We need a tattoo group

I'm into Tat's, not so much body modifaction.

Norm³ wrote:

> I'm into Tat's, not so much body modifaction.

http://groups.google.com/groups/create

Seems like a simple enough process. You could create your tattoo group
and then advertise it here, of course. Another place to post notice
would be on BME's http://iam.bmezine.com/ Web community.

And would it be public or restricted? Regardless, best of luck.

--
Curt

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:49:54 -0500, Norm³ who thought that every major
problem could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:

> I'm into Tat's, not so much body modifaction.
>
>

Me too, but RAB is still cool....well...most of the time...
--
Hans

"Forty-two!"
"Is that all you've got to show for seven and a half million years of
work?"
"I checked it very thoroughly", said the computer...

Hans van Eynsbergen wrote:
> Norm³ who thought that every major problem
> could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:
>
> > I'm into Tat's, not so much body modifaction.
>
> Me too, but RAB is still cool....well...most of the time...

Cool on the cool. And my apologies for my portion of the "well...most
of the time..." aspects. Happy New Year to you, Hans!

> Hans

--
Curt

On 2 Jan 2007 12:56:10 -0800, Curt who thought that every major problem
could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:

> Hans van Eynsbergen wrote:
>> Norm³ who thought that every major problem
>> could be solved just with potatoes, wrote:
>>
>>> I'm into Tat's, not so much body modifaction.
>>
>> Me too, but RAB is still cool....well...most of the time...
>
> Cool on the cool. And my apologies for my portion of the "well...most
> of the time..." aspects. Happy New Year to you, Hans!
>
>> Hans

Damn !
Happy new year too !
And to all them RABbers !
--
Hans

"Forty-two!"
"Is that all you've got to show for seven and a half million years of
work?"
"I checked it very thoroughly", said the computer...

Norm" <Logan5@Runs.net> wrote:

> I'm into Tat's,

go away.

The Queen of Just Who're and You Again? wrote:

re Norm³

> go away.

Queen? This is for you:

*Stay* away. Thx.

Hey, but before you crawl back under your rock, how's them earlobes?
Still glad you took my advice? 's cool. Don't mention it.

--
Curt

i would if there was a tat group.

"The Queen of Cans and Jars" <dhrravr@ohatzhapu.bet> wrote in message
news:1hrbgvw.16fia5i143vusoN%dhrravr@ohatzhapu.bet ...
> Norm" <Logan5@Runs.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm into Tat's,
>
> go away.

Norm" <Logan5@Runs.net> wrote:

> i would if there was a tat group.

There are no fucking "tat" groups. The word is TATTOO.

The Queen of You're and Wrong wrote:
> Norm³ wrote:

> > i would if there was a tat group.
>
> There are no fucking "tat" groups.

While, at least according to Google, lace makers and protein inhibitors
far outrank Norm³'s aforementioned tat group, there are certainly tat
groups in the context of tattoos.

This out-of-context-bodyart trivia, however, is kinda interesting, too:


"Most of the Tat groups live over the border in Iran," according to the
search engine.

> The word is TATTOO.

Yes, but many people use the word TAT. And in reference to ink.

Hth.

Otoh, YEEESH!!!! I had to jump more than a few pages into the Google
search string "tat groups" to find the following page:

http://www.instructables.com/id/EXST1ETDDOEQ2W3CNJ/

--
Curt

[bluntmonkey]

Try posting on tattoofans.com :) B

Curt wrote:
> The Queen of You're and Wrong wrote:

QUEEN> > There are no fucking "tat" groups.

QUEEN> > The word is TATTOO.
>
CURT> ( . . . ) many people use the word TAT. And in reference to ink.

And previously in this post you wrote:


CURT> While, at least according to Google, lace makers and protein
inhibitors
CURT> far outrank Norm³'s aforementioned tat group,>

And then:
CURT> Otoh, YEEESH!!!! I had to jump more than a few pages into the
Google
CURT> search string "tat groups" to find the following page


Thanks for proving the point that tat, TAT, or tatt are not good
substitutes for tattoo.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Thanks for proving the point that tat, TAT, or tatt are
> not good substitutes for tattoo.

You're not welcome, Kavin, as I proved no such point. Tat is a typical
substitute for tattoo. My search string was _tat groups_ hence the
limited hits wrt tattoos, however if you change the search string to
_tats_ then the picture changes significantly. Whether it's good or bad
is opinion, of course.

Hth.

> Kavin

--
Curt

Curt wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Thanks for proving the point that tat, TAT, or tatt are
> > not good substitutes for tattoo.
>
> You're not welcome, Kavin, as I proved no such point. Tat is a typical
> substitute for tattoo. My search string was _tat groups_ hence the
> limited hits wrt tattoos,

Great, except that I searched using both Tat and tat Group (Which by
the way, your evaluation of the truth is once again, stilted).

If you had searched for tat group, you would not have received the
responses you state you received.

But then again, maybe it's just intuition.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
[...]

> > My search string was _tat groups_ hence the
> > limited hits wrt tattoos,
>
> Great, except that I searched using both Tat and tat Group

Hey, toots, can you read? I mean, you quoted me, right? See that search
string? Do you, Kavvy? Tat group~*S*~.

Way to go, Eagle Eye Taylor.

> (Which by the way, your evaluation of the truth is once
> again, stilted).
>
> If you had searched for tat group,

I didn't. But, you know, I did search for tat groupS. See the
difference?

> you would not have received the responses you state you received.

I never tire of saying, hey, *typing* this - Kavin, you are wrong! :oD

> But then again, maybe it's just intuition.

No, it's not intuition. It's your typical lack of attention to detail
and, yes, some might say, poor investigation. Someone called you a
terrier once? HA!

Anyway, let's you and me operate under the illusion that you actually
used the search string that I used, okay? I'm feeling generous.

http://www.google.com/search?q=tat+groups

"A thread to the past; Internet tat groups help keep lace-making from
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel," from that URL.

That particular link - the one re lace-making - is the FIRST response
when you search for tat groups.

"[PDF]
Synthesis of nucleoside analogs and new Tat protein inhibitors*
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
They will synthesize these new Tat groups if they find new structural
groups and go on with," also from the URL above.

Hey, whaddyaknow, THAT link is the SECOND response when you search for
tat groups. Odd that such a keen mind as yours would've missed that.

But, wait, there's more!

The "Most of the Tat groups live over the border in Iran," part
appeared as the FOURTH response when you search for, yeah, Kavvy, tat
groups.

Hmm. What else? Oh, the
http://www.instructables.com/id/EXST1ETDDOEQ2W3CNJ/ link that I said I
had to jump more than a few pages into the Google search string "tat
groups" to find? Well, it appears on page 24, you guessed it, when you
search for tat groups.

> Kavin

Yeah.

Go again?

--
Curt