Here come da judge!

And, apparently, he's got good news:

Judge Tosses 2 Tattoo Regulations

Oklahoma City - A judge tossed out state Health Department regulations
Tuesday that required tattoo shops to have a $100,000 surety bond and
banned them from doing business within 1,000 feet of schools, churches
or playgrounds.

District Judge Dan Owens ruled that these provisions were
unconstitutional.

State officials have not decided if they will appeal the ruling, which
stems from a lawsuit filed in February by the Association of Body Art,
a group of tattoo shop owners.

Oklahoma has granted licenses to 39 tattoo shops since tattooing
became legal in the state last fall.

The state also has 121 licensed tattoo artists, according to Health
Department figures. /copy and paste from http://www.koco.com/news/13237140/detail.html

I wonder if ol' Dan has some ink.

--
Curt

On May 1, 7:20 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And, apparently, he's got good news:

Yeah, and your subject line wouldn't be even slightly racist?

Oh wait, this is the same person that told a young black child "You're
all Black!"

Sweeeeet!

That membership you have must give you rights?


Kavin
(And yes, I know where the line came from. Are you going to say
you're a Black drag queen?)

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
>
> > And, apparently, he's got good news:
>
> Yeah, and your subject line wouldn't be even
> slightly racist?

Kavin, my subject line wouldn't be even slightly racist.

> Oh wait, this is the same person that told a young
> black child "You're all Black!"

Got a cite for that?

> Sweeeeet!
>
> That membership you have must give you rights?

Actually, I need to renew. Appreciate that reminder.

> Kavin
> (And yes, I know where the line came from.

Do you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigmeat_Markham

> Are you going to say you're a Black drag
> queen?)

Ha! You DON'T.

--
Curt

On May 3, 4:25 pm, Curt <curtja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > Curt wrote:
>
> > > And, apparently, he's got good news:
>
> > Yeah, and your subject line wouldn't be even
> > slightly racist?
>
> Kavin, my subject line wouldn't be even slightly racist.

Then neither was Mr. Imus' comments about "Nappy-headed ho's."

Oh, wait, you then followed with :

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigmeat_Markham

Let's see, a white male using the words of a black comedian as an
intro to an article that had what to do with anyone being black --
because that would be the only (and a very poor) reason to use the
phrase you did?

So why did you think you were being clever?

>
> > Oh wait, this is the same person that told a young
> > black child "You're all Black!"
>
> Got a cite for that?

You've already acknowledged you said it. Deleting from a bulletin
board (which you ALL should have done) does not mean it did not
exist. Your words still exist on RAB.

How are your Black Planet escapades working for you? Still trying to
be confused with a true artist?


Kavin

Kavin Taylor wrote:
> Curt wrote:
> > Kavin Taylor wrote:
> > > Curt wrote:
>
> > > > And, apparently, he's got good news:
>
> > > Yeah, and your subject line wouldn't be even
> > > slightly racist?
>
> > Kavin, my subject line wouldn't be even slightly
> > racist.
>
> Then neither was Mr. Imus' com<snip!>

What? My post was regarding A JUDGE in Oklahoma.

Duh.

Hence using the "Here come da judge!" Subject line. No different than
using another popular phrase - "Where's the beef?" to intro a post
about, um, beef.

You feeling okay, Kavvy?

> Oh, wait, you then followed with :
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigmeat_Markham

Riiiiiight. And why? Oh, because you commented on "Here come da
judge!" apparently in relation to Flip Wilson. You didn't do your
research though. No surprise.

> Let's see

Might want to open up your eyes if that's your intent. I suspect it's
not, of course. ;o)

[...]

> <snip> reason to use the phrase you did?

Did you happen to notice the word JUDGE in the article I included in
my post? Naaaaaah. You were the one who alluded to a comedian. Not the
one who originated the phrase used in my Subject line, btw.

Double duh.

[...]

> > > Oh wait, this is the same person that told a young
> > > black child "You're all Black!"
>
> > Got a cite for that?
>
> You've already acknowledged you said it.

And?

> Deleting from a bulletin board

What bulletin board? Again, cite? Generally, I don't delete my posts.
Occasionally, I have deleted a double post from Google groups, however
those double posts remain on Usenet, afaik.

> (which you ALL should have done) does not mean
> it did not exist.

And?

> Your words still exist on RAB.

Cool.

> How are your Black Planet escapades working
> for you?

You're all over the place tonight, Kav. Escapades? Regardless, I
haven't posted to BP in quite some time. It's a nice system. Not
unlike IAM or LJ.

Anyway, how are your stalker escapades working for you?

> Still trying to be confused

I'd ask you the same question, but it's obvious that you're doing a
smashing job at being confused.

> with a true artist?

Define true.

On topic artist, since you've asked, to my immediate left are pairs of
Crayola Model Magic fruits and vegetables which I put together as
examples for tomorrow's school activities. Pumpkins, tomatoes, apples,
cherries, carrots, and bananas so far. Blueberries, celery, turnips,
etc. yet to come.

You still sad, Kavvy? Or has our back and forth cheered you up? ;o)

--
Curt