a decade of this silliness

i just now happened to look at my modification records (of course
i keep track of everything; don't you know who you're reading?) & saw that
today is the ten year anniversary of my left nipple piercing. i find that
highly amusing.

other upcoming decade anniversaries: septum, right nipple, various
ear cartilage work, one of my nostril piercings, my first large-scale
tattoo (right thigh), & my backpiece. i was busy in 1997.

lish "you still don't understand the reason
crank@got.net you've been treated so unkind?" -ftf
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

On Apr 5, 10:54 pm, c...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.) wrote:
> i just now happened to look at my modification records (of course
> i keep track of everything; don't you know who you're reading?) & saw that
> today is the ten year anniversary of my left nipple piercing. i find that
> highly amusing.
>
> other upcoming decade anniversaries: septum, right nipple, various
> ear cartilage work, one of my nostril piercings, my first large-scale
> tattoo (right thigh), & my backpiece. i was busy in 1997.

Yes, all nice. But when did you first use the term "cunt nugget?"

Kavin

i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:

> i just now happened to look
> at my modification records (of course
> i keep track of everything; don't you
> know who you're reading?) & saw that
> today is the ten year anniversary of
> my left nipple piercing. i find that
> highly amusing.

Happy anniversary.

> <snip> i was busy in 1997.

My right nipple was my first non-lobe piercing. Melanie in Lancaster,
June 1998.

Records are a good thing:

http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/piercings.html

Speaking of records...

Domain Name:RABBITHOLE.ORG
Last Updated On:12-Mar-2007 07:43:02 UTC

http://www.rabbithole.org

:o(

--
Curt

KavinTaylor@gmail.com <KavinTaylor@gmail.com> wrote:
Kgc> On Apr 5, 10:54 pm, c...@got.net (i'll teach you to turn away.) wrote:
>> i keep track of everything; don't you know who you're reading?) & saw that
>> today is the ten year anniversary of my left nipple piercing. i find that
Kgc> Yes, all nice. But when did you first use the term "cunt nugget?"

may 11 of 1999 is the first recorded entry i have.

lish "we don't even care
crank@got.net whether or not we care." -ma
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70

On Apr 6, 10:03 am, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My right nipple was my first non-lobe piercing. Melanie in Lancaster,
> June 1998.
>
> Records are a good thing:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/piercings.html


And you show a picture of a hack that is using forceps. Good work.
Says it all. Really.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

re http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/piercings.html

> And you show a picture

You got any pictures, toots?

[...]

Didn't think so. ;o)

--
Curt

On Apr 9, 12:58 am, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> rehttp://www.geocities.com/curt_james/piercings.html
>
> > And you show a picture
>
> You got any pictures, toots?

Not of a hack using forceps on me.

Typical of you to try to change the meaning of my post to suit your
needs.

Helps prove my point.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
[...]

re http://www.geocities.com/curt_james/piercings.html

> > > And you show a picture
>
> > You got any pictures, toots?
>
> Not of a hack using forceps on me.

That's nice, Kav.

> Typical of you to try to change the
> meaning of my post to suit your
> needs.

And typical of you is to cry foul when I reply to your posts. 1) The
man is no hack. 2) You have no pictures of yourself. 3) You set
standards for others that you don't achieve yourself.

> Helps prove my point.

Which all helps prove my point: You got nothing.

Hth.

--
Curt

On Apr 9, 10:50 am, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> And typical of you is to cry foul when I reply to your posts.

When you clip my sentence to make it say something I did not intend,
that is a foul. You think it's clever.


1) The
> man is no hack.
Forceps = hack for several reasons. Tissue damage would be one
problem. Do you trust they were sterilized properly? Then again,
Hep. for you is not something I would not cry about.

2) You have no pictures of yourself.

Wrong. Because I don't post them for the general public does not mean
they do not exist. But, as you have just proven, you don't get logic
too well.

3) You set
> standards for others that you don't achieve yourself.

Excuse me? Drinking your way through Spring Break?


