Scrotals. scrotals, scrotals

mentalguy2004 wrote:
[...]

> This place isn't what it used to be LOL. When each of my
> kids was around 5 or 6, the teachers made the class sit
> and repeat "penis, testicles, penis, testicles" over and
> over, to *de-sensitise* them from the words. Then they
> could begin the basic biology lessons without the sniggers.

Interesting strategy.

> I dunno, most newsgroups seem to be the same way
> nowadays.
> There's always a few cliques and an obligatory loudmouth
> who thinks he knows everything about everything and makes
> sure all the newbies don't come back. Maybe it's a jealousy
> thing..... the fear that a newbie might go out and get a
> tat/piercing that's better than *his*. So let's not encourage
> or guide anyone, and then we'll still be the only people in
> the world who have the experience and knowledge
> neccessary to answer questions around here.

That may just be a very accurate analysis. Or not. Regardless, RAB is
as it ever was, imo. Fewer participants, perhaps, but just as
argumentative as ever. And still a bit of bodyart bantering, as well.
I <3 RAB!

> Insecurity.

Not much doubt about that, imo.

--
Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > > "Curt" wrote:
>
> C> You're apparently very grumpy, negative,
> C> bitter, angry, and, hey, based on your
> C> experience with volleyballs, I'd say, rather
> C> unlucky. I suspect your issues are based
> C> at least in part on those attributes.
>
> See, that's why YOU will never get better, Curt.

Hey, how could you improve on perfection? ;o)

> Grumpy, negative, bitter, etc. don't "cause"
> issues.

Are YOU in the DSM-IV?

> And by the way, why don't you ask the people on
> RAB who have met me what my demeanor is.

You sure about that, Kavvy? Would that be "the list that includes
Hans, modified heart, radio, etc."? Your names. See also:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...26f9744?hl=en&

Kavin E. Taylor, Super Geeeeenius! ;o)

> Wanting you dead doesn't make me bitter,
> grumpy or angry.

It hasn't made you a ray of sunshine either, though.

> And your death isn't going to make me
> ecstaic, either.

Um, ecstaic? What's that Kavinspeak for? ;o)

Regardless, may you live to 200 years, Kavin. I'm, of course, planning
on at least, um, FOREVER!

> I know

Do you?

> there are more silly, vapid, weak people just
> like you

Just like me? Cool. LUCKY THEM! :oD

> who will still exist.

Yes, exist and will continue to exist, I strongly suspect. Especially
since what you consider silly, vapid, and weak, others consider
humorous, laid back, and flexible.

> I know

I doubt you know jack, actually.

> the damage you have already done cannot
> be undone.

i don't get your joke.

> And I know you don't care <snip>

About you? About causing more of your so-called damage? Weird.

> because you just don't

I just don't

> get it.

get your joke! :oD

> You keep acting

muahahahahah

It's all just an act.

Actually, it's all just in your head. A guess.

> as if you are taking the high ground

Hey, higher ground than your typical shoelaces nonsense.

> but you bring up me taking a volleyball
> to the genitals.

And your face. Don't forget your face.

Seriously, you're the one who put that subject on the table. Fair
game, right? You've taken a similar course of action, haven't you?

Yes.

> Hey, that's your "issue."

Thank you, Doctor Taylor.

> Why does that give you a charge, Curt?

I wouldn't necessarily call it a charge, but, if it is, then, perhaps
because you typically try to cause people figurative harm with your -
what I'll characterize as idiotic - attempts at insults. No surprise
that a rational man might find some enjoyment from you suffering some
literal harm whether it's a shot to the jewels or a crack in yer mug.
Hey, it's only a volleyball and you stated you suffered no long-
lasting physical damage, so where's the harm, right?

What I see - and I doubt very much that I'm alone on this count - is
someone who seems to be able to dish it out (well, kinda, albeit
weakly) while having absolutely no ability whatsoever to take it.

> You like lists, let's try one:
> 13 year-old sweaty girls, genitals, pain, maybe
> a little blood.

You're referencing your one volleyball post. A good one! See also:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...4a4cf14?hl=en&

> Did it turn you on?

Let me check that list again. Hmmm. "13 year-old sweaty girls,
genitals, pain, maybe a little blood." Kavin, Kim Basinger's not on
that list. I don't know what turns you on (and, no, I don't want to
know, either), but that list doesn't do it for me. Hth.

> Is that what it's all about, Curt?

Haven't you been listening (or reading), Kavin? it's all about ME! :o)
Duh.

> Come on, RAB's dead,

RAB's Dead, Long Live RAB!

> remember?

i don't get your joke.

> No one's watching.

i don't get your joke.

> You can admit it.

That's not funny either. Hey, are these even jokes? Jeez. You're not
being serious, are you? Now that would be funny.

> C> While I, on the other hand, am generally
> C> happy, possessed of a good humor (yeah,
> C> and modesty), and having been blessed with
> C> the opportunity to have participated in the lives
> C> of young people for the past seven years.
[...]

> <snip> are those the Black young people?

So, you're on my side and not fr0glet's. Thanks!

> Kavin

You. Got. Nuthin.

--
Curt

On Feb 26, 5:28 am, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:

> Maybe it's a
> jealousy thing..... the fear that a newbie might go out and get a
> tat/piercing that's better than *his*.

Well, you can't ask Curt. He says there are no bad tattoos.
Therefore, you can't have one "better" than his.

Nevertheless, your theory is juvenile and basically shit.

Jealous of you?


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.

And it's not a tat. And aren't you British? YOU should know better.

Kavin

(Yeah, come on Curt. What's the originality thing you bitch about?
I'll list: bad, tat, who are you to judge)

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "mentalguy2004" wrote:
>
> > Ummm.... you're repeating my lines back
> > to me like a 6-year-old. Not very good at
> > this are you? Run along now
>
> Two things. Tradition says I quote what
> I'm replying to, because,

Quoting is not the same as repeating or rewording slightly what others
have said.

> with fucktards like Curt,

Otoh...

i don't get your joke.

> there can be no misunderstandings that
> way.

Kavin, there can always be misunderstandings. Wtf?

> And second, I don't fucking care what
> you think.

HA!

Yeeeeaaahh. That's obvious. <snerk>

> Do you have a life?

Oooh, oooh! I know you do, Kavvy, because you spend a good bit of it
with me. What's it like taking a text-based beating each day. Hey,
that's not my estimation either. Take it from Lubbert, Kavvy!

> It appears your only life is on the Internet,
> what with your number of posts.

Where? Who? mg? Are you stalking him? Because I don't see an enormous
amount of RAB posts dripping from his pen.

> Of course they say nothing,

Like yours do. Har!

> so that shouldn't take too long if
> you key quickly.

Yeesh. Argue with yourself? Hedge your bets? Whatever.

> If Curt's your aspiration,

Then God bless 'im!

> I know 6-year-olds smarter than you.

Kavvy, I seriously know 6-year-olds with much better senses of humor
than you. But like THAT's tough to beat.

> Why do I suspect you would waddle along?

And, yeah:

i don't get your joke.

> Kavin

--
Curt

On Feb 26, 7:35 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:

>
c> Are YOU in the DSM-IV?

I'll bet you are. But really, is that something to be proud of?

>
> > And by the way, why don't you ask the people on
> > RAB who have met me what my demeanor is.
>
> You sure about that, Kavvy? Would that be "the list that includes
> Hans, modified heart, radio, etc."?

That's why you appear stupid (well, and are stupid). I wrote "met."

And we all know about the group that met you and what their opinions
are of you. Care to go there?

> Kavin E. Taylor, Super Geeeeenius! ;o)

And if you knew anything about me, you'd know why this is one of the
most ridiculous lines ever.

> > Wanting you dead doesn't make me bitter,
> > grumpy or angry.
>
> It hasn't made you a ray of sunshine either, though.

Opinion. Yours. And yours doesn't count. No bad, no good.

> Especially
> since what you consider silly, vapid, and weak, others consider
> humorous, laid back, and flexible.

Really? You actually believe that? Whatever gets you through the
night. But right now, I'm thinking you have to get your hand drunk
before you'll ever get laid again. And through in some Roofies.

<snipped>

I'm bored with your nonsense.

Try keeping a quote intact and you MIGHT score some points.


Kavin

On Feb 26, 7:47 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

That hard-on is still flaring up, huh?


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:

> > > And by the way, why don't you ask
> > > the people on RAB who have met
> > > me what my demeanor is.
>
> > You sure about that, Kavvy? Would that
> > be "the list that includes Hans, modified
> > heart, radio, etc."?
>
> That's why you appear stupid

I do, eh? More on that in a moment.

> (well, and are stupid). I wrote "met."

That automatically means in person?

> And we

Define we.

> all know

Define fantasy.

> about the group that met you and
> what their opinions are of you.

Expand, please.

> Care to go there?

Of course!

> > Kavin E. Taylor, Super
> > Geeeeenius! ;o)
>
> And if you knew anything about me,

I know enough.

> you'd know why this is one of the
> most ridiculous lines ever.

Your behavior is what I consider ridiculous.

[...]

> <snip> Whatever gets you through the
> night. <snip> And through in some Roofies.

Before or after the typo? Eh, genius?

[...]

> I'm bored with your nonsense.

Cool.

> Try keeping a quote intact

Write with that in mind, if my response manner is bothersome. Or not.
After all, it's just my nonsense. Still bored?

Cooler.

> and you MIGHT score some points.

Coolest!

Are points where it's at? I was wondering about YOUR motivation. ;o)

You got nuthin.

--
Curt

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> <snip>-<snip>

Is that hyphen really necessary, Kavvy?

I mean, I know it's not a semicolon and so you're probably not
concerned, but, hey.

Hmmm. More commas? ;o)

--
Curt

On Feb 27, 6:50 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
kt>That's why you appear stupid (well, and are stupid). I wrote
"met."
>
stupidcurt> That automatically means in person?

And you think it means anything else? Oh wait, I'll bet you believe
you really know someone having "met" them on the Internet. Once again
see just how perilous your world is, Mr. Sunshine?


kt> > <snip> Whatever gets you through the
kt> > night. <snip> And through in some Roofies.
>
C> Before or after the typo? Eh, genius?

There are no typos there Curt.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
[...]
> <snip> That automatically means in person?
>
> And you think it means anything else?

Of course.

You've never met me in person, but certainly we have a relationship of
sorts. We've met after a fashion, Kavin. I mean, you seem to have
determined that I should be dead. How did you make that determination?
By reading what I've written, yes? By meeting my words if not my
person.

And, certainly, if you've read RAB for any length of time, you've also
read some RABbits issue that they're the same in person as they are in
text. So, what's the difference?

> Oh wait, I'll bet you believe you really know
> someone having "met" them on the Internet.

In a way, yes.

> Once again see just how perilous your
> world is, Mr. Sunshine?

You'd do well to spend some time in my world, imo. :o)

> kt> > <snip> Whatever gets you through the
> kt> > night. <snip> And through in some Roofies.
>
> C> Before or after the typo? Eh, genius?
>
> There are no typos there Curt.

No? I assumed you meant "And throw in some Roofies." Oh, well.

There *will* be other typos.

> Kavin

--
Curt