Multiply Your Muscle Gains Using One Simple But Powerful Tool

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:

> > No comment on suicides knowing the time of their death? Right. Better
> > that you stick to name calling, eh? I can almost appreciate your
> > strategy given what you're working with.
>
> Where was suicide referenced here?

What? Kavin, remember that SNL character - The Short Term Memory Guy?

Where was suicide referenced here? Odd question, Kavin, but here's your
answer: Suicide was referenced in this thread when I replied to your,
"Give me one, that's ONE, person that knows the time of their death."

Having a memory lapse there, Kav?

> Did I miss something?

Apparently so.

> I think

I don't believe you did, actually.

> it was just someone wanting to know if they were trailer trash girl.

You may just be mischaracterizing that, Kavin. In fact, she guessed
that she was which, hey, is not automatically the same as "wanting to
know if they were."

To wit: "I guess that would be me?"

> They weren't.

Whoopie.

> I didn't even suggest suicide.

Of course you didn't suggest suicide. Suicide obviously slipped your
mind or you wouldn't've asked for an example of, "one, that's ONE,
person that knows the time of their death."

Duh.

> > And, hey, I'm a reasonable person with a sense of humor, imo.
>
> Curt, really, imo is redundant in writing. But maybe that would have
> been week nine in the extended journalism course. What, E-9?

heh :o)

I love a jog down memory lane, Kavvy. Thanks. With that in mind, I
actually completed the coursework - NAVEDTRA 14148 - for advancement to
E-9. The Navy's big on correspondence-type courses. That manual is the
"Military requirements for senior and master chief petty officer."

> > If that makes me a little trailer trash girl in your eyes, okay.
> > Work with that, Kavin.
>
> Jerry Springer was cancelled.

I wouldn't know. Don't have a TV at home. Occasionally, Maury is on
during lunch, but I haven't seen Jerry Springer since he was in the
newspaper for something or other.

> Work with that, trailer trash girl.

Water, duck's back, yadayada.

> Funny you so willingly accept being a girl.

What I may accept is that you're apparently not in touch with reality.

> Maybe your uncle trained you well.

And maybe your fantasies shore up your self esteem.

> Kavin

--
Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Is there a difference between hope and reality?

Sure. I hope that you'll get a clue, however the reality appears to be
that you most certainly will not.

Hth.

> KAV> > Some of us don't worry about life at all.
> KAV> > Maybe you do. Maybe your uncle gave
> KAV> > you a little more than love.
> >
> C> Yeah, yeah, yeah. Same old song and dance,
> C> eh, Kavin? ZZZZ! Think of something new.
>
> Would that be about, I don't know, ear lobes and
> getting it in the crotch with a volleyball?

HA!

There's a distinction to be made, though, Kavvy. One that you've
obviously divorce yourself from: REALITY!

Ear lobes would be a reference to The Queen of Cans and Jars requesting
advice re her tattooed earlobe. Was it one or both? I don't recall,
however I do remember suggesting she get her ears dermal punched to
erase the tattoo that she'd apparently become disenchanted with. She
liked that advice. She chose to follow that advice - which, hey, was
more of a suggestion or simply a sharing of an idea. It worked for me
and, yes, it seems to have worked for her as well. True story. Not
fiction.

The crotch story? Well, you're apparently and unfortunately intimately
familiar with that episode. Maybe that was a lie? Hey, you hint about
my uncle doing something which I'd more than likely call a lie, so
perhaps the crotch story was just a tall tale you spun to no response.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9aeb6514a4cf14

> You're life is one long nap.

You're?

Your life is one long typo. ;o) But, hey, you're good for a laugh.

Again, hth.

> C> You're incredibly boring, Kavin. Figure it out.
>
> And you are still a train wreck.

train wreck n. a disaster or failure; a disorganized, problematic, or
chaotic person or thing; an incongruous situation.

That's an opinion, Kavin, but it certainly appears that I'm problematic
for you.

> Kavin

--
Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Marie wrote:
> > <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote

> KT> Who's the little trailer trash girl?
> >
> MWC> I guess that would be me? hehehehe
>
> Guess again.
>
> But you can be Skank, if you wish.

When the students start to name call, as children often do, I remind
them that everyone has something different about them that can serve as
the focus for a rude nickname. I tell them to focus on the positive
rather than the negative.

I guess I'm just as prone to that sad fact of human nature as the next
person. Heck, look at all the time I spend with you, Kavin. ;o)

Regardless, what's the characteristic that would serve as a nail to
hang a nickname on, Kavin? You're extra skinny, super fat, greasy hair,
balding, bushy hair, big nose, what? Heck, even the stunningly handsome
can be called pretty boy. There's no escape from nicknames. Especially
from those who choose nicknames based on air. Based on no apparent
reason. Evidenced by your choice of "Skank" currently.