Curt, your saying "You got nothing" means nothing,

Hth.



Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
>
> > And typical of you is to cry foul when
> > I reply to your posts.
>
> When you clip my sentence to make
> it say something I did not intend,
> that is a foul.

Wah.

> You think it's clever.

It's accurate. Build it into your responses. Anticipate. Deal with it.

> > 1) The man is no hack.
>
> Forceps = hack for several reasons.

<yawn>

> Tissue damage would be one
> problem.

Nick never damaged any tissue that I didn't ask to be damaged. ;o)

> Do you trust they were sterilized
> properly?

Yeah. I'm a trusting guy.

> Then again, Hep. for you is not
> something I would not cry about.

Um, Kavvy, do you read what you write? HA! :oD

I mean, seems like I don't even have to clip your sentence to make it
say something you did not intend. ;o)

> 2) You have no pictures of yourself.
>
> Wrong.

Share, Kav. Share!

> Because I don't post them for the
> general public does not mean
> they do not exist.

Hey, I'm sure "the general public" thanks you, beautiful.

> But, as you have just proven, you
> don't get logic too well.

Kavin logic? Not so much.

> > 3) You set standards for others
> > that you don't achieve yourself.
>
> Excuse me?

No excuse for you, I suspect.

> Drinking your way through Spring Break?

Several coffees, two Diet Pepsis, some milk, O.J., water. Sure.

> Curt, your saying "You got nothing"
> means nothing,

heh :o)

Hence your continued protestations?

> Hth.

In fact, it does.

> Kavin

Keep up the good work.

--
Curt

On Apr 9, 5:54 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > "Curt" wrote:
>
> > Then again, Hep. for you is not
> > something I would not cry about.
>
> Um, Kavvy, do you read what you write? HA! :oD


You're right. I made a mistake. See, unlike you, I can admit
mistakes.

I would not cry if you had Hep. In fact, it has been a while since I
have said the following:

Just die Curt.

Oh, and why no family links on your web page? Does that coincide with
your niece's picture vanishing?

Surely you must have photos of your loving uncle and trailer-park
granny. They couldn't be any more outdated than your "friends"
photos.


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > > "Curt" wrote:
>
> > > Then again, Hep. for you is not
> > > something I would not cry about.
>
> > Um, Kavvy, do you read what you
> write? HA! :oD
>
> You're right.

Thank you.

> I made a mistake.

Big surprise.

> See, unlike you, I can admit mistakes.

Cool.

But you're dropping the stalker ball, Kavvy. I just repeated in a post
elsewhere, my oft repeated quote, "There is no limit to what I do not
know." It's all about learning. And, of course, I make mistakes. Hey,
I post and reply to you, don't I? ;o)

> I would not cry if you had Hep.
> In fact, it has been a while since I
> have said the following:
>
> Just die Curt.

Patience, Kav. Patience.

> Oh, and why no family links on
> your web page?

Ah, back to your stalkerish self. Kudos. To answer that question:
groups.msn.com ate the whole web page and corresponding jpegs,
unfortunately. I'm sure I've got the pics on a computer somewhere.
I've got three in various states of unpluggedness. And the laptop.
Plus schtufff on disk and those memory sticks. It's a question of
organization, I suppose.

You can flip through my LJ, my Photobucket pages or albums, MySpace,
etc. Get busy, Kav. It's out there.

> Does that coincide with your niece's
> picture vanishing?

Iirc, it was a RABbit who recommended I pull the niece pic. For
security purposes, I believe was the reason. See, I heed good advice.
Or advice I see as reasonable.

> Surely you must have photos of
> your loving uncle

We look much alike. And I *know* you know what I look like.

> and trailer-park granny.

Grandma's in one of my IAM galleries. Knock yourself out.

> They couldn't be any more
> outdated than your "friends"
> photos.

http://groups.msn.com/PH17/ekiii2003.msnw

Hey, the friends remain the same!

