Question's for Curt James

Curt I have read your childish banter and use less comments for about a
year now, so I feel I have a fair knowledge of your personality, now Curt I
realise the preceding was a statment, and not a question, as is this, so
there should not be any need for Your feeble little brain to go into
overload pointing this out. Curt why do You persist in such infantile
behaviour? In case Your confused Curt, that one was a question followed by a
statment. Do You in fact have anything to offer this group ? If You look
closely Curt the questions are followed by "?". Is Your level of social
interaction so poor that this is Your only form of attention? Also Curt I
noticed You tend to make comments as to people's sexuality, there are some
very well known facts about men who critisize homosexuals, so given that.
Are You in fact a closet Homosexual ? Im not trying to imply anything here
Curt. But rather, allowing You the opportunity to clear this up. Also do You
actually have any tattoing experience ? Because whenever someone ask's a
serious question, You provide them with garbage comments.
Thank You For Your Time

Gozzo <agaslannospam@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> Curt I have read your childish banter and use less comments for about a
> year now, so I feel I have a fair knowledge of your personality, now Curt I
> realise the preceding was a statment, and not a question, as is this, so
> there should not be any need for Your feeble little brain to go into
> overload pointing this out. Curt why do You persist in such infantile
> behaviour? In case Your confused Curt, that one was a question followed by a
> statment. Do You in fact have anything to offer this group ? If You look
> closely Curt the questions are followed by "?". Is Your level of social
> interaction so poor that this is Your only form of attention? Also Curt I
> noticed You tend to make comments as to people's sexuality, there are some
> very well known facts about men who critisize homosexuals, so given that.
> Are You in fact a closet Homosexual ? Im not trying to imply anything here
> Curt. But rather, allowing You the opportunity to clear this up. Also do You
> actually have any tattoing experience ? Because whenever someone ask's a
> serious question, You provide them with garbage comments.
> Thank You For Your Time
>
>

I know I'm not curt, but I can answer a couple of those...

1. Curt promised years ago when he was first discovered on this newsgroup
to be a complete idiot and publically roasted repeatedly for it that he would
"destroy RAB". It turns out that his tactic is deceptively simple; he simply
drove away everyone interesting by constantly, for many years, every single
day, being a complete fuckhead. So to answer why he does the whole infantile
banter thing, its because he's been getting revenge all this time.

2. Sexually, curt is pretty clear. He hits on girls that he has no chance
with in the creepiest of creepy ways (some would say bordering on stalking),
and then when rejected he becomes instantly very abusive towards them, almost
always publically. He's probably actually heterosexual, but also celibate
due to his extreme creepiness which appears to make everyone very uncomfortable.




-----yttrx




--
http://www.yttrx.net

yttrx wrote:

> 1. Curt promised years ago when he was first discovered on this newsgroup
> to be a complete idiot and publically roasted repeatedly for it that he would
> "destroy RAB". It turns out that his tactic is deceptively simple; he simply
> drove away everyone interesting by constantly, for many years, every single
> day, being a complete fuckhead.

If you want to see something really weird, check out Curt's postings on
the Harley Group. He's basically ignored AND he will not point out
their spelling or grammar problems. So unlike his behavior here, the
muscle fitness group, UK bodyart, etc.

I wonder what the Harley folks know that we don't -- or should?

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yttrx wrote:
>
>> 1. Curt promised years ago when he was first discovered on this newsgroup
>> to be a complete idiot and publically roasted repeatedly for it that he would
>> "destroy RAB". It turns out that his tactic is deceptively simple; he simply
>> drove away everyone interesting by constantly, for many years, every single
>> day, being a complete fuckhead.
>
> If you want to see something really weird, check out Curt's postings on
> the Harley Group. He's basically ignored AND he will not point out
> their spelling or grammar problems. So unlike his behavior here, the
> muscle fitness group, UK bodyart, etc.
>
> I wonder what the Harley folks know that we don't -- or should?
>

I think hes actually afraid of bikers.