> I'd keep Curt away from your kids.

Literally thousands of students would disagree, Kavin, but, hey, you
hold tight to your fantasies.

> Kavin

--
Curt

Curt wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > Marie wrote:
> > > <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote
>
> > KT> Who's the little trailer trash girl?
> > >
> > MWC> I guess that would be me? hehehehe
> >
> > Guess again.
> >
> > But you can be Skank, if you wish.
>

> There's no escape from nicknames. Especially
> from those who choose nicknames based on air. Based on no apparent
> reason. Evidenced by your choice of "Skank" currently.

Who did I call Skank? Miss Marie thought she was being clever -- she
wasn't. Most people would have seen that I was suggesting that if she
couldn't be one form of trashy woman, she could be another, if that's
what she needs.


KT> > I'd keep Curt away from your kids.
>
> Literally thousands of students would disagree, Kavin, but, hey, you
> hold tight to your fantasies.

And children think gummy bears make a nutritious breakfast. So your
point is?

It's not a fantasy. It's a gut feeling. And that reflects on you.

Kavin



>
> > Kavin
>
> --
> Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Who did I call Skank?

Who cares? Your insults reflect on you and no one else, imo.

> Miss Marie thought

And now you read minds? Interesting.

> she was being clever

Cool.

> -- she wasn't.

No offense, Kavin, but if you say up then I'd bet that saying down is
muuuuch closer to the mark.

[...]

> <snip> children think gummy bears make a
> nutritious breakfast.

I believe you're underestimating children given that statement.

In fact, I'd put money on odds that if someone would ask a random
eight-year-old child whether gummy bears are nutritious that the
eight-year-old would look at that someone and respond, "No." I'd put
even more money on odds that that same child, if asked why, would reply
with a seeming incredulous, "Because it's candy," while wearing an
expression that would more than likely smack entirely of
duh-you-frigging-moron.

> So your point is?

Oh, how about "Duh, you frigging moron!"? Is that a point? Will that
do?

> It's not a fantasy. It's a gut feeling. And that reflects on you.

Kavin, do you have a PhD in idiocy? How does *your* gut feeling reflect
on *me*? Because I was under the impression that a person's behavior,
comments, actions reflect on that person.

I mean, if I call you a name does it reflect on you? I'd say it
doesn't. Likewise if you call me or Marie or anyone else a name, well,
it's no reflection on yours truly or Marie or, yeah, anyone else, but
rather a reflection on you. Likewise your gut feelings are no
reflection on me, imo. Ymmv, obviously.

> Kavin

--
Curt

Curt wrote:

"Duh, you frigging moron!"?

Hmmmmmmmmm . . .

Any post from you after this is pointless.

But then again, that is redundant.

Do I need an "imo"?


Kavin

Curt wrote:

> I was under the impression that a person's behavior,
> comments, actions reflect on that person.

And I, yttrx, The Queen, lish, Nina, etc. have all commented
accordingly. Your point is what?

>
> I mean, if I call you a name does it reflect on you?

You are operating under a fallacy: that I have judged you wrongly.

I have judged you solely on what you have written.

I accept that you think my wanting you dead is a harsh statement. It ,
however, does not negate that I truly think you should not be drawing
breath. Whether you, or Marie, or Hans (and please note the list) find
it appalling is of no concern to me. That is what you don't want to
believe. I CAN HAVE THAT OPINION. Some would call it conviction.
That is something you will never be accused of (just one reason not to
like you, in my book).

Again, you don't try to negate the name, just the messenger.

And that is the only interesting part of your argument.

"Honey, do these jeans make my ass look fat?"

"No, your fat ass makes you look fat."

That doesn't mean your ass isn't fat. You just didn't like the (truth)
delivery.


Kavin

Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Who did I call Skank?
>
> Who cares? Your insults reflect on you and no one else, imo.
>

Don't forget, Kavin, that Curt publically humiliates and abuses
women who reject his sexual advances. He's hardly in a position
to say anything at all.




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yttrx.net

yttrx wrote:
> Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > [...]
> >
KT> >> Who did I call Skank?
> >
C> > Who cares? Your insults reflect on you and no one else, imo.
> >
>
> Don't forget, Kavin, that Curt publically humiliates and abuses
> women who reject his sexual advances. He's hardly in a position
> to say anything at all.

Most true. And you also just pointed out Curt's other problem.

He argues when he doesn't care. He just argues, and not well at that.


Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yttrx wrote:
>> Curt <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
> KT> >> Who did I call Skank?
>> >
> C> > Who cares? Your insults reflect on you and no one else, imo.
>> >
>>
>> Don't forget, Kavin, that Curt publically humiliates and abuses
>> women who reject his sexual advances. He's hardly in a position
>> to say anything at all.
>
> Most true. And you also just pointed out Curt's other problem.
>
> He argues when he doesn't care. He just argues, and not well at that.
>

Right. He argues on RAB because he was rejected from RAB, and like
any woman who does the same, he does everything he can to destroy it.

