I finally did it and now I'm disapointed.

Ok, so I was thinking of getting my nose pierced and ONLY wanted it if
I could have a little tiny cz clear stud... I went to a place and did
it but they said they only did one size blah blah blah--turns out I
hate the stud they put in because it's just TOO BIG. They said I
should wait for at least 2 months before changing it and the reason
they don't put in a tiny one at first is the skin could potentially
heal over it. Has anyone ever heard of these restrictions? Has anyone
ever changed their stud imediatley (with in a 3 days of getting it
done) Is the skin going to heal over it if I do change it to something
smaller? And anything else you can give me!

Thanks,

I finally did it and now I'm disapointed.

jenacopeland@gmail.com wrote:
> <blah, blah, blah>

Oh look, my boyfriend said he'd only stick his dick two inches into me
and he went his whole 4 inches. Should I be mad?

Jesus Christ, child.


If you wanted it pierced at 18 gauge and the piercer would only do it
10 gauge, perhaps you should have questioned a bit more. It is your
body.

You can take the jewelry out, put in a smaller piece and you will not
die.

Just don't reproduce. Please.


Kavin

jenacopeland@gmail.com wrote:
> <blah, blah, blah>

Oh look, my boyfriend said he'd only stick his dick two inches into me
and he went his whole 4 inches. Should I be mad?

Jesus Christ, child.


If you wanted it pierced at 18 gauge and the piercer would only do it
10 gauge, perhaps you should have questioned a bit more. It is your
body.

You can take the jewelry out, put in a smaller piece and you will not
die.

Just don't reproduce. Please.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Just don't reproduce. Please.

Just don't double post. Please.

Hth.

> Kavin

--
Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> jenacopeland@gmail.com wrote:
> > <blah, blah, blah>

I didn't see blah, blah, blah. I saw:

"Ok, so I was thinking of getting my nose pierced and ONLY wanted it if
I could have a little tiny cz clear stud... I went to a place and did
it but they said they only did one size blah blah blah--turns out I
hate the stud they put in because it's just TOO BIG. They said I
should wait for at least 2 months before changing it and the reason
they don't put in a tiny one at first is the skin could potentially
heal over it. Has anyone ever heard of these restrictions? Has anyone
ever changed their stud imediatley (with in a 3 days of getting it
done) Is the skin going to heal over it if I do change it to something
smaller? And anything else you can give me!

Thanks,

I finally did it and now I'm disapointed."

> Oh look,

-=snip=-

> If you wanted it pierced at 18 gauge and the piercer would only do it
> 10 gauge, perhaps you should have questioned a bit more.

Still, a piercer has, imo, a responsibility to not only make money, but
to also satisfy the customer. Obviously, the OP is not satisfied. The
OP explained what she wanted, the piercer - I imagine - knew what they
were offering would not fit that explanation, but chose to pierce the
OP anyway.

> It is your body.

True, however the OP was eager and anxious to have the new piercing and
- some would certainly say - the piercer took advantage of that fact.

> You can take the jewelry out, put in a smaller
> piece and you will not die.

And I suspect the "Is the skin going to heal over it if I do change it
to something
smaller?" varies from person to person.

> Just don't reproduce. Please.

What was the problem with that post? It was on-topic, polite, and
didn't ask you to buy anything. There is no justification for your
actions, Kavvy.

Hmm. That sounds oddly familiar.

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:

cj> -=snip=-

What's the matter, the 4 inch reference make you feel small?

<snipped>

So in Curt's world, you have no control over your actions. In Curt's
world:

1-- You piercer drops the needle before piercing you. He picks it up
and wipes it off and proceeds. You let him, because he's the piercer!
Besides, you can cry later when the Hep. test comes back positive.

2-- Todd Bertrang finally gets out of prison and convinces you to cut
out your clit with a melon baller. You finally agree to let him do it
because, well, he's Todd. And he smells of lavender. Besides, that 00
gauge clit ring just isn't doing it for you. You can always get a new
clit on e-bay.

3-- You finally consent to go on a date with Curt James because he
won't quit whining. He takes you to Pizza Hut for the all you can eat
salad bar. He starts trying to go up your shirt to feel your tits as
soon as the order is placed. You think you'll let him because maybe
then he'll back off. Then you start thinking " Hmmmmmm, after that,
he'll probably try to give me a hickey. Then, he's going to try to go
up my skirt and play with my pussy. He'll probably take out his penis
in the car and want a blow job. Then I'll have to . . ." punch him!
(Sorry, in Curt's world the skank would have fucked him. I couldn't go
there).


> What was the problem with that post? It was on-topic, polite, and
> didn't ask you to buy anything. There is no justification for your
> actions, Kavvy.
>
> Hmm. That sounds oddly familiar.

So that's how you got through that 7-week Navy journalism course.
Plagiarism.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
>
> cj> -=snip=-
>
> What's the matter, the 4 inch reference make you feel small?

Not at all, Kavin.

[...]

> So in Curt's world, you have no control over your actions.

Did I say that? No.