-----yttrx




--
http://www.yttrx.net

Hmmm, It would appear Curt has suddenly lost his ability to type. Curt I
have gone to the trouble of asking You a question, could You please be
decent enough to reply ?


"yttrx" <yttrx@yttrx.net> wrote in message
news:Yifhh.3653$Yy1.3276@textfe.usenetserver.com.. .
> KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> yttrx wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Curt promised years ago when he was first discovered on this
>>> newsgroup
>>> to be a complete idiot and publically roasted repeatedly for it that he
>>> would
>>> "destroy RAB". It turns out that his tactic is deceptively simple; he
>>> simply
>>> drove away everyone interesting by constantly, for many years, every
>>> single
>>> day, being a complete fuckhead.
>>
>> If you want to see something really weird, check out Curt's postings on
>> the Harley Group. He's basically ignored AND he will not point out
>> their spelling or grammar problems. So unlike his behavior here, the
>> muscle fitness group, UK bodyart, etc.
>>
>> I wonder what the Harley folks know that we don't -- or should?
>>
>
> I think hes actually afraid of bikers.
>
>
>
>
> -----yttrx
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.yttrx.net
>

Gozzo wrote:

> Hmmm, It would appear Curt has suddenly
> lost his ability to type.

Not yet.

Eventually, of course, but, no, not yet!

> Curt I have gone to the trouble

Trouble, eh? You're, perhaps, losing your ability to type? Hence the
trouble? No matter. And, no, not a serious question either.

> of asking You a question,

Excellent. I enjoy questions. Often much more than some RABbits enjoy
my answers, however.

> could You please be decent enough to reply ?

Certainly. Let's review those questions, shall we?

[...]

But, first, in case you missed my recent post, here's an apparently
applicable recap:

I prefaced the Subject title as OT because the article is entirely,
yes, apart from the word tattoo, off topic bodyart. However, Doyel's
comment re Iverson as, "someone whose immense physical gifts were never
enough to make him or those around him happy," is certainly apropos
RAB, imo. There are, apparently, many people who have tattoos and yet
remain disgruntled and seemingly panties-inna-bunch impaired. Pity.

And you, unfortunately, do seem disgruntled for some reason.

To wit:

You asked, "Curt why do You persist in such infantile behaviour?"

Infantile behaviour would go to opinion, yes, in MY opinion. Much
pot-kettle-black-edness swirls here. Again, imo.

You continued, "Do You in fact have anything to offer this group ?"

Yes.

Now, the better question, imo, would be, "Are those offerings
appreciated?" Certainly not by all, but, hey, such applies to most
human experience.

And more, "Is Your level of social interaction so poor that this is
Your only form of attention?"

My social interaction is not poor, imo. And if by "this" you mean RAB
then, no, I get attention in a variety of forms and so this newsgroup
is certainly not my only form of attention.

In fact, so far as this newsgroup is concerned, attention is not the
goal. Yeah, believe it or not. And, if you've truly lurked for that
year then you are familiar and may agree that I typically react to
someone's comment or, yes, "Question's for" me. ;o)

Regardless, I enjoyed a date on Saturday, an attaboy today at work (in
print no less), and will be serving as a mentor/big brother-type
tonight before hitting the gym.

And you?

You stated, "Also Curt I noticed You tend to make comments as to
people's sexuality," and I'd be interested, therefore, what -
specifically - you would characterize as "comments as to people's
sexuality"?

Furthermore, you commented, "there are some very well known facts about
men who critisize homosexuals," which is certainly not applicable to me
as I have never criticized anyone for their sexual orientation. Again,
what - specifically - would you characterize as such? Especially as it
relates to me. Links, perhaps, to posts? That'd be appreciated,
naturally.

You've asked, "Are You in fact a closet Homosexual ?"

I am not homosexual. I am heterosexual. Some might be curious about
your interest in this matter, however, it seems you're under the false
impression that I've been critical of homosexuals in some way and so
I'm not curious re your interest at all.