Really he's about five years old. No wonder he likes hanging out with
children so much.




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yttrx.net

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Do I need an "imo"?

IMO serves as an acronym for a number of things, Kavin.

Although obviously not as widely accepted as In Memory Of, I'm Moving
On, and, yeah, In My Opinion, I'd say you definitely need an "imo" so
far as Immediate Medication for Obsessives goes. I mean, really, Kavin,
you've got it bad.

> Kavin

--
Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression that a person's behavior,
> > comments, actions reflect on that person.
>
> And I, <snip>

Can you speak for yourself without leaning on the collective? Without
calling for backup, Sheriff Taylor? :o) Otoh, Barney Fife might help
brighten your mood.

> have all commented

Hey, they say everyone has an opinion.

> accordingly.

Accordingly? Hmm. Speaking of opinion...

> Your point is what?

What point? I thought we were having a conversation, Kavvy, ol' buddy,
ol' pal.

> > I mean, if I call you a name does it reflect on you?
>
> You are operating under a fallacy: that I have judged you wrongly.

Again with the mind reading. I'm not operating, Kavin. I'm posting. I'm
replying. If you call it judging, well, that's on you. That's your
perception. Regardless, wrongly or rightly is entirely opinion.

> I have judged you solely on what you have written.

And?

> I accept that you think my wanting you dead is a harsh statement.

I don't believe I characterized that statement at all. I did, however,
state that your words reflect on you. Perhaps that's too fine a
distinction for you to wrap your head around.

> It , however, does not negate that I truly think you should not
> be drawing breath.

How do you survive in this world, Kavin, with such an obviously
inferior ability to handle the stress of even something as low-key as
Usenet?

(picks up pencil)

HEY, KAVIN, I'M AN ART TEACHER! LOOK AT ME *DRAWING* BREATH!

ahahahHAHA!

Never mind.

> Whether you, or <snip>

Well, how very fair of you to include names for my side, Kavin.
Unnecessary, however, as, unlike you, I'm not stressing our interaction
at all.

> (and please note the list)

What list? The list of unsolicited names you've compiled as possibly
being upset by your statements? If people share my viewpoint then
they're simply amused by your posts.

> find it appalling is of no concern to me.

Cool.

> That is what you don't want to believe.

Belief is where it's at, Kavvy. Have some faith, I say, however that
doesn't mean that everything a person believes in will automatically be
fact, truth, or even remotely related to reality.

> I CAN HAVE THAT OPINION.

Have I told you that you may not hold a particular opinion? Have I
stated that you're forbidden to post your thoughts? I don't recall ever
taking that position, Kavin.

Oh, I've contradicted you. I've pointed out your errors. I've answered
many of your ignorant questions - questions that resulted from, I'm
guessing, you not thinking things through. But I don't recall telling
you what opinions you may or may not have or hold dear. No.

> Some would call it conviction.

Some might call it overreactiing. ;o)

> That is something you will never be accused of (just one
> reason not to like you, in my book).

Oh, I have convictions. You're not forgetting my belief that there are
no bad tattoos, are you, Kavin? It's simple, really. Every tattoo is
art. That's fact. It's ink in skin. Some images that result will be
liked while others will be disliked. Simply because you may not like a
certain tattoo does not make that particular tattoo bad. No. Your
characterizing any tattoo as bad simply serves as an example of your
ability to form and voice an opinion.

Semantics perhaps. Nevertheless, it's truth, yes, imo.

Get over it, Kavin. Form some convictions that matter.

> Again, you don't try to negate the name, just the messenger.

Whatever.

> And that is the only interesting part of your argument.

I'm not taking part in an argument, Kavin. I'm replying to your post.

Hth.

> "Honey, do these jeans make my ass look fat?"
>
> "No, your fat ass makes you look fat."
>
> That doesn't mean your ass isn't fat.

Uh, what?

> You just didn't like

I'm all about the like. FEELIN' THE LOOOOVE!

> the (truth) delivery.

Opinion, Kavin. But what I'd describe as poor delivery on your part.

> Kavin

--
Curt

Curt wrote:

> poor delivery on your part.

Is that like a bad tattoo?

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> "Honey, do these jeans make my ass look fat?"
Kgc> "No, your fat ass makes you look fat."

http://www.jerkcity.com/jerkcity112.html

lish "do you think you can forget anything?
crank@got.net i am the saint of indecency." -jc
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

yttrx wrote:

> He's hardly in a position
> to say anything at all.

And even more so, he hasn't.

Kavin