> Kavin

Regardless, your web presence (or lack thereof) should, imo, negate
any of your criticism of my photos. Put up or shut up. Any procedural
pics? Any photos of your mug of late? Didn't think so.

Oh, it's a "general public" thing? Keep telling yourself that, Kavin.

--
Curt

On Apr 9, 7:27 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Regardless, your web presence (or lack thereof) should, imo, negate
> any of your criticism of my photos.

According to that logic, only artists could criticize artists. Only
movie directors could make comments on other directors' films. Sorry,
I may not be a snowflake, but I can tell when it's cold outside.


>Put up or shut up. Any procedural
> pics? Any photos of your mug of late? Didn't think so.

Again, one has nothing to do with the other, There are pictures of me
on the net. In fact, I think there is a procedural somewhere. If
someone else wants to do it, fine. Unlike you, I see a vanity page
for what it is -- vanity. And I also see the importance of what is
omitted, or what is updated. If your most recent photos of friends is
a two-year-old link, it says something about you. But hey, you put it
on the net for all to see.

And believe me, if you had friends to show off, you would be doing it.

And I still wonder about an artist that doesn't post their art.

Maybe you do truly know your shortcomings. Or at least there are
those you won't put on public display.

Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> "Curt" wrote:
>
> > Regardless, your web presence
> > (or lack thereof) should, imo, negate
> > any of your criticism of my photos.
>
> According to that logic, only artists
> could criticize artists. Only movie
> directors could make comments on
> other directors' films.

Criticism is overrated.

> Sorry, I may not be a snowflake,

Oh, who says? You're a snowflake and a darling one at that.

> but I can tell when it's cold outside.

Cool!

Or, yeah, cold.

> > Put up or shut up. Any procedural
> > pics? Any photos of your mug of
> > late? Didn't think so.
>
> Again, one has nothing to do with
> the other, There are pictures of me
> on the net.

Meh.

> In fact, I think there is a procedural
> somewhere. If someone else wants
> to do it, fine. Unlike you, I see a
> vanity page for what it is -- vanity.

Right. Ye without vanity! Go Kavvy, go!

> And I also see the importance of
> what is omitted, or what is updated.

In YOUR opinion, of course. ;o)

> If your most recent photos of
> friends is a two-year-old link, it says
> something about you.

Can't read?

I said the friends remain the same.

Can't subtract either, apparently. The link is dated 2003. Which, hey,
let me give it a shot... 2007 minus 2003 equals, um, four years.

> But hey, you put it on the net
> for all to see.

And, perhaps, for all but you to comprehend? :o)

> And believe me, if you had friends
> to show off, you would be doing it.

That's where you're wrong. And yet another example of your not being
able to read what I've written.

I advocate speaking for yourself. I don't use the we, but rather
prefer the I. You, otoh, have a proclivity of leaning on the almighty
we. To each his own, naturally.

> And I still wonder about an artist
> that doesn't post their art.

Asked and answered. Again, you forget.

> Maybe you do truly know your
> shortcomings.

I haven't cataloged all my shortcomings. Maybe you should begin an
inventory of your own?

> Or at least there are those you
> won't put on public display.
>
> Kavin

I can wield a mean enough pencil, but as I stated the last time you
shook this tree, I consider myself more a cartoonist than any other
kind of artist.

As I see it, we're at something of a stalemate. You've got "Curt die,
waaah." and I've got "Kavvy, you got nuthin'."

How's the following for logic? I trust that I shall die before you
have something. Of course, that doesn't preclude at all, your death
coming before my death.

Best of luck, Kavin.

--
Curt

On Apr 10, 10:54 pm, "Curt" <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> How's the following for logic? I trust that I shall die before you
> have something. Of course, that doesn't preclude at all, your death
> coming before my death.

Curt, that's not logic. That's hope -- at best.


Try again.

And since you consider yourself a cartoonist, I'm sure you will tell
us where those cartoons have appeared. Do you work at Six Flags
during the summers?

Kavin

Loved the missing comma. Spelling is one thing -- not knowing the use
of a comma is another. And we might want to discuss colons.