Hth.

Another question, by way of review, "Also do You actually have any
tattoing experience ?"

The obvious experience would be of being inked myself:

http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/calvin.html

My favorite, but I also have two other tattoos:

http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/stuff.html

And, yes, more bodyart-related info:

http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/piercings.html

Anything else?

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

No, Thats all, I just needed you to clarify My opinion.
You can crawl back under Your bridge now
"Curt James" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166481240.668750.120610@t46g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Gozzo wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, It would appear Curt has suddenly
>> lost his ability to type.
>
> Not yet.
>
> Eventually, of course, but, no, not yet!
>
>> Curt I have gone to the trouble
>
> Trouble, eh? You're, perhaps, losing your ability to type? Hence the
> trouble? No matter. And, no, not a serious question either.
>
>> of asking You a question,
>
> Excellent. I enjoy questions. Often much more than some RABbits enjoy
> my answers, however.
>
>> could You please be decent enough to reply ?
>
> Certainly. Let's review those questions, shall we?
>
> [...]
>
> But, first, in case you missed my recent post, here's an apparently
> applicable recap:
>
> I prefaced the Subject title as OT because the article is entirely,
> yes, apart from the word tattoo, off topic bodyart. However, Doyel's
> comment re Iverson as, "someone whose immense physical gifts were never
> enough to make him or those around him happy," is certainly apropos
> RAB, imo. There are, apparently, many people who have tattoos and yet
> remain disgruntled and seemingly panties-inna-bunch impaired. Pity.
>
> And you, unfortunately, do seem disgruntled for some reason.
>
> To wit:
>
> You asked, "Curt why do You persist in such infantile behaviour?"
>
> Infantile behaviour would go to opinion, yes, in MY opinion. Much
> pot-kettle-black-edness swirls here. Again, imo.
>
> You continued, "Do You in fact have anything to offer this group ?"
>
> Yes.
>
> Now, the better question, imo, would be, "Are those offerings
> appreciated?" Certainly not by all, but, hey, such applies to most
> human experience.
>
> And more, "Is Your level of social interaction so poor that this is
> Your only form of attention?"
>
> My social interaction is not poor, imo. And if by "this" you mean RAB
> then, no, I get attention in a variety of forms and so this newsgroup
> is certainly not my only form of attention.
>
> In fact, so far as this newsgroup is concerned, attention is not the
> goal. Yeah, believe it or not. And, if you've truly lurked for that
> year then you are familiar and may agree that I typically react to
> someone's comment or, yes, "Question's for" me. ;o)
>
> Regardless, I enjoyed a date on Saturday, an attaboy today at work (in
> print no less), and will be serving as a mentor/big brother-type
> tonight before hitting the gym.
>
> And you?
>
> You stated, "Also Curt I noticed You tend to make comments as to
> people's sexuality," and I'd be interested, therefore, what -
> specifically - you would characterize as "comments as to people's
> sexuality"?
>
> Furthermore, you commented, "there are some very well known facts about
> men who critisize homosexuals," which is certainly not applicable to me
> as I have never criticized anyone for their sexual orientation. Again,
> what - specifically - would you characterize as such? Especially as it
> relates to me. Links, perhaps, to posts? That'd be appreciated,
> naturally.
>
> You've asked, "Are You in fact a closet Homosexual ?"
>
> I am not homosexual. I am heterosexual. Some might be curious about
> your interest in this matter, however, it seems you're under the false
> impression that I've been critical of homosexuals in some way and so
> I'm not curious re your interest at all.
>
> Hth.
>
> Another question, by way of review, "Also do You actually have any
> tattoing experience ?"
>
> The obvious experience would be of being inked myself:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/calvin.html
>
> My favorite, but I also have two other tattoos:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/stuff.html
>
> And, yes, more bodyart-related info:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/piercings.html
>
> Anything else?
>
> --
> Curt
> http://curtjames.com/
>