB=0&C=46099


> > The sewing teachers seem capable of getting STYLE on the
> > website.
>
> Link? Because I'm not sure you even have the right school. You missed
> the mark on your specialty question. I wouldn't be surprised if you
> have the wrong state.

See above. Try again


>
kt> > Who'd you piss off?
>
cj> I wonder.
>
kt> > (Then again, that was a stupid question)
>
cj> Typically, I believe there are no stupid questions, however since
you
cj> asked it, hey, I'm not going to argue with the characterization.

You won't argue that you pissed someone off? Good move.

>
kt> > Or is there a restraining order against you?
>
cj> How's that work exactly? You have experience with those things,
Kav? I
cj> do not.

Not even with those two 'crazy' fiances?


kt> > No, I'm sure it's because they don't want a full page with
thumbnails
kt> > of the litttle man at the card table holding up various student
art.
>
cj> Whatever, Kav. The tiny card table is a fictional creation that
brought
cj> not a few laughs to several people. You're grasping at straws.

No. Curt. Just pointing out that even if you did show the students'
art, you would somehow make it about you. Get the point now?


cj> I currently volunteer with
cj> Black Achievers and the school's Teaching, Enhancing, Nurturing
(TEN)
cj> program.

And outside of 'work'? It's easy to volunteer on the boss's dime.

> Half of my childhood was spent on a farm. The other half in that
> t-r-a-i-l-E-r park you allude to. However even so-called trailer trash
> can spell better than you, pal. And most of us can dodge a volleyball,
> too.

Wow, that Navy supplied education certainly allowed you to pick up a
play on words.

TRAILOR. Trailer + sailor.

Hit a nerve, huh? When did you get running water? Indoor plumbing?

And the volleyball story. Even Dr. Slick must be shaking his head now.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
>
> CJ> I suspect you'd only complainwhinecry regardless of the
> CJ> offering. Why? Because that's you. Good luck with that.
>
> So nothing current?

Yes, I have current artwork available. Just not available to you at the
moment for the reason I've already given: You'd only complainwhinecry
regardless of the offering.

Did you get that this time?

Because, hey, I can offer it a third time, Kavin. ;o)

> No. Nothing current.
>
> > > kt> > And have you seen his schools website? Not one piece of his
> > > students art.
> > > >
> > > cj> Talk to legal.
> > >
> kt> > Really?
> >
> cj> Really.
> >
> cj> All the art teachers were told that posting student art was
> something that needed to be worked out with legal. Spin whatever
> fantasy makes you happy, but that's the fact.
>
> So what you are saying is you don't find your students to be worth your
> time.

My students are worth a great deal and so don't get it twisted.

> (No, that wasn't a question)

Obviously.

> Other teachers did work it out with legal.

You're incorrect on at least two counts in that statement.

> http://www.hbgsd.k12.pa.us/204350122...BCOB=0&C=46099

Once again, the terrier drops the ball. Your argument - if that's what
this is - doesn't hold water until you find an art educator who has
posted images of student art and has also included names with those
images on a district web page.

> > > The sewing teachers seem capable of getting STYLE on the
> > > website.

At least you're amusing, so do go on, Kav.

"The sewing teachers seem capable of getting STYLE on the website."

There's one page with a student name visible and, unless they obtained
a parental permission form, that shouldn't be there, actually. I'm sure
they did obtain permission, of course.

But you're not really interested in anything but your attempt at
somehow calling me on something. Apparently, anything. Have fun with
that because this is as much of a bite as you're getting.

> > Link? Because I'm not sure you even have the right school. You missed
> > the mark on your specialty question. I wouldn't be surprised if you
> > have the wrong state.
>
> See above.

I did. You got the right state, but you missed on everything else, imo.


There's art there, but it's not art posted by an art teacher. Great
stuff, though. They're truly beautiful crafts and works of art.
Although I had seen some of that art in person, I hadn't seen the web
page, so thanks for posting the link.

> Try again

Try what again? To get you to understand that the art teachers in the
Harrisburg School District do not post student artwork at this time?
You don't want a primer on legal issues, you want to be able to say
whatever it is you want to say. Sooo, have you had your say or are you
going to continue to make a fool of yourself?

> kt> > Who'd you piss off?
> >
> cj> I wonder.
> >
> kt> > (Then again, that was a stupid question)
> >
> cj> Typically, I believe there are no stupid questions, however since you
> cj> asked it, hey, I'm not going to argue with the characterization.
>
> You won't argue that you pissed someone off? Good move.

