![]() |
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|||||||
| rec.arts.bodyart USENET newgroup for general Body Art discussion. (Disclaimer) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everyone,
I work for an independent publishing company called Mark Batty Publisher (www.markbattypublisher.com) and we're working on a book on Arabic tattoos and western culture. We are trying to collect photographs from people with Arabic body art for possible use in the book. So if you're interested, please send pictures of your tattoos to jon@markbattypublisher.com and we'll see if we could use you in our book. If we do use your contribution, you'll get a free copy of the book when it comes out in Spring 2007 and you'll get credit in the book itself. Thanks. Take Care, Jon |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Kavin Taylor wrote:
re jau204 at g mail dot com's comment about independent publishing company, Mark Batty Publisher (www.markbattypublisher.com), and their in-progress book on Arabic tattoos and western culture and its attempt to collect photographs from people with Arabic body art for possible use in that proposed book > Hey Jon -- > > [expletive deleted] off. > Kavin Some might possibly consider that spam, but I'll guess that more would consider your posts as trolling (and I'm loathe to use that term as, hey, I've been called the same by your bestestest buddy and mine elsewhere, Kavvy). > Curt will be along shortly to <snip> Is this the flights of fantasy thread? Because I thought it was about Arabic tattoos. To the OP: Best of luck with your project. -- Curt http://curtjames.com/ |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> jau204@gmail.com wrote: Kgc> Hey Jon -- Kgc> Fuck off. what was the problem with that post? it was on-topic, polite, didn't ask you to buy anything, & offered compensation. being in books is fun. justify your actions to me, kav. lish "you never crank@got.net make it easy." -sc 43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70 |
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >what was the problem with that post? Because it is no different than a person coming to RAB and asking us to design their tattoo. At least give an indication that you have done more than just Googled 'tattoo.' The payment is not relevant. Neither is the fun. I'm sure it would be fun to get someone to put a crappy tattoo on their body so you can laugh at them. (There's a thought . . . ) And besides, why not Kanji? Kavin |
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Kavin Taylor wrote:
> i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > > >what was the problem with that post? > > Because it is no different than a person coming to > RAB and asking us to design their tattoo. Apples and oranges much? The OP has a project and is looking for participants. I recently mentioned the book Body Type by Ina Saltz which relates to tattooed type on human flesh. http://www.amazon.com/Body-Type-Inti.../dp/0810970503 How did Saltz find her participants? Perhaps you helped with that like you helped on that legislation in Dekalb county? What would have been wrong with Saltz posting a request for interested parties to be included in her book? That book, btw, included many images from author Shelley Jackson's _Skin_ which, yeah, was mentioned in this newsgroup by one of your aforementioned "us." http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...5f1592bf5977d0 Is that it? That the thing? It's an outsider showing the effrontery of actually posting to the great and mighty RAB? > At least give an indication that you have done more than just > Googled 'tattoo.' What? Who says they haven't done more than just Googled? It's not a far stretch to imagine that they've done more than simply posted to RAB a single time. > The payment is not relevant. Neither is the fun. I'm > sure it would be fun to get someone to put a crappy > tattoo on their body so you can laugh at them. (There's > a thought . . . ) > > And besides, why not Kanji? Why not? Post for participants. But you won't. Regardless, a) Imo, your reply to lish doesn't make a lick of sense. b) You offered a knee-jerk response to the OP that you obviously didn't think through. Typical of you. c) I'm tempted to say the only reason you replied at all was as an excuse to include your last sentence: "Curt will be along shortly to suck your dick" And re c), yes, I realize lish indicated no issue with that. > Kavin -- Curt http://curtjames.com/ |
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
jau204@gmail.com wrote: <snip> By the way, did you try uk bodyart? For many more reasons . . . But then, you have done your research. Kavin |
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Kavin Taylor wrote:
re jau204 > By the way, did you try uk bodyart? Um, Kavin, yeah, I do believe he effed right the eff off as per your earlier suggestion. Forget about that? Hmm. How'd it go? Wait here. I'll just ask Captain Google. Ah, yes. "[expletive deleted] off." - Kavin > For many more reasons . . . > > But then, you have done your research. Whatever. If you'd've thought first, you might have asked the OP that question instead of what you did, well, offer. And, remember, it reflects on you. Hth. > Kavin -- Curt http://curtjames.com/ |
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Curt James wrote: > Kavin Taylor wrote: > > re jau204 > > > By the way, did you try uk bodyart? > > Um, Kavin, yeah, I do believe he effed right the eff off as per your > earlier suggestion. Then why aren't you dead, yet? I made that suggestion several times. Kavin |
