LOW BUDGET ADVERTISING

Promote your business by renting Pixels at PIXELS HOMEPAGE
<http://www.pixelblogs.blogspot.com>on month to month basis. A 3000 pixel
(100x30) ad costs only $30 for a month.

pundit005 wrote:

> Promote your business by renting Pixels at
> PIXELS HOMEPAGE <snip> on month to month
> basis. A 3000 pixel (100x30) ad costs only $30
> for a month.

I pay something like thirty bucks for an entire year for five pages of
Web schtufff.

For $99 a year, iirc, www.readyhosting.com is prepared to provide hella
more.

(checks readyhosting)

And for $419.40 a year? Yeebus! See:

http://www.readyhosting.com/readyhosting/commerce.bml

What do you get for $360 per year? Never mind. I smell "a bogus
organization promoted by the companies about which" somethingsomething.


--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James wrote:
> What do you get for $360 per year? Never mind. I smell "a bogus
> organization promoted by the companies about which" somethingsomething.

But that's okay. There is no 'bad'. Charge what you want.

Come on Curt. "Bogus?" Please explain. No, prove it.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt James wrote:

> > What do you get for $360 per year? Never mind. I smell
> > "a bogus organization promoted by the companies about
> > which" somethingsomething.
>
> But that's okay. There is no 'bad'. Charge what you want.
>
> Come on Curt. "Bogus?" Please explain.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e63e7decb402ae


Please try to keep up.

> No, prove it.

What, that your underoos are in a bunch? I'll pass. Still, it seems
fairly obvious.

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James wrote:
<snipped>

Curt, not everyone reads every post. We have lives. You, very
obviously, don't. Anything yttrx or lish writes, well of course we
read it. Otherwise, you really are silly to believe that something is
read just because it is posted. Granted, you would reply to anything
that is posted, but that is where it ends.

The word would be 'attribution.' I'm sure that seven week Journalism
course taught you that.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Curt, not everyone reads every post. We have lives.

ahahahHA! Tell me of your life. No, don't.

You seem to enjoy commenting on my every post yet now you're apparently
too quick to say "not everyone reads every post." Regardless, I was
replying to pundit's post. And pundit would have recognized his or her
own words. As far as that goes, if you were paying attention, you may
have noticed the quotation marks attached to those words even if you
aren't one of those who, yes, "reads every post."

Hth.

And, once again, you depend on the assumed security of the we. "We have
lives." Yes, I'm certain you do, however you choose to make my posts a
part of your life.

> You, very obviously, don't.

As always, your perspective is skewed.

> Anything yttrx or lish writes, well of course we read it.

Cool.

> Otherwise, you really are silly to believe that
> something is read just because it is posted.

Again, making sense of my reply to pundit didn't require having read
every post. Of course it seems obvious that your concern was less in
making sense of my reply to pundit and more in making a comment
directed at me.

> Granted, you would reply to anything
> that is posted, but that is where it ends.

I do love to reply. And, yes, I do love to post. You may have noticed.
;o)

> The word would be 'attribution.' I'm sure that seven
> week Journalism course taught you that.

I'm familiar with attribution and I'm also familiar with being wary of
errors of fact. You might want to get up to speed on that as well.

> Kavin

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> Anything yttrx or lish writes, well of course we read it.

hey, those are the two i read, too!

lish "& it takes half as much
crank@got.net as it used to for me." -mm
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kgc> Anything yttrx or lish writes, well of course we read it.
>
ity> hey, those are the two i read, too!

I left out nina for the science perspective. My bad.

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
>> KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Kgc> Anything yttrx or lish writes, well of course we read it.
ity>> hey, those are the two i read, too!
Kgc> I left out nina for the science perspective. My bad.

i left out nina because she's superior to ALL of this.

lish "well i, i might be wrong,
crank@got.net but you, you tag along." -mm
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70