This isn't an argument. It's post and reply.

> kt> > Or is there a restraining order against you?
> >
> cj> How's that work exactly? You have experience with those things,
> cj> Kav? I do not.
>
> Not even with those two

There were three, actually.

> 'crazy'

None as crazy as you, I suspect.

> fiances?

And is fiances a word?

Fiancé is the groom, Kavin. Have YOU ever been engaged? Rhetorical.

But, no, not one of the women I called my fiancée needed a restraining
order against me. One attempted a recent reconciliation, in fact. A
surprise indeed as she's the one who dumped me more than 20 years ago.
The other invited me out to dinner with her one daughter within the
last three years. The third has no contact with me, but she's the one
you may be familiar with via RAB posts. I'm relieved there's been no
contact with her, but, yeah, at the time I thought she was the one and
only. People make mistakes all the time. I'm certain you can appreciate
making mistakes.

> kt> > No, I'm sure it's because they don't want a full page with thumbnails
> kt> > of the litttle man at the card table holding up various student art.
> >
> cj> Whatever, Kav. The tiny card table is a fictional creation that brought
> cj> not a few laughs to several people. You're grasping at straws.
>
> No. Curt. Just pointing out that even if you did show the students'
> art,

Which, hey, if this IS actually an attempt at being argumentative with
me, that last only verifies my thought that regardless of what I
posted, you'd only whine and moan in response. "Just point out that
even if you did," blah blah blah. It doesn't matter, obviously. You've
got your ax. Enjoy grinding it.

> you would somehow make it about you.

And what's that mean? Can you be more specific? I mean how is your post
not about you and your seemingly intense need to point out my so-called
errors? You're not saying that your posts/exchanges with me don't
relate to your self esteem or some need on your part to prove yourself
superior or... what? What drives you?

Again, rhetorical.

> Get the point now?

You haven't made a point to get.

Get that?

> cj> I currently volunteer with Black Achievers and the
> cj> school's Teaching, Enhancing, Nurturing (TEN)
> cj> program.
>
> And outside of 'work'?

That IS outside of work, Kavin.

You really shouldn't ask questions until you think them through. I
stated clearly that I currently *volunteer* with Black Achievers and
the TEN program. Volunteer would, oh, to some people of a certain
intelligence, indicate that I was speaking of a nonpaid position.

> It's easy to volunteer on the boss's dime.

But, Kavin, that's not volunteering at all.

I attend Black Achievers on the third Saturday of every month as an
unpaid mentor. A true volunteer as I receive no financial remuneration
from the YMCA for my BA participation nor do I get a dime for helping
out with the TEN students' activities. There is a paid instructor in
the classroom with the students during that after school program. The
program meets in the art room. I am typically in the room after my
normal working hours and regularly volunteer during the time the
program meets.

No pay. Not required to be there. And not on "the boss's dime." Of
course, as an educator, I suppose there's the viewpoint that I'm
salaried and am therefore actually getting paid 24/7, but that's not
what my paycheck reflects. I'm a 189-day employee and get paid by the
hour. A handsome hourly rate at that, imo, despite what people say
about teachers not being paid enough.

> > Half of my childhood was spent on a farm. The other half in that
> > t-r-a-i-l-E-r park you allude to. However even so-called trailer trash
> > can spell better than you, pal. And most of us can dodge a volleyball,
> > too.
>
> Wow, that Navy supplied education certainly allowed you to pick up a
> play on words.
>
> TRAILOR. Trailer + sailor.

Please. That has to be the very worst attempt at an explanation for a
common misspelling that's ever been offered. Sell it to the Air Force,
Kavvy.

> Hit a nerve, huh?

Not at all. I owned a $5000 trailer and might buy another. Manufactured
homes rock. Unless, I'm guessing, you live in Florida.

> When did you get running water?

Never. I shower at the gym.

> Indoor plumbing?

Ha! Speaking of plumbing...

> And the volleyball story.

Yeah, the volleyball story!

http://www.weplay.com/athletic/cup/

Might want to use that if you choose to click the following link, Kav.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9aeb6514a4cf14

heh :o)

> Even Dr. Slick must be shaking his head now.

Doubtful.

He may just be shaking his head, however, at the thought of you
soliciting any kind of support from his direction. Ho ho!

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James wrote:

>regardless of what I
> posted, you'd only whine and moan in response.


My, isn't that the pot calling the kettle black.

I was going to give a list of names for which that is true for you, but
you know it includes anyone that matters that will still post to RAB.

And yes, I can tell you who matters.


Kavin