A Change of Heart for five hundred, Alex.

But enough about me, Kavin. How's your musical?

;o)

--
Curt

But enough about me, Kavin. How's your musical?

:o)

--
Curt

On 24 jan, 22:27, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

How would you characterize things? You're making some
> intelligent statement while I'm being a crackpot moron without a shred
> of intelligence? No.

*Precisely!
Even an orang utang scores an higher IQ than you do.
That much WE (the mysterious RAB) agree on...

forg wrote:
> Curt wrote:

> > How would you characterize things?
> > You're making some intelligent statement
> > while I'm being a crackpot moron without a
> > shred of intelligence? No.
>
> *Precisely!
> Even an orang utang scores an higher IQ than
> you do.
> That much WE (the mysterious RAB) agree on...

Cool.

Back to the clubhouse then. I believe the musical is almost starting.
Enjoy! And do give my regards to the rest of the Mystery Machine. ;o)

--
Curt

On Jan 25, 7:10 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are tattoos.

So according to Curt, no good (now he adds) no bad. Just the
existence.

And it was tattoo, then tattoo art, then art.

So art has no value.

Nice. That argument is why you might lose your job. You and other art
and music teachers. Why are school systems cutting those programs?
They don't see the value in them, or at least they aren't as valued as,
say, history. And your argument is their argument.

Bravo.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:

> > There are tattoos.

Yes, there most certainly are.

> So according to Curt, no good (now he adds) no bad. Just the existence.

And what comes with that existence, Kavin?

Bzzt! Time's up. Opportunity!

> And it was tattoo, then tattoo art, then art.

The opportunity for anyone to offer their opinion on a particular
tattoo, tattoo art, or, yes, all art.

> So art has no value.

Not so, Kavin.

But speaking of value, of what value are you?

> Nice.

No, your nice value is at an ebb, imo. ;o)

> That argument is why you might lose
> your job. You and other art and music
> teachers.

Hogwash. Balderdash. Nonsense. Hey, no surprise, of course, but, once
again, you are wrong.

> Why are school systems cutting those programs?

I know why. Do you?

> They don't see the value in them,

Incorrect.

> or at least they aren't as valued as,
> say, history.

Wrong again.

While English, Reading/Language Arts, and Mathematics is the focus of
daily curriculum moreso than Art and Music, it's more to do with dollar
signs than those subjects being viewed as more important to student
success.

> And your argument is their argument.
>
> Bravo.

Kudos on your ignorance? No. Try again.

But, hey, before you do, please share more info on your musical. What?
You think I'm kidding? It's probably the first interesting thing you've
offered here in RAB. Yes, the volleyball to the crotch offered some
human drama - and, I suspect, not a small amount of pain - however the
musical gets higher scores from this reader.

Spill. You do seem to enjoy blowing your own horn, so where's the harm?
Especially since you've been asked this time.

> Kavin

--
Curt

On Jan 26, 4:34 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> But, hey, before you do, please share more info on your musical. What?
> You think I'm kidding?

Oh, I'm sure you aren't kidding. And leveling is a simple
psychological ploy. I call you out on your lack of an art web page
and you try on the musical.

Funny, I just gave you the musical. You've been an "artist" how long?
Still stinging on the good and bad art thing?

Believe me, you will be the last to know.

And you're still wrong.

Good and bad.

Good and bad.

Good and bad.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > But, hey, before you do, please share more
> > info on your musical. What? You think
> > I'm kidding?
>
> Oh, I'm sure you aren't kidding.

I doubt you're sure of anything, Kavin.

> And leveling is a simple psychological ploy.

Really? And what kind of ploy is it when someone refuses to allow
someone else to hold a differing opinion? ;o)

Again, get over yourself. After all, how difficult could that be?

> I call you out on your lack of an art web
> page

Ha! Is that what this is? You're enacting some wild west fantasy?

"I'm callin' you out, pad-nuh!"

No. It appears that your memory is worse than mine.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e2b892df0f1e9a

> and you try on the musical.

Hey, you brought it up. No details? No biggie.

> Funny, I just gave you the musical. You've
> been an "artist" how long?

I've been alive for more than forty years. I was awarded that first
blue ribbon in an art contest when i was a pre-teen.

> Still stinging on the good and bad art thing?

You've got no barb, Kavvy, so there is no sting. I am, however, still
holding to the beauty is in the eye of the beholder opinion. Care to
dispute that some more?

Regardless, your opinion wrt that saying has no impact on my opinion.
Care for a hug?

> Believe me, you will be the last to know.

Cool.

> And you're still wrong.

You're the expert on wrong, Kavin.

> Good and bad.

Broken and record!

> Good and bad.

Re and Peat?

> Good and bad.

Boring and schtufff.

> Kavin

Again, art is subjective. Imo, there are no bad tattoos. There are,
however, tattoos that you like or that you don't like for personal
reasons.

Good and bad. Meh. It's just *your opinion*. Subjectivity, beauty in
the eye of the beholder, a face only a mother could love, etc.

Substantiating an opinion or offering a reason behind naming something
a bad tattoo is always appreciated, but your opinion remains just that
- an opinion.

Now, Kavin, do you have anything to say about art or shall I give the
ride operator another token so we can continue to go 'round and
'round?

--
Curt