Scrotals. scrotals, scrotals

Yes, three new scrotal piercings for my birthday.

No, no video.

But a few of you might be getting email in a couple of weeks.

Just remind yourself-- it's not Sputnik.


Kavin

<KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172195046.977831.43010@v45g2000cwv.googlegro ups.com...
>
> snip "me me me" post


Nice to see you're using the subject line to sum up the general quality and
interest level of your posts. I'd say "a load of old bollocks", but scrotals
will do.

mentalguy2004 wrote:
[...]

> Nice to see you're using the subject line to <snip!>

But enough about ol' grumpy! :oD

What up, mg?

Of course, I'm prone to scribble on and on about myself as well, but
re the subject line (and seeing as how what'shisface seems to love
mentioning my teaching gig), did you see the recent news bit about the
children's book being banned for using the word scrotum?

Apparently so.

(Google search string: children's books, scrotum)

"The Higher Power of Lucky," by Susan Patron, this year's winner of
the Newbery Medal, the most prestigious award in children's
literature. <snip> On electronic mailing lists like Librarian.net,
dozens of literary blogs and pages on the social-networking site
LiveJournal, teachers, authors and school librarians took sides over
the book. Librarians from all over the country, including Missoula,
Mont.; upstate New York; Central Pennsylvania; and Portland, Ore.,
weighed in, questioning the role of the librarian when selecting - or
censoring, some argued - literature for children. /copy and paste from
text @: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/18/bo...rssnyt&emc=rss

While listening to NPR today, the one radio personality quipped that
the librarians were becoming testy!

ba dump bump :o)

Another person said that the whole idea was to get children to read
and what better way to do that than with the enticement of "forbidden"
words. They said every other page should have the word included.
Someone else in the cast joked they should have a picture of a breast
on every other page to which the one man said he's thinking of that
for his next book - the one he's going to purchase as well as the one
he's going to write.

ba dump bump, the sequel ;o)

Uh, anyway.

[...]

--
Curt

On Feb 24, 3:54 pm, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:

Glad to see you're interested in my nut sack.

Should I be concerned?


Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> But a few of you might be getting email in a couple of weeks.

i'd better be in that list.

lish "who the hell are you
crank@got.net & why are you talking to me?" -pm
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

On Feb 25, 3:51 am, c...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.) wrote:
> KavinTay...@gmail.com <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Kgc> But a few of you might be getting email in a couple of weeks.
>
> i'd better be in that list.

Top of the list, baby.


Kavin

On Feb 24, 8:36 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Of course, I'm prone to scribble on and on about myself as well, but
> re the subject line (and seeing as how what'shisface seems to love
> mentioning my teaching gig),

Did I mention it here?

Didn't your loving uncle give you enough attention? That was
rhetorical. Of course he did. I bet lots and lots of attention.

Granny didn't love you like she said?

Really, Curt, people who try to make everything about them have
issues.

You definitely have issues.

But they will disappear when you die.

Kavin

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> On Feb 25, 3:51 am, c...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.) wrote:
>> KavinTay...@gmail.com <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Kgc> But a few of you might be getting email in a couple of weeks.
>> i'd better be in that list.
Kgc> Top of the list, baby.

i love it when you're attentive to my needs.

lish "i'm sorry i punched you in the throat.
crank@got.net get up." -jerkcity
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
>
> > Of course, I'm prone to scribble on and
> > on about myself as well, but re the subject
> > line (and seeing as how what'shisface
> > seems to love mentioning my teaching gig),
>
> Did I mention it here?

Makes no difference.

> Didn't your loving uncle give you enough
> attention?

Ha! See? You're nothing but a one-trick pony.

And it's a crummy trick, at that. ;o)

> That was rhetorical. Of course he did.
> I bet lots and lots of attention.
>
> Granny didn't love you like she said?

Spin your fantasies.

> Really, Curt, people who try to make
> everything about them have issues.

Zat so?

> You definitely have issues.

ahahahaHAHAH! Suh-WEET! You probably won't believe this, but I'm
wearing... lemme see if I can Google this one quick.

THAT was easy. Google search string of i have
issues, bart simpson t-shirt and voilà!

http://cgi.ebay.com/THE-SIMPSONS-Bar...QQcmdZViewItem
aka http://tinyurl.com/25q4nc

> But they will disappear when you die.

Perhaps your issues will disappear, but I'm counting on mine being
passed on. You're apparently very grumpy, negative, bitter, angry,
and, hey, based on your experience with volleyballs, I'd say, rather
unlucky. I suspect your issues are based at least in part on those
attributes.

While I, on the other hand, am generally happy, possessed of a good
humor (yeah, and modesty), and having been blessed with the
opportunity to have participated in the lives of young people for the
past seven years. Whatchugot?

I say it's most definitely nothing. Zip. Nada.

Good luck with that. :o)

> Kavin

--
Curt

On Feb 25, 9:41 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > "Curt" wrote:


C> You're apparently very grumpy, negative, bitter, angry,
C> and, hey, based on your experience with volleyballs, I'd say,
rather
C> unlucky. I suspect your issues are based at least in part on those
C> attributes.

See, that's why YOU will never get better, Curt. Grumpy, negative,
bitter, etc. don't "cause" issues.

And by the way, why don't you ask the people on RAB who have met me
what my demeanor is.

