tats.tv is on auction !

For those who are interested --- get the best tattoo / bodyart domain
name around. 4 days left:

http://www.tats.tv

On auction at Sedo.

domains <cybrecellar@aol.com> wrote:
d> For those who are interested --- get the best tattoo / bodyart domain
d> name around. 4 days left:
d> On auction at

i'm sure anyone cares about this stupid name! i'm sure it'll be
very popular! i'm sure someone will pay you a lot of money for it!

lish "you were nothing
crank@got.net but a brief distraction." -ftf
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

domains wrote:

> <snip> the best tattoo / bodyart
> domain name around. <snip>

The best? Hmm, imo, that'd be http://www.tattoos.com/.

> http://www.tats.tv

Regardless, best of luck with your auction.

--
Curt

On Mar 4, 9:06 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> domains wrote:
> > <snip> the best tattoo / bodyart
> > domain name around. <snip>
>
> The best? Hmm, imo, that'd behttp://www.tattoos.com/.

Can you name a "bad" iyopo site?

Kavin

On Mar 5, 8:40 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 4, 9:06 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > domains wrote:
> > > <snip> the best tattoo / bodyart
> > > domain name around. <snip>
>
> > The best? Hmm, imo, that'd be http://www.tattoos.com/.
>
> Can you name a "bad" iyopo site?
>
> Kavin

English, please.

--
Curt

On Mar 5, 9:01 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 8:40 am, "KavinTay...@gmail.com" <KavinTay...@gmail.com>

kt> > Can you name a "bad" iyopo site?


>
> English, please.


Come on! Can you name a "bad" in your own personal opinion site?

Of course you can't. No bad. No good.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

> Come on! Can you name a "bad"

Kavin, thy name is rehash.

> in your own personal opinion

Opinion? Hmm. Let's you and I review, shall we?

My comments wrt good and bad have been tied to tattoos in particular.
To wit, art is subjective and ever shall be. What you like I may
detest and the other way around, of course. I say holding a belief
that there are no bad tattoos would not, *does not* disallow the
ability to compare and contrast existing tattoos. Stating there are no
bad tattoos opens up
the possibility of a discussion of technique (or lack thereof) and
intent. See also:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...dfe0adeb50f455
aka http://tinyurl.com/qrsnt

If you discount certain tattoos then you're limiting that discussion.

Good for me would be a tattoo that I enjoy looking at. I have two
color tattoos and the one blackwork which is not much more than an
inkblot. Each has its own personality or memory that I associate with
it. And as I run into people and show off or share my tattoos -
typically the Calvin - another memory is associated with the tattoo.

Bad and good, so far as tattoos are concerned, are dependent on the
individual, imo. I suggest that individuals should not lose sight of
what they enjoy and the art that appeals to them rather than the art
they're told is somehow better.

Yes, imo, there are no bad tattoos. There are, however, tattoos that
you like or that you don't like for personal reasons.

Ymm - obviously - v.

Hth.

> site?
>
> Of course you can't.

I could.

> No bad. No good.

No dice. But, hey, I trust you'll try again.

> Kavin

--
Curt

On Mar 6, 7:46 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I say holding a belief
> that there are no bad tattoos would not, *does not* disallow the
> ability to compare and contrast existing tattoos.

Really?

How does one compare when you disallow one end of the spectrum?

So once again, your opinion is totally worthless. The only thing you
can really say, Curt, using your statement, is that a tattoo is.

Sterling.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
>
> > I say holding a belief that there are
> > no bad tattoos would not, *does not*
> > disallow the ability to compare and
> > contrast existing tattoos.
>
> Really?
>
> How does one compare when you
> disallow one end of the spectrum?

Through the magic of semantics. While you're obviously hung up on good
versus bad, I don't have a need to judge, snipe, complain, and whine.

> So once again, your opinion is totally
> worthless.

Opinion. Enjoy yours! :oD

> The only thing you can really say, Curt,
> using your statement, is that a tattoo is.

Tattoo ergo sum?

> Sterling.

Holloway!

> Kavin

--
Curt