What I said was, "the OP was eager and anxious to have the new piercing
and - some would certainly say - the piercer took advantage of that
fact."

Regardless, a piercer has, imo, a responsibility to not only make
money, but to also satisfy the customer. Obviously, the OP is not
satisfied. The OP explained what she wanted, the piercer - I imagine -
knew what they were offering would not fit that explanation, but chose
to pierce the OP anyway.

> In Curt's world: <snip>

You're muuuuch better looking. ;o)

Unfortunately, we live in the real world and, hey, too bad, so sad,
Kavvy.

> > What was the problem with that post? It was on-topic, polite, and
> > didn't ask you to buy anything. There is no justification for your
> > actions, Kavvy.
> >
> > Hmm. That sounds oddly familiar.
>
> So that's how you got through that 7-week Navy journalism course.
> Plagiarism.

Hardly. It would have been plagiarism if I hadn't offered the "Hmm.
That sounds oddly familiar." As it was recently directed to you by
lish, it's obvious that I was quoting her words by way of a jab at the
fact - from my perspective - your response to her query was sadly
lacking.

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James wrote:
It would have been plagiarism if I hadn't offered the "Hmm.

Really? So you think 'hmmmmm' is the same thing as 'lish previously
posted'?

You were taught that in the journalism course?

Kavin

I'd say that the piercer probably didn't have the proper training to be
perfoming such piercings.....changing it out early...well...it could
lead to scar tissue forming, possible infection, or a possible reaction
to whatever cheap ass jewelry you mihgt find at hot topic, it might
also create more swelling in the affected area

Barring all of those possiblites, you won't die of switching out the
jewelry....i'd recomend you find the BEST piercing shop in your
area...and ask them for help.


KavinTaylor@gmail.com wrote:
> Curt James wrote:
> It would have been plagiarism if I hadn't offered the "Hmm.
>
> Really? So you think 'hmmmmm' is the same thing as 'lish previously
> posted'?
>
> You were taught that in the journalism course?
>
> Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote:

> > It would have been plagiarism if I hadn't offered
> > the "Hmm.
>
> Really? So you think 'hmmmmm' is the same thing
> as 'lish previously posted'?

No, 'hmmmmm' is the same thing as 'Kavin has no sense of context or
humor.'

> You were taught that in the journalism course?

We were all encouraged to write at the reading comprehension level of a
5th grader, however it looks like I'll have to dumb things down just a
leeeeetle bit more for you, eh?

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James wrote:
> We were all encouraged to write at the reading comprehension level of a
> 5th grader,

You failed. Second grade at best.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote:

> > We were all encouraged to write at the reading
> > comprehension level of a 5th grader,
>
> You failed. Second grade at best.

Kavin, I'm sorry. I didn't know.

http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforre...ch_adults.html


Hth.

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 03:58:09 -0800, Shit For Brains wrote:

> True, however the OP was eager and anxious to have the new piercing and
> - some would certainly say - the piercer took advantage of that fact.

What makes you automatically assume the piercer was at fault?
Could it not have equally as easily been a situation where the piercer
gave the correct advice but the persistent customer nagged until the
piercer went ahead and did the piercing? If the client is going to be an
ass and you know they'll just go get it done elsewhere, why not take grab
the cash and get rid of the headache?

Think, Curt. Just because people who post here may not be treated with the
greatest of respect doesn't mean they're the ones who are 'right' in
situations elsewhere. Once they stick around and prove themselves worth of
respect, something you will never achieve, they will be treated with it.

-Greg

--
razorbuzz
-=Doubt is not the opposite of faith; it is one element of it.=-

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Razor Buzz wrote:
> Shit For Brains wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

heh

Now, Greg, why would I be, oh, let's say, *less than inclined* to
listen to what else you might have to say? ;o)

But, hey, I'm a sport, so...

> > True, however the OP was eager and anxious to have the new piercing and
> > - some would certainly say - the piercer took advantage of that fact.
>
> What makes you automatically assume the piercer was at fault?

Nothing. And, fwiw, I didn't.

Note: "and - some would certainly say -"

That would indicate somethingsomething NOT ALL, however, right?

> Could it not have equally as easily been a situation where the piercer
> gave the correct advice but the persistent customer nagged until the
> piercer went ahead and did the piercing?

Agreed, of course. Otoh...

> If the client is going to be an ass and you know they'll just go get
> it done elsewhere, why not take grab the cash and get rid of the
> headache?

So, you agree, there is, however, that possibility. Again, some would
certainly say (yourself included obviously, right?) the piercer took
advantage of that fact. Or, at the very least, MAY have taken advantage
of that fact.

> Think, Curt.

I did. And, hey, I typically do.

Hth.

> Just because people who post here may not be treated with the
> greatest of respect doesn't mean they're the ones who are 'right' in
> situations elsewhere.

Agreed on that as well.

> Once they stick around and prove themselves worth of respect,
> something you will never achieve, they will be treated with it.

Common sense is beyond the grasp of many. Good luck with that.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/