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote: > > Kavin Taylor wrote: > > > > re jau204 > > > > > By the way, did you try uk bodyart? > > > > Um, Kavin, yeah, I do believe he effed right the eff off as per your > > earlier suggestion. > > Then why aren't you dead, yet? > > I made that suggestion several times. Perhaps I'm not as prone to suggestion as the OP. ;o) Nevertheless, it still reflects on you. > Kavin -- Curt http://curtjames.com/ |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: >>what was the problem with that post? Kgc> Because it is no different than a person coming to RAB and asking us to Kgc> design their tattoo. At least give an indication that you have done Kgc> more than just Googled 'tattoo.' sure it was. "compensation", for starters. Kgc> The payment is not relevant. Neither is the fun. I'm sure it would be Kgc> fun to get someone to put a crappy tattoo on their body so you can Kgc> laugh at them. (There's a thought . . . ) fun is always relevant. there's precious little left on rab. Kgc> And besides, why not Kanji? write your own book. put your kanji rocker on the cover! lish "well i, i might be wrong, crank@got.net but you, you tag along." -mm 43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70 |
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Just so everyone knows: I have been doing a ton of research on this
topic and I did not just google "tattoo," but since it's a relatively new trend it has been difficult to find info and gather contacts. We are a small company (not a huge corporation) who actually does care about visual culture and communication, and we're trying to bring this subcultural idea out into the open. I am also interested in anything that anyone has to say on the topic, whether you're for it or against it, so perhaps people can start posting statements to that effect? In the meantime, I appreciate the support ' i'll teach you...,' and if anyone still wants to share their bodywork for the purpose of this book or has an expertise in this field and wished to comment, email me at jon@markbattypublisher.com. Take care. i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote: > Kgc> i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > >>what was the problem with that post? > Kgc> Because it is no different than a person coming to RAB and asking us to > Kgc> design their tattoo. At least give an indication that you have done > Kgc> more than just Googled 'tattoo.' > > sure it was. "compensation", for starters. > > Kgc> The payment is not relevant. Neither is the fun. I'm sure it would be > Kgc> fun to get someone to put a crappy tattoo on their body so you can > Kgc> laugh at them. (There's a thought . . . ) > > fun is always relevant. there's precious little left on rab. > > Kgc> And besides, why not Kanji? > > write your own book. put your kanji rocker on the cover! > > lish "well i, i might be wrong, > crank@got.net but you, you tag along." -mm > 43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70 |
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Just so everyone knows: I have been doing a ton of research on this
topic and I did not just google "tattoo," but since Arabic tattoos is a relatively new trend (that's why we are doing the book on that instead of kanji, and plus we already did a book on some aspect of Japanese design and are not ready to go back to it just yet) it has been difficult to find info and gather contacts. We are a small company (not a huge corporation) who actually does care about visual culture and communication, and we're trying to bring this subcultural idea out into the open. I am also interested in anything that anyone has to say on the topic, whether you're for it or against it, so perhaps people can start posting statements to that effect? In the meantime, I appreciate the support ' i'll teach you...,' and if anyone still wants to share their bodywork for the purpose of this book or has an expertise in this field and wished to comment, email me at jon@markbattypublisher.com. Take care. i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote: > Kgc> i'll teach you to turn away. wrote: > >>what was the problem with that post? > Kgc> Because it is no different than a person coming to RAB and asking us to > Kgc> design their tattoo. At least give an indication that you have done > Kgc> more than just Googled 'tattoo.' > > sure it was. "compensation", for starters. > > Kgc> The payment is not relevant. Neither is the fun. I'm sure it would be > Kgc> fun to get someone to put a crappy tattoo on their body so you can > Kgc> laugh at them. (There's a thought . . . ) > > fun is always relevant. there's precious little left on rab. > > Kgc> And besides, why not Kanji? > > write your own book. put your kanji rocker on the cover! > > lish "well i, i might be wrong, > crank@got.net but you, you tag along." -mm > 43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70 |
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
jau204@gmail.com wrote: J2> Just so everyone knows: I have been doing a ton of research on this J2> topic and I did not just google "tattoo," And again: did you try uk bodyart? J2>but since it's a relatively > J2new trend So why do a book on it? >it has been difficult to find info and gather contacts. Again, one post to RAB is not impressive research. >We > are a small company (not a huge corporation) who actually does care > about visual culture and communication, and we're trying to bring this > subcultural idea out into the open. Uh, that is always the point about sub-culture. It really doesn't stand up to the light of day. You are trying to mainstream it. Sorry. Doesn't work. And it is a company that cares. You're scaring me. > I am also interested in anything > that anyone has to say on the topic, whether you're for it or against > it, so perhaps people can start posting statements to that effect? Tell you what, give me details about you, then maybe I'll give you details about me. But Arabic tattoos? No. And you do need to define what YOU mean by Arabic tattoo. And by the way, why aren't you using a company e-mail address? Makes me think you aren't on the payroll, know what I mean? Kavin |
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
jau204@gmail.com <jau204@gmail.com> wrote:
jgc> In the meantime, I appreciate the support ' i'll teach you...,' and if yeah. i'm supporting the way you asked, not the idea. yet another $35 coffeetable book of awful tattoos is, as far as i'm concerned, a stupid idea. lish "& help's not short when you're digging crank@got.net your grave. i'll help you dig it." -mm 43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70 |