Wanting you dead doesn't make me bitter, grumpy or angry. And your
death isn't going to make me ecstaic, either. I know there are more
silly, vapid, weak people just like you who will still exist. I know
the damage you have already done cannot be undone. And I know you
don't care -- because you just don't get it.

You keep acting as if you are taking the high ground but you bring up
me taking a volleyball to the genitals. Hey, that's your "issue."
Why does that give you a charge, Curt? You like lists, let's try one:
13 year-old sweaty girls, genitals, pain, maybe a little blood. Did
it turn you on? Is that what it's all about, Curt? Come on, RAB's
dead, remember? No one's watching. You can admit it.

>
C> While I, on the other hand, am generally happy, possessed of a good
C> humor (yeah, and modesty), and having been blessed with the
C> opportunity to have participated in the lives of young people for
the
C> past seven years.

That would be . . . "have been blessed with . . ."

And are those the Black young people?


Kavin

"Curt" <curtjames@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172367388.225341.89450@p10g2000cwp.googlegro ups.com...
> mentalguy2004 wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Nice to see you're using the subject line to <snip!>
>
> But enough about ol' grumpy! :oD
>
> What up, mg?
>
> Of course, I'm prone to scribble on and on about myself as well, but
> re the subject line (and seeing as how what'shisface seems to love
> mentioning my teaching gig), did you see the recent news bit about the
> children's book being banned for using the word scrotum?
>
> Apparently so.
>
> (Google search string: children's books, scrotum)
>
> "The Higher Power of Lucky," by Susan Patron, this year's winner of
> the Newbery Medal, the most prestigious award in children's
> literature. <snip> On electronic mailing lists like Librarian.net,
> dozens of literary blogs and pages on the social-networking site
> LiveJournal, teachers, authors and school librarians took sides over
> the book. Librarians from all over the country, including Missoula,
> Mont.; upstate New York; Central Pennsylvania; and Portland, Ore.,
> weighed in, questioning the role of the librarian when selecting - or
> censoring, some argued - literature for children. /copy and paste from
> text @:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/18/bo...rssnyt&emc=rss
>
> While listening to NPR today, the one radio personality quipped that
> the librarians were becoming testy!
>
> ba dump bump :o)
>
> Another person said that the whole idea was to get children to read
> and what better way to do that than with the enticement of "forbidden"
> words. They said every other page should have the word included.
> Someone else in the cast joked they should have a picture of a breast
> on every other page to which the one man said he's thinking of that
> for his next book - the one he's going to purchase as well as the one
> he's going to write.
>
> ba dump bump, the sequel ;o)
>
> Uh, anyway.

This place isn't what it used to be LOL. When each of my kids was around 5
or 6, the teachers made the class sit and repeat "penis, testicles, penis,
testicles" over and over, to *de-sensitise* them from the words. Then they
could begin the basic biology lessons without the sniggers.

I dunno, most newsgroups seem to be the same way nowadays. There's always a
few cliques and an obligatory loudmouth who thinks he knows everything about
everything and makes sure all the newbies don't come back. Maybe it's a
jealousy thing..... the fear that a newbie might go out and get a
tat/piercing that's better than *his*. So let's not encourage or guide
anyone, and then we'll still be the only people in the world who have the
experience and knowledge neccessary to answer questions around here.
Insecurity.

<KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172383650.851677.57700@q2g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
> On Feb 24, 3:54 pm, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:
>
> Glad to see you're interested in my nut sack.

Hard not to be, with you shoving it down my throat. But that's not the first
time you've heard that from a guy, eh?

And please leave me off the mailing list... I might get a pic of a
shrivelled up ballbag and mistake it for your full face portrait.

On Feb 26, 5:28 am, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:
> <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1172383650.851677.57700@q2g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
>
> > On Feb 24, 3:54 pm, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:
>
kt> > Glad to see you're interested in my nut sack.
>
> Hard not to be, with you shoving it down my throat.

Fantasy of yours, MG?

> But that's not the first
> time you've heard that from a guy, eh?

Uh, yeah.
>
> And please leave me off the mailing list... I might get a pic of a
> shrivelled up ballbag

That would only happen if you sent yourself a self-portrait.

Kavin

<KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172498238.656737.94520@8g2000cwh.googlegroup s.com...
> On Feb 26, 5:28 am, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:
>> <KavinTay...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1172383650.851677.57700@q2g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
>>
>> > On Feb 24, 3:54 pm, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:
>>
> kt> > Glad to see you're interested in my nut sack.
>>
>> Hard not to be, with you shoving it down my throat.
>
> Fantasy of yours, MG?
>
>> But that's not the first
>> time you've heard that from a guy, eh?
>
> Uh, yeah.
>>
>> And please leave me off the mailing list... I might get a pic of a
>> shrivelled up ballbag
>
> That would only happen if you sent yourself a self-portrait.

Ummm.... you're repeating my lines back to me like a 6-year-old. Not very
good at this are you? Run along now.

On Feb 26, 9:34 am, "mentalguy2004" <n...@none.com> wrote:
> Ummm.... you're repeating my lines back to me like a 6-year-old. Not very
> good at this are you? Run along now


Two things. Tradition says I quote what I'm replying to, because,
with fucktards like Curt, there can be no misunderstandings that way.

And second, I don't fucking care what you think. Do you have a life?
It appears your only life is on the Internet, what with your number of
posts. Of course they say nothing, so that shouldn't take too long if
you key quickly.

If Curt's your aspiration, I know 6-year-olds smarter than you.

Why do I suspect you would waddle along?


Kavin