Can anyone find this tattoo pic?

Hi,

I remember seeing a pic of a tattoo that I thought was awesome, only I
forgot to save it. It's a picture of the tattoo on an upturned hand, with
the palm and fingers covered with a spider web, with a (tattooed) spider
sitting in the web. From what I can remember it was done in black and
various greys. I'd love to have a copy of this pic, so if anyone out there
knows where I can find a copy, please let me know. Thanks!

[shaneink]

hey i have seen the pic but cant remember where i will look in my recently used and remind you if i can find it myself....

shaneink wrote:
> hey i have seen the pic but cant remember where i will look in my
> recently used and remind you if i can find it myself....

Okay, first I'm hoping you aren't a tattoo "artist".

And then, Jesus Christ on a Pogo Stick, go look at a pair of motocross
gloves.

Yeah, it's original.

I'll bet WalMart carries the gloves.


Kavin

<KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1169517718.314035.165260@11g2000cwr.googlegro ups.com...
>
> shaneink wrote:
>> hey i have seen the pic but cant remember where i will look in my
>> recently used and remind you if i can find it myself....
>
> Okay, first I'm hoping you aren't a tattoo "artist".

None of your business *what* I am.

>
> And then, Jesus Christ on a Pogo Stick, go look at a pair of motocross
> gloves.
>
> Yeah, it's original.
>
> I'll bet WalMart carries the gloves.

Perhaps you could check next time you're stocking shelves there. If you're
not too busy showing off your pierced genitals at the gay clubs or acting
the keyboard Rambo around here.

mentalguy2004 wrote:
> KavinTay... wrote
> > shaneink wrote:

> >> hey i have seen the pic but cant remember where i will look in my
> >> recently used and remind you if i can find it myself....

I took a peek, too, but couldn't find anything that fit the
description.

> > Okay, first I'm hoping you aren't a tattoo "artist".
>
> None of your business *what* I am.

True dat!

Otoh, I'm not certain that ol' Kavvy was directing that at you or
shaneink.

> > And then, Jesus Christ on a Pogo Stick, go look at a pair of motocross
> > gloves.
>
> > Yeah, it's original.
>
> > I'll bet WalMart carries the gloves.
>
> Perhaps you could check next time you're stocking shelves there.

I <3 WalMart.

> If you're not too busy showing off your pierced genitals at the gay clubs

Um, I think he just talks about them, actually. That, probably, but
they definitely serve as target practice for volleyball players. See:

http://tinyurl.com/eugjm

i LOVE that story. <snerk>

> or acting the keyboard Rambo around here.

He does act "the keyboard Rambo" oftener than not, though, eh? ;o)

--
Curt

On Feb 6, 2:23 pm, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:
> <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1169517718.314035.165260@11g2000cwr.googlegro ups.com...
>
>
>
> > shaneink wrote:
shank> >> hey i have seen the pic but cant remember where i will look
in my
shank> >> recently used and remind you if i can find it myself....
>
kt> > Okay, first I'm hoping you aren't a tattoo "artist".
>
ment> None of your business *what* I am.

I've read your post -- rocket scientist isn't popping to mind.
>
kt> > And then, Jesus Christ on a Pogo Stick, go look at a pair of
motocross
kt> > gloves.
>
kt> > Yeah, it's original.
>
kt> > I'll bet WalMart carries the gloves.
>
ment> Perhaps you could check next time you're stocking shelves there.

Almost clever.


ment> If you're
ment> not too busy showing off your pierced genitals at the gay clubs

why, is that where you hang out? The only pierced genitals you've
seen are there? Come on, do fill us in on your social life.

>or acting
> the keyboard Rambo around here.

Better than the keyboard idiot, wouldn't you say?

At least I'll call you bad.
Or worse.


And maybe if you learn to read for comprehension, you'll look better
to the masses.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "mentalguy2004" wrote:
[...]

> ment> None of your business *what* I am.
[...]


> Almost clever.

Sadly, Kavin, you are not. :oS

[...]

> >or acting the keyboard Rambo around here.
>
> Better than the keyboard idiot, wouldn't you say?

Not necessarily. One, it's opinion. Two, although Stallone's pretty
entertaining, the Brothers Howard made themselves no small amount of
change. Better? Who can say?

> At least I'll call you bad.

The stereo in my mind's *ear* is playing a familiar Michael Jackson
tune.

WHO'S BAD?!!! :oD

> Or worse.

That's nice.

> And maybe if you learn to read for comprehension,
> you'll look better to the masses.

Hmm. I must've snipped your mention of "us" somewhere along the line.
Meh. Regardless, I still encourage you to speak for yourself.

And what's this "the masses" you refer to? Your massive audience?

ahahahahaHHHAHAAH! Yeah, they're out there.

Pssst, it's mostly just you and me, Kavvy. Pull up a chair and let's
talk tattoos. I'll go first. The drive-thru employee at the local Taco
Bell recently offered, "I like your ears." My hand immediately went to
my lobe as I wasn't sure what - if any - jewelry I was wearing. I
thanked her, paid, and then drove my three softshell tacos to the
nearby laundromat for a date with two hampers filled with underoos.

None bunched, btw. ;o)

--
Curt

On Feb 7, 5:57 am, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > Better than the keyboard idiot, wouldn't you say?
>
> Not necessarily. One, it's opinion. Two, although Stallone's pretty
> entertaining, the Brothers Howard made themselves no small amount of
> change. Better? Who can say?

You really do need to learn your definitions. Are you saying the
Three Stooges were retarded? There is a difference between buffoon
and idiot.

The village idiot was ridiculed. He was laughed at, not with.

And keep on with your 'opinion' diatribe. Your opinion still has no
value. Yes, my opinion. Unlike you, I CAN back mine up.

> Pssst, it's mostly just you and me, Kavvy. Pull up a chair and let's
> talk tattoos. I'll go first. The drive-thru employee at the local Taco
> Bell recently offered, "I like your ears." My hand immediately went to
> my lobe as I wasn't sure what - if any - jewelry I was wearing. I
> thanked her, paid, and then drove my three softshell tacos to the
> nearby laundromat for a date with two hampers filled with underoos.


Did I miss the post about a lobe tattoo?

You're making that journalism class look better and better.


Kavin

KavinTaylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:

> > > Better than the keyboard idiot, wouldn't
> > > you say?
>
> > Not necessarily. One, it's opinion. Two,
> > although Stallone's pretty entertaining, the
> > Brothers Howard made themselves no small
> > amount of change. Better? Who can say?
>
> You really do need to learn your definitions.

Ah, yes, definitions. More on that momentarily. ;o)

> Are you saying the Three Stooges were retarded?

Not at all, hence the "made themselves no small amount of change"
comment, Kavvy. Of course, I'm certain that there are many examples of
stupid people who have earned a chunk of change in their time.

> There is a difference between buffoon and idiot.

Of course, which, imo, dovetails neatly with "You really do need to
learn your definitions."

http://onlinedictionary.datasegment.com/word/idiot

Definitions, definitions, definitions. Yes.

> The village idiot was ridiculed. He was laughed
> at, not with.
>
> And keep on with your 'opinion' diatribe.

Speaking (or writing) of definitions, perhaps you'll look up the word
diatribe as well. ;o)

> Your opinion still has no value.

Zat right?

> Yes, my opinion.

Okay.

> Unlike you,

Absolutely, Kavin. You are most definitely unlike me.

> I CAN back mine up.

Well, then, wrt your Three Stooges query, Kav, explain this:

http://movies.go.com/the-three-stoog...d814261/comedy

"THE THREE STOOGES - IDIOTS DE LUXE FACTS

Larry, Curly and Moe get into a lot of madcap mischief in these
classic comedy adventures. Titles are "Idiots Deluxe," "I Can Hardly
Wait" and "Idle Roomers."

Cast Three Stooges (more)

Genre(s) Comedy

Release Year 1943

Keywords Buddies, Comedy, Short Stories, Vintage, Morons" From the
preceding URL.

Whuddyaknow! Now, about that backing up schtufff... HAW!!!

> > Pssst, it's mostly just you and me, Kavvy.
> > Pull up a chair and let's talk tattoos. I'll go first.
> > The drive-thru employee at the local Taco
> > Bell recently offered, "I like your ears." My
> > hand immediately went to my lobe as I wasn't
> > sure what - if any - jewelry I was wearing. I
> > thanked her, paid, and then drove my three
> > softshell tacos to the nearby laundromat
> > for a date with two hampers filled with
> > underoos.
>
> Did I miss the post about a lobe tattoo?

You probably did. But, thankfully, I didn't.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...2b4feb4d3d9ff9

Queen might agree. Or, rather, she did. :oD

Seriously, I was going with the alliteration, don'tchaknow?

> You're making that journalism class look
> better and better.

You, otoh, could use a few tips. Perhaps this post will be of some
help.

> Kavin

--
Curt

On Feb 7, 7:46 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> KavinTaylor wrote:

KT> > Did I miss the post about a lobe tattoo?
>
IDIOT> You probably did. But, thankfully, I didn't.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...2b4feb4d3d9ff9

No, dickweed, when did you, that is, when did Curt James, get an ear
lobe tattoo?

Oh, wait, you didn't.

And learn the definition of alliteration.

You are so lucky you are employed. Keep it up. I 'can' help with
that.


Kavin

KavinTaylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
> > KavinTaylor wrote:
>
> KT> > Did I miss the post about a lobe tattoo?
>
> IDIOT>

Ha! Again, opinion.

> You probably did. But, thankfully, I didn't.
> >http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...2b4feb4d3d9ff9
>
> No, dickweed, when did you, that is, when
> did Curt James, get an ear lobe tattoo?

Ah, but that wasn't the question, Kavin. You asked, "Did I miss the
post about a lobe tattoo?" Yeah, there just might be a "dickweed"
involved hereabouts. ;o) Of course, I didn't call you a dickweed.

> Oh, wait, you didn't.

Isn't that what I just said?

> And learn the definition of alliteration.

You think so? No.

I wrote: "Pssst, it's mostly just you and me, Kavvy. Pull up a hair
and let's talk tattoos."

Talk tattoos. Hmm. Let's check that against ye olde alliteration
definition:

"The repetition of the same sound, usually of a consonant, at the
beginning of two or more words immediately succeeding each other or at
short intervals." Source: One wonderful web page proudly placed on the
incredible Internet!

Hth.

> You are so lucky you are employed.

Blessed, in fact.

> Keep it up.

Will do.

> I 'can' help with that.

Whiiiiich brings things full circle back to the aforementioned mg
quote re you, "acting the keyboard Rambo around here."

> Kavin

:o)

--
Curt

On Feb 7, 8:28 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

<snipped>

Once again, Curt, you are an idiot.

No, you have no ear lobe tattoo. You said "let's talk about tattoos"
then went into something about your ear lobes. No tattoos on YOUR
lobes. Piercings. Period

What is your obsession about the Queen? (You don't have to answer,
the Queen and I know).

And the suggestion about your job. Do take it seriously.

Really.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Once again, Curt, you are an idiot.

Opinion.

> No, you have no ear lobe tattoo. You said "let's
> talk about tattoos"

Inaccurate.

You might want to review that quote.

> then went into something about your ear
> lobes. No tattoos on YOUR lobes.

How's that box you're confined to, Kavin? I stated, "talk tattoos" and
that versus bodyart in general can't be too much of a stretch, can it?
Pity. But not surprising. You're a bit like that, I've noticed.

> Piercings.

Again, inaccurate.

> Period

Dermal punch. ;o)

Yeah, period.

I mean, as long as you're going to be all specific and such, yes? Or
would you like to have it both ways?

It's cool. I understand.

> What is your obsession about the Queen?
> (You don't have to answer, the Queen and I
> know).

No obsession. No diatribe. Post and reply. As per usual. You might
have noticed.

> And the suggestion about your job.

What suggestion was that?

> Do take it seriously.

I take my job seriously. Trust me.

> Really.

Really.

> Kavin

Whatever arguments you believe you have are apparently so much vapor,
Kavin. You've an obvious bias as you've stated somethingsomething
"hate" and somethingsomething "die" wrt yours truly. How credible is
any complaint from you? Not at all, imo. Ymmv.

Hth.

--
Curt

On Feb 7, 10:24 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
>
C> How's that box you're confined to, Kavin? I stated, "talk tattoos"
and
C> that versus bodyart in general can't be too much of a stretch, can
it?

So when you say to you class "Today, we will discuss oil painting" and
then you start talking about the oboe, it's really the same thing,
because they can both be considered part of "the arts?"

Admit it, you mis-wrote. That would be easier to defend.

C> Whatever arguments you believe you have are apparently so much
vapor,
C> Kavin. You've an obvious bias as you've stated somethingsomething
C> "hate" and somethingsomething "die" wrt yours truly. How credible
is
C> any complaint from you?

Very credible. I have not wavered. I'll state it again. You should
be dead. I can back up that argument with very cogent reasons, if
you need.

And believe me, your bias is much more evident.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
[...]

> C> How's that box you're confined to, Kavin?
> C> I stated, "talk tattoos" and that versus
> C> bodyart in general can't be too much of a
> C> stretch, can it?
>
> So when you say to you class "Today, we
> will discuss oil painting" and then you start
> talking about the oboe, it's really the same thing,
> because they can both be considered part of
> "the arts?"

Comparing classroom instruction to a Usenet discussion doesn't work
very well, imo.

> Admit it, you mis-wrote.

Newp.

> That would be easier to defend.

Defense is unnecessary when the offense is so weak. ;o)

> C> Whatever arguments you believe you have
> C> are apparently so much vapor, Kavin. You've
> C> an obvious bias as you've stated
> C> somethingsomething "hate" and
> C> somethingsomething "die" wrt yours truly.
> C> How credible is any complaint from you?
>
> Very credible.

I disagree.

> C> I have not wavered.

I hadn't noticed.

> C> I'll state it again. You should be dead.

And that statement reflects on you.

> I can back up that argument with very
> cogent reasons, if you need.

Really? So persuade me, Kavin.

> And believe me, your bias is much more
> evident.

How so?

> Kavin